Log in
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Dynamic quotes 

4-Traders Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nyse  >  Dominion Energy    D

Mes dernières consult.
Most popular
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsSector newsTweets

Dominion Energy : Possible expansion to S.C. leads to questions about planned pipeline's capacity Does potential expansion of Atlantic Coast Pipeline to South Carolina change equation for Virginia?

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
10/05/2017 | 09:14am CET

How much gas can the Atlantic Coast Pipeline carry?

That question surged to the front of the pack last week amid ongoing critiques including how Virginia is handling water-quality certifications for the controversial Dominion Energy-led project and arguments before the State Corporation Commission about whether Virginia ratepayers will fork over up to $2.4 billion in additional costs for what opponents say is an unnecessary new source of natural gas.

Dominion Energy'sDan Weekley, a vice president and general manager at the company, told the South Carolina Clean Energy Summit in Columbia last month that Dominion could bring "almost a billion cubic feet a day into South Carolina" when it extends the pipeline, as "everyone knows" it will, according to an Associated Press report last week.

Those remarks, pipeline opponents contend, undercut the stated rationale for the roughly $5.5 billion, 600-mile project, which, if approved, will bring Marcellus Shale natural gas through West Virginia, across Virginia and into North Carolina, with an extension running from the Virginia-North Carolina border south of Emporia to Chesapeake.

"For us, that underscores this issue that we've been focusing on: that there's not demand for new gas-fired power plants in Virginia or North Carolina that will justify the Atlantic Coast Pipeline," said Greg Buppert, an attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center in Charlottesville, which has fought the project. "That sounds like companies looking for a market for their products because the market they've been banking on isn't materializing."

Dominion and its partners, which include Duke Energy, have said the prime driver of the project is a demand for natural gas from utilities in Virginia and North Carolina that have already signed contracts for the vast majority of the 1.5 billion cubic feet of gas a day that developers have said the pipeline will carry.

Weekley's remarks mean that either most of the gas the pipeline will carry won't go to Virginia or North Carolina or it can carry more gas than previously stated.

According to Dominion spokesman Aaron Ruby, the answer is the latter. And he stressed that no decisions have been made to expand the pipeline at this point.

Ruby said the pipeline could carry up to 2 billion cubic feet of natural gas by adding new compressor stations, beefing up the horsepower of existing stations or a combination of the two. Any additional capacity would require putting new pipe in the ground.

"It's way too premature to get into that because this is all hypothetical. Our focus right now is completing the project as proposed so we can serve the urgent needs of public utilities in Virginia and North Carolina," Ruby said.

Ruby added that the contracts for capacity on the pipeline "are 20-year binding contracts."

"Those are locked in place," Ruby said. "If we at some point were to expand the pipeline into South Carolina, that would have no impact on the service we're already committed to providing to our public utility customers in North Carolina and Virginia."

But Buppert, the SELC attorney, as other opponents have pointed out, noted that most of the capacity contracted on the pipeline is by companies that are affiliated with pipeline developers, such as Virginia Power Services, which procures fuel used by Dominion Energy Virginia, the Richmond-based utility with nearly 2.5 million customers in Virginia.

"So they're not arms-length transactions between independent market actors," Buppert said. "That definitely is a consideration when thinking about how binding these contracts are. ... Dominion could release that capacity to other users."

FERC could issue its approval of the project any day now, and the potential for any future expansion won't enter into the decision-making process, said Tamara Young-Allen, a spokeswoman for the commission.

"First of all, they have to get the current facility certificated. If they were to get a certificate, they would have to come back with a new application for the new facility," Young-Allen said.

She added that applications seeking to expand on existing infrastructure are common.

"It happens all the time," she said. "They get new customers and those customers want service to a new tap. ... Any time there's a change to what the company has certificated, they would have to submit an application to make any change to what the commission has authorized."

Ruby said Weekley's remarks, which were reported by the Associated Press via an audio recording sent to a reporter there, came in response to a question at a public forum.

"Our company has been very straightforward about the potential to expand the infrastructure in any number of public settings," Ruby said. "We constantly hear from economic developers and others in South Carolina for the need for new natural gas infrastructure in their state."

[email protected]

(804) 649-6453Twitter: @rczullo

© © Copyright 2017, Richmond Times-Dispatch, Richmond, VA, source Newspapers

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
Latest news on DOMINION ENERGY
07:42aDOMINION ENERGY : Energy supplier encourages energy efficiency
03/17DOMINION ENERGY : State cites pipeline's tree cutting for violation Atlantic Coa..
03/17DOMINION ENERGY : Pipeline workers cut down trees in off-limits areas Atlantic C..
03/17LETTERS TO THE EDITOR LETTERS TO THE : Why did Dems leave middle America behind?
03/15DOMINION ENERGY : House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee Issues Testimony From Dom..
03/15LETTERS TO THE EDITOR LETTERS TO THE : Why did Dems leave middle America behind?
03/15POLICE : Car crashes, overturns, knocks down power lines in Newport News
03/14DOMINION ENERGY : Norfolk approves gas pipeline construction beneath drinking wa..
03/13DOMINION ENERGY : fails in attempt to bar testimony on pipeline's potential $2.3..
03/13OFFICIALS : Snow on Peninsula could have slight impact on morning commute
More news
News from SeekingAlpha
11:02aDIVIDEND SENSEI'S PORTFOLIO UPDATE 2 : When Bombshells Go Off, You Adapt Or Die 
03/19March 16. U.S. LNG Market Weekly Recap 
03/18FERC Upsets MLPs, March Sadness Continues 
03/18Lanny's March Dividend Stock Watch List 
Financials ($)
Sales 2018 13 710 M
EBIT 2018 4 809 M
Net income 2018 2 666 M
Debt 2018 36 918 M
Yield 2018 4,82%
P/E ratio 2018 16,93
P/E ratio 2019 16,57
EV / Sales 2018 5,98x
EV / Sales 2019 5,68x
Capitalization 45 053 M
Duration : Period :
Dominion Energy Technical Analysis Chart | D | US25746U1097 | 4-Traders
Technical analysis trends DOMINION ENERGY
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
Income Statement Evolution
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 17
Average target price 79,3 $
Spread / Average Target 15%
EPS Revisions
Thomas F. Farrell Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
Mark F. McGettrick Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President
P. Rodney Blevins Chief Information Officer & Senior Vice President
Scot C. Hathaway Senior VP- Commercial Services, Gas Infrastructure
John W. Harris Independent Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
DOMINION ENERGY-12.89%46 004
DUKE ENERGY CORP-8.41%54 360
IBERDROLA-7.86%47 699