Log in
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Dynamic quotes 

4-Traders Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nyse  >  Dominion Energy    D

Mes dernières consult.
Most popular
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsofficial PublicationsSector newsTweets

Principi: Alternatives for removal of coal ash are feasible

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
12/14/2017 | 07:38pm CEST

Just in time for the holidays, the people of Prince William County received a gift from the Virginia General Assembly, in the form of an 800-page report analyzing the options for Dominion Energy's disposal of the hazardous coal ash stored in ponds at the Possum Point facility in Dumfries. The findings validate the environmental concerns surrounding the controversial cap-in-place method proposed by Dominion, and demonstrate that there are feasible alternatives with less environmental impact, including one that could generate economic growth. This report marked the latest step in a multi-year odyssey of community members, local and state officials and nonprofits working together to ensure that the coal ash dewatering and removal process is done in the most effective, environmentally sensitive and safe manner possible. To me, cost should not be the primary consideration in disposing of the coal ash. Rather, it should be protecting the residents who live on and around Possum Point Road, followed by ensuring that Dominion's removal of the coal ash – a highly toxic, cancer-causing byproduct of burning coal for fuel – occurs in the least intrusive manner while simultaneously protecting the environment, to include keeping pollutants out of Quantico Creek, the Potomac River and Chesapeake Bay.While there hasn't been time to fully digest the entirety of the report, there were several immediate takeaways that provide clarity and direction moving forward: First, we've learned that contaminants are leaking into the ground around the coal ash ponds. While Dominion contends that the contaminants haven't breached the ground wells of surrounding homes, these findings prove that cap-in-place is no longer a viable option. We cannot risk the possibility of contaminants further leaching into the ground and poisoning water sources. Second, the analyzed "alternative options" can be fully achieved within the 15-year window that the Environmental Protection Agency has set for coal ash pond closures. These findings dilute arguments that the alternative closure options are all unfeasible or impractical. In fact, the report makes the alternatives more attractive.Third, several promising alternatives are financially viable. This stands in direct contradiction to Dominion's assertion that alternatives to cap-in-place-such as moving coal ash to a fully lined landfill, removing and transporting it off-site or selling the ash to be repurposed in products such as bricks-are either unfeasible or cost-prohibitive. This report definitively proves that this simply isn't the case.Dominion estimates that its proposed cap-in-place option will take three to five years to complete and cost up to $418 million. Comparatively, relocating the coal ash to a lined landfill, which would dramatically reduce the possibility of leaching, would cost $380 million and take eight years.The prospect of environmental contamination makes both of these options unsatisfactory, in my opinion. Comparatively, the joint concept of removal, which on its own is the most expensive alternative, combined with reuse (fly ash, a coal ash byproduct, can be used to strengthen concrete and bricks) would take eight to 17 years and cost approximately $899 million. However, the cost could be offset by the construction of a new production facility that would bring with it the creation of dozens of new, high-paying jobs. Dominion is likely to make a profit from reuse. We are now equipped with a clearer picture of what can and should be done to protect people living near Possum Point, along with the surrounding land and waterways. I look forward to a continued dialogue with area residents, my colleagues on the Board of County Supervisors, the Prince William delegation in Richmond and Dominion officials to find an environmentally sound solution for closing the coal ash ponds in Prince William County.

Supervisor Frank Principi,

Woodbridge District

© Prince William Today © Copyright 2017, Sun Gazette Newspapers, Springfield, VA., source Newspapers

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
Latest news on DOMINION ENERGY
02:37pDOMINION ENERGY : Was the 2007 law that jumpstarted S.C. nuclear project unconst..
11:55aDOMINION ENERGY : Conservancy Award 23 Local Watershed Grants
04/20DOMINION ENERGY : deal to buy S.C. utility could be in jeopardy South Carolina S..
04/20DOMINION ENERGY : SCANA Merger Could Boost South Carolina Economy by $18.7 Billi..
04/19DOMINION ENERGY : Slaughter helps in Puerto Rico
04/19DOMINION ENERGY : Cove Point Enters Commercial Service for Liquefied Natural Gas..
04/19DOMINION ENERGY : SCE&G customers closer to lower power bills after Senate votes..
04/19DOMINION ENERGY : SC Senate votes to slash SCE&G's power bills, risking Dominion..
04/18DOMINION ENERGY : S.C. lawmakers wait to vote on electric rate cut as Dominion, ..
04/18DOMINION ENERGY : Ahead of vote that may kill Dominion-SCANA deal, study finds s..
More news
News from SeekingAlpha
04/20Rising Inflationary Expectations Cap Equities 
04/20FERC begins inquiry into gas pipeline certification process 
04/20Announcement Of An All-Stock Merger With Scana, And Dominion Is Down 20% 
04/19Dominion-Scana merger threatened after South Carolina Senate passes bill 
04/18Lanny's Q1 Dividend Portfolio Update 
Financials ($)
Sales 2018 13 499 M
EBIT 2018 4 762 M
Net income 2018 2 656 M
Debt 2018 36 494 M
Yield 2018 5,11%
P/E ratio 2018 16,20
P/E ratio 2019 15,92
EV / Sales 2018 5,96x
EV / Sales 2019 5,65x
Capitalization 43 932 M
Duration : Period :
Dominion Energy Technical Analysis Chart | D | US25746U1097 | 4-Traders
Technical analysis trends DOMINION ENERGY
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
Income Statement Evolution
Mean consensus HOLD
Number of Analysts 17
Average target price 73,7 $
Spread / Average Target 13%
EPS Revisions
Thomas F. Farrell Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
Mark F. McGettrick Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President
P. Rodney Blevins Chief Information Officer & Senior Vice President
John W. Harris Lead Independent Director
Mark J. Kington Independent Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
DOMINION ENERGY-18.50%43 932
DUKE ENERGY CORP-7.64%54 423
IBERDROLA-2.85%49 646