Log in
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Dynamic quotes 

4-Traders Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nyse  >  Dominion Energy    D

Mes dernières consult.
Most popular
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsSector newsTweets

Principi: Alternatives for removal of coal ash are feasible

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
12/14/2017 | 07:38pm CET

Just in time for the holidays, the people of Prince William County received a gift from the Virginia General Assembly, in the form of an 800-page report analyzing the options for Dominion Energy's disposal of the hazardous coal ash stored in ponds at the Possum Point facility in Dumfries. The findings validate the environmental concerns surrounding the controversial cap-in-place method proposed by Dominion, and demonstrate that there are feasible alternatives with less environmental impact, including one that could generate economic growth. This report marked the latest step in a multi-year odyssey of community members, local and state officials and nonprofits working together to ensure that the coal ash dewatering and removal process is done in the most effective, environmentally sensitive and safe manner possible. To me, cost should not be the primary consideration in disposing of the coal ash. Rather, it should be protecting the residents who live on and around Possum Point Road, followed by ensuring that Dominion's removal of the coal ash – a highly toxic, cancer-causing byproduct of burning coal for fuel – occurs in the least intrusive manner while simultaneously protecting the environment, to include keeping pollutants out of Quantico Creek, the Potomac River and Chesapeake Bay.While there hasn't been time to fully digest the entirety of the report, there were several immediate takeaways that provide clarity and direction moving forward: First, we've learned that contaminants are leaking into the ground around the coal ash ponds. While Dominion contends that the contaminants haven't breached the ground wells of surrounding homes, these findings prove that cap-in-place is no longer a viable option. We cannot risk the possibility of contaminants further leaching into the ground and poisoning water sources. Second, the analyzed "alternative options" can be fully achieved within the 15-year window that the Environmental Protection Agency has set for coal ash pond closures. These findings dilute arguments that the alternative closure options are all unfeasible or impractical. In fact, the report makes the alternatives more attractive.Third, several promising alternatives are financially viable. This stands in direct contradiction to Dominion's assertion that alternatives to cap-in-place-such as moving coal ash to a fully lined landfill, removing and transporting it off-site or selling the ash to be repurposed in products such as bricks-are either unfeasible or cost-prohibitive. This report definitively proves that this simply isn't the case.Dominion estimates that its proposed cap-in-place option will take three to five years to complete and cost up to $418 million. Comparatively, relocating the coal ash to a lined landfill, which would dramatically reduce the possibility of leaching, would cost $380 million and take eight years.The prospect of environmental contamination makes both of these options unsatisfactory, in my opinion. Comparatively, the joint concept of removal, which on its own is the most expensive alternative, combined with reuse (fly ash, a coal ash byproduct, can be used to strengthen concrete and bricks) would take eight to 17 years and cost approximately $899 million. However, the cost could be offset by the construction of a new production facility that would bring with it the creation of dozens of new, high-paying jobs. Dominion is likely to make a profit from reuse. We are now equipped with a clearer picture of what can and should be done to protect people living near Possum Point, along with the surrounding land and waterways. I look forward to a continued dialogue with area residents, my colleagues on the Board of County Supervisors, the Prince William delegation in Richmond and Dominion officials to find an environmentally sound solution for closing the coal ash ponds in Prince William County.

Supervisor Frank Principi,

Woodbridge District

© Prince William Today © Copyright 2017, Sun Gazette Newspapers, Springfield, VA., source Newspapers

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
Latest news on DOMINION ENERGY
02:02a DOMINION ENERGY : SCE&G 'unlikely' to go bankrupt if rates slashed after nuclear..
01/19 DOMINION ENERGY : workers arrive in Puerto Rico sends workers to Puerto Rico
01/19 DOMINION ENERGY : ACP gets OK to drop trees
01/19 DOMINION ENERGY : Bills are filed to overhaul controversial 2015 utility rate fr..
01/19 DOMINION ENERGY : State lawmakers shouldn’t back Dominion’s ‘T..
01/19 DOMINION ENERGY : Should SC accept Dominion's buyout of SCANA? Lawmakers are ske..
01/18 DOMINION ENERGY : Boys & Girls Club receives Dominion Critical Needs Grant
01/18 DOMINION ENERGY : Only the good (bills) die young
01/18 DOMINION ENERGY : Senate committee kills campaign finance reform
01/18 CASEY : Some good bills the General Assembly has already killed
More news
News from SeekingAlpha
01/19 DOMINION ENERGY AND SCANA : Investors Hate 'Playing Chicken'
01/18 Buy Disney - Cramer's Lightning Round (1/17/18)
01/17 Dominion places nine power-generating units on reserve status
01/17 SCANA Is Losing Its Value
01/17 Dominion CEO says Scana deal off if cost recovery for Summer plant repealed
Financials ($)
Sales 2017 12 944 M
EBIT 2017 4 526 M
Net income 2017 2 277 M
Debt 2017 36 034 M
Yield 2017 4,05%
P/E ratio 2017 20,92
P/E ratio 2018 18,53
EV / Sales 2017 6,51x
EV / Sales 2018 6,00x
Capitalization 48 258 M
Duration : Period :
Dominion Energy Technical Analysis Chart | D | US25746U1097 | 4-Traders
Technical analysis trends DOMINION ENERGY
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
Income Statement Evolution
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 16
Average target price 81,4 $
Spread / Average Target 8,6%
EPS Revisions
Thomas F. Farrell Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
Mark F. McGettrick Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President
P. Rodney Blevins Chief Information Officer & Senior Vice President
Scot C. Hathaway Senior VP- Commercial Services, Gas Infrastructure
John W. Harris Independent Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
DUKE ENERGY CORP-6.78%54 134
IBERDROLA2.94%52 627