Log in
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Dynamic quotes 

4-Traders Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nyse  >  Dow Chemical Company (The)    

Mes dernières consult.
Most popular
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsofficial PublicationsSector newsTweets
OFFRE ETE Zonebourse : Jusqu'à 6 mois offerts sur tous les portefeuilles

DOW CHEMICAL : Modesto said chemical companies knew the groundwater was poisoned, so the city sued

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
01/14/2018 | 03:36am CEST

Jan. 13--In a ruling with implications for cities across the United States, appellate justices this week rejected Modesto's request to reinstate a $75 million judgment against a producer of toxic dry cleaning chemicals. However, the ruling also paves the way for a new trial under conditions favorable to Modesto.

City Attorney Adam Lindgren called the decision "a major victory for the city of Modesto in its long-running efforts and battle" against Dow Chemical Co. Dow claimed partial victory as well, and will consider appealing portions favoring Modesto, a company spokesman said Friday.

The ruling, dated Monday, is the latest in a legal war stretching two decades over who should be responsible for a chemical that polluted soil and groundwater under several dry cleaners sprinkled throughout Modesto.

"This case has followed a complex and tortuous path," acknowledged First Appellate District justices Maria Rivera, Ignazio Ruvolo and Jon Streeter, in the ruling.

Modesto drinking water is safe, officials have said throughout the years, but capturing the toxic chemical in soil vapor and keeping it from reaching the aquifer is expensive.

California became the first state to ban perchloroethylene, also called perc and PCE, in 2007, although dry cleaners have until 2023 to completely phase out PCE equipment. Perhaps half across California already have gone to other hydrocarbon- or water-based methods, said Peter Sinsheimer, executive director of UCLA's Sustainable Technology & Policy Program.

Modesto had become a poster child of sorts when the city in 1998 sued Dow and other PCE manufacturers and distributors. Although the firms had known for 20 years that PCE was dangerous, they had instructed dry cleaners to dispose of PCE waste in drains or simply on the ground, court documents say.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency calls PCE a "likely carcinogen" that destroys organs like livers and kidneys and attacks immune, reproductive and central nervous systems. One cup could contaminate 24 million gallons of groundwater, according to state health standards.

"In every case I'm aware of, the dry cleaners did not understand their activities would cause this risk," Sinsheimer said. "Primarily, the owners are first-generation immigrants trying to make a living as best they can, working really, really hard, and weren't aware this was an issue."

Modesto sued more than a dozen shops, and also opted to go after chemical manufacturers. Most settled before trial, bringing the city more than $37 million in settlements. That money has allowed City Hall over the years to collect 3,000 pounds of PCE at four properties formerly occupied by dry cleaners, Lindgren said.

But Dow and others "continued to insist they should not be held liable for contamination caused by PCE," Lindgren said.

A San Francisco jury stunned observers in 2006 by ordering Vulcan Materials Co. to pay Modesto$100 million, and Dow Chemical, based in Michigan, another $75 million, all in punitive damages. Shortly after, the judge reduced the penalties to $7.25 million and $5.44 million, respectively; Vulcan settled out of court in 2007, but Dow continued fighting and the legal battle eventually produced the equivalent of five trials and three appeals.

Among other issues, the city most recently sought to have the higher punitive damages award reinstated, while Dow hoped to have it erased.

Monday's latest ruling "establishes standards favorable to the city in further proceedings," Lindgren said. Such would take place in San Francisco, where other phases of the case have been held.

"We are pleased," Modesto Mayor Ted Brandvold said. "This will help protect Modesto residents, and places the costs of cleaning up PCE contamination where it belongs, which is on those responsible for the contamination."

Dow also "is pleased that the (First California) Court of Appeals correctly reversed the punitive damages verdict," spokesman Jarrod Erpelding said in an email. "Nevertheless, we are disappointed at the potential for more litigation in this very old case. Dow is considering all further appeal options."

The three justices, in Monday's ruling, said they were "loathe to overturn a jury's finding under any circumstances, and particularly a finding that punitive damages should be imposed due to the reprehensible conduct of a corporate actor." But they felt bound by "controlling legal principles" in erasing the damages, they said.

The justices noted the "protracted litigation and the lengthy delays that have beset this matter," adding "our own concerns about our already overburdened courts. We accordingly strongly encourage the parties to consider any and all creative approaches that might put an end to the litigation."

Dow sold most of its PCE production business two years ago.

Water-based laundering, also called wet cleaning, is environmentally friendly and just as effective at removing stains, including those on delicate apparel, Sinsheimer said.

The Bee's Kevin Valine contributed to this report.

Garth Stapley: 209-578-2390


(c)2018 The Modesto Bee (Modesto, Calif.)

Visit The Modesto Bee (Modesto, Calif.) at www.modbee.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

© Tribune Content Agency, source Regional News

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
01:56pDOW CHEMICAL : EPA Nominees Testify Before Senate EPW Committee
06/20DOW CHEMICAL : s Expansion Plans and New Investments
06/20DOW CHEMICAL : Judge awards Dow Chemical USD$1.06 billion in damages against Nov..
06/19DOW CHEMICAL : provides emergency assistance funds
06/19DOW CHEMICAL : opens Saudi innovation centre
06/19DOW CHEMICAL : DuPont spends $200M+ to create its future in historic Experimenta..
06/18AVERY DENNISON : R. Stanton Avery Pioneer Award goes to Alex Knott
06/16DOW CHEMICAL : Five people exposed to hazardous gas at Antioch plant
06/15DOW CHEMICAL : Manufacturing Leadership Council Honors Holicki & Three Other Dow..
06/15DOW CHEMICAL : to Invest in Flexible Alkoxylation Facility on U.S. Gulf Coast to..
More news
News from SeekingAlpha
2017Lean Long-Term Growth Portfolio - August 2017 Update 
2017Dow Chemical, DuPont complete merger to form DowDuPont 
2017JTA : Nifty Little Fund 
2017The Chemical Producer Set To Benefit The Most From Hurricane Harvey 
2017More than a third of U.S. chemical production shut by Harvey 
Duration : Period :
Dow Chemical Company (The) Technical Analysis Chart | US2605431038 | 4-Traders
Andrew N. Liveris Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
James R. Fitterling President & Chief Operating Officer
Howard I. Ungerleider Chief Financial Officer
Jeff M. Fettig Lead Independent Director
James M. Ringler Independent Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
DOWDUPONT-6.82%157 326
BASF-7.25%90 179
ROYAL DSM7.22%18 693