Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

4-Traders Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nyse  >  Johnson & Johnson    JNJ

SummaryQuotesChartsNewsAnalysisCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsSector newsTweets 

Corrected: Citi's pay rejection a wake-up call to boards

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
04/20/2012 | 09:07pm CET

Institutional investors are increasingly pressing boards to rein in outsized executive pay, and after Citigroup (>> Citigroup Inc.) shareholders rejected a compensation plan on Tuesday, more directors may start listening.

Institutional investors are increasingly pressing boards to rein in outsized executive pay, and after Citigroup (>> Citigroup Inc.) shareholders rejected a compensation plan on Tuesday, more directors may start listening.

Shareholders on Tuesday handed Citigroup an embarrassing no confidence vote on a $15 million pay package for its Chief Executive Vikram Pandit. About 55 percent of shareholders rejected a plan to bring Pandit's pay back close to levels before the global financial crisis.

The no vote signals dissatisfaction with lucrative pay at companies that have not lived up to industry standards, governance experts said.

"As we struggle to come out of the recession, CEO packages have continued to increase at a rate that is much greater than the rate of economic performance of these companies," said James Post, a management professor at Boston University.

That has become a flashpoint in a country that was already outraged over pay inequality, and many boards are paying attention, investors said.

"The culture of this country has shifted on this issue," said Eric Veiel, portfolio manager for T. Rowe Price's financial services fund.

Boards are following the public's lead and trends like last fall's "Occupy Wall Street" movement against wealth disparity, he said.

TOUGHER TEST IN 2012

Citigroup's shares are up 33 percent this year, but the bank still faces challenges, including failing to win approval from regulators for a dividend increase or stock buyback. On Monday it posted a 2 percent drop in net income for the first quarter as it struggled to boost profits in a sluggish economy.

The vote on Pandit's pay is nonbinding, but governance experts said it would be difficult for the board to ignore it.

"Everywhere on the political and social side we see a country that is terribly divided over compensation and economic inequality," said Post of Boston University. "CEOs are the poster children for this."

Shareholders won the right to vote on executive pay at most public companies with the 2010 Dodd-Frank act, though many observers were skeptical that the advisory votes would make much difference.

Average CEO pay fell during the recession, but surged in 2010 as a recovering stock market triggered more bonus awards. Preliminary data from Meridian Compensation Partners suggests pay rose more modestly in 2011.

While few companies had their pay plans rejected last year, they could face a tougher test in 2012, partly because institutional investors have had more time to fully prepare for the votes.

"It's not a matter of share owners sitting on their hands," said Anne Simpson, director of corporate governance for the California Public Employees' Retirement System, or Calpers. "Last year all of the big share owners like Calpers were working out their framework for analyzing these proposals."

Last year, only 41 companies failed to get majority support for their pay out of an estimated 2700 companies in the Russell 3000 index that held votes.

But roughly 160 additional companies got just 70 percent or less support for the measures, according to governance research firms that track the votes. Those companies could face more shareholder resistance if they did not reform their pay packages.

Some large asset managers lately have taken a more aggressive stand on pay questions and have been backing shareholder resolutions asking for pay changes.

Fidelity Investments of Boston supported 21 percent of shareholder resolutions related to pay last year, up from 8 percent in 2010 and 0.3 percent in 2009, according to Fund Votes, a Vancouver research firm.

Fidelity executives did not immediately respond to questions.

CALPERS GETS BOARDS ATTENTION

Calpers voted against 201 plans last year and has found those companies' boards responsive to its concerns, said Todd Mattley, head of proxy voting at the pension fund.

Companies that got over 50 percent no votes "are doing their homework and due diligence and really trying to figure out what was wrong with their compensation packages," he said.

Not everyone expects big changes as a result of the say-on-pay votes.

CEO pay has shot higher because board compensation committees base it largely on peer comparisons and usually aim to be a at least a bit above average, which means pay gets benchmarked to other companies' high levels, governance experts said.

"It's the overuse of peer groups that's created an upward spiral in pay," said Charles Elson, director of the Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. "Even the best compensation committee that uses a peer group is going to create problems."

But last year's rejections and scrutiny seem to have prompted some companies to change their plans before having them publicly reviewed in this year's votes, said Amy Borrus, deputy director of the Council of Institutional Investors, whose members have more than $3 trillion under management.

Johnson & Johnson (>> Johnson & Johnson), for example, modified its compensation plans after nearly 40 percent of votes were cast against it last year. The company replaced some cash incentives that had been in place more than 60 years with stock awards tied to sales, earnings and shareholder returns. A spokesman for the company declined to comment.

(Corrects school name to Boston University from Harvard University in paragraphs 4 and 10 in April 18 story.)

(Additional reporting by David Henry; Editing by Patricia Kranz and Leslie Gevirtz)

By Dena Aubin and Ross Kerber

Stocks treated in this article : Citigroup Inc., Johnson & Johnson
share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
Latest news on JOHNSON & JOHNSON
04:49p JOHNSON & JOHNSON : (JNJ) Falls with Earnings on Way
04:35p JOHNSON & JOHNSON : Stocks Edge Higher; Earnings, Home Sales In Focus - US Comme..
04:17p JOHNSON & JOHNSON : IFPMA supports the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innov..
03:47p JOHNSON & JOHNSON : - The ECHELON FLEX GST System Will Now Feature A 45mm Endocu..
03:03p JOHNSON & JOHNSON : Trump, Earnings In Focus As Wall Street Heads For Sluggish S..
02:21p MICROSOFT : Kenya to host a high level International Summit on 'Innovating Econo..
02:14p JOHNSON & JOHNSON : Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial Sta..
02:13p MICROSOFT : Kenya to host a high level International Summit on ‘Innovating..
01:38p JOHNSON & JOHNSON : cautious in outlook, shops diabetes care
01:30pDJJOHNSON & JOHNSON : Revenue Rises But Forecast Disappoints
More news
Sector news : Pharmaceuticals - NEC
12:35a U.S. reaches settlement with Endo on pay-for-delay charges
01/20 European shares ease ahead of Trump inauguration
01/20 Bristol-Myers shares fall on lung cancer timeline setback
01/19DJRival to EpiPen Allergy Treatment to Return to Market--Update
01/19DJRival to EpiPen Allergy Treatment to Return to Market
More sector news : Pharmaceuticals - NEC
News from SeekingAlpha
11:52a Pharma's Better Late Than Never Pricing Campaign
10:53a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON : And We're Off
09:14a BIOTECHNOLOGY : Can Trump Be A Catalyst?
08:38a Johnson & Johnson 2016 Q4 - Results - Earnings Call Slides
07:50a Johnson & Johnson revenues up 2%; earnings up 20%, non-GAAP EPS up 10% in Q4
Advertisement
Financials ($)
Sales 2016 72 031 M
EBIT 2016 22 001 M
Net income 2016 16 672 M
Finance 2016 16 909 M
Yield 2016 2,76%
P/E ratio 2016 19,28
P/E ratio 2017 17,05
EV / Sales 2016 4,07x
EV / Sales 2017 3,82x
Capitalization 309 896 M
More Financials
Chart JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Duration : Period :
Johnson & Johnson Technical Analysis Chart | JNJ | US4781601046 | 4-Traders
Full-screen chart
Technical analysis trends JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBullishBearishNeutral
Technical analysis
Income Statement Evolution
More Financials
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 23
Average target price 126 $
Spread / Average Target 10%
Consensus details
EPS Revisions
More Estimates Revisions
Managers
NameTitle
Alex Gorsky Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Dominic J. Caruso Chief Financial Officer & Vice President
Paulus Stoffels Chief Scientific Officer & Executive VP
Charles O. Prince Independent Director
William David Perez Independent Director
More about the company
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
JOHNSON & JOHNSON-1.13%309 896
ROCHE HOLDING LTD.0.39%200 025
PFIZER INC.-3.14%190 910
NOVARTIS AG-4.32%183 809
MERCK & CO., INC.4.99%170 419
SANOFI-1.66%103 847
More Results