Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

4-Traders Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nyse  >  Johnson & Johnson    JNJ

SummaryQuotesChartsNewsAnalysisCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsSector newsTweets

Johnson & Johnson : Doctors blame media for scaring patients off vaginal mesh implants

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
10/05/2017 | 07:14pm CEST

Inaccurate media reporting about vaginal mesh implants and the lawsuits associated with them has caused patients to become fearful of mesh procedures that may be essential to improving their health, New Zealand general surgeon Dr Steven Kelly says.

In a piece published in the New Zealand Medical Journal on Friday, Kelly said the media “have over previous years done great harm to the reputation of mesh abdominal wall and groin hernia repair”.

Concerns have been escalating after thousands of women around the world reported chronic pain, mesh cutting through tissue and being left unable to walk or have sex after having mesh surgery to repair urinary incontinence and prolapse – conditions often caused by childbirth.

Related: What does pelvic mesh do and why are women suing over it? – explainer

US pharmaceutical company Johnson & Johnson, a major manufacturer of mesh implants, is fighting class actions in Australia and the US, and could face legal proceedings in the UK.

But the media had “published multiple articles claiming that mesh is unsafe and unproven”, Kelly said. “That is simply not true,” he wrote. “Patients whom require abdominal wall hernia repair are now fearful of mesh. New Zealand general surgeons are well trained in modern hernia surgery and the management of complications.”

Most short-term clinical trials have found high efficacy and low complication rates for the most common mesh implants used to treat incontinence and hernias. But there is a growing body of evidence that efficacy is lower and complication rates are higher when the mesh, also known as transvaginal mesh, is used to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

“It is very important for the public to understand that transvaginal mesh repair has a different risk profile compared to abdominal wall mesh repair [to treat hernia],” Kelly wrote.

“Transvaginal mesh is placed into the vaginal wall in an attempt to treat pelvic organ prolapse. It was initially presumed to be as safe as abdominal wall hernia mesh repair. However, over time there were increasing reports of significant problems with this mesh technique, including mesh erosion, chronic pain, mesh infection and dyspareunia [painful intercourse].”

While many of the problematic meshes have been removed from the market, controversy remains among experts about the risk profile of contemporary meshes and how they should be utilised to treat prolapse. But Kelly said it was essential to also reassure people that the complication rate for abdominal wall hernia repair using mesh was low.

The president of the Australian Medical Association, Dr Michael Gannon, said even in the case of mesh used to treat prolapse, “a minority of women having these kinds of operations have been damaged”.

“One in eight women who have delivered vaginally will need an operation for either prolapse or incontinence, and using surgical tape or mesh may be a part of their legitimate care,” Gannon said.

Related: 'Scandal' of vaginal mesh removal rates revealed by NHS records

“We seem to have forgotten how many women have been helped by these operations over the journey in acknowledging that some may have been harmed by it.”

Gannon, who is an obstetrician, said he had been involved in the treatment of women who had been harmed by the meshes. Like Kelly, he said the media had been guilty of misrepresenting the scale of the problem.

“I have a lot of sympathy for the minority of women injured by gynaecological mesh operations; they have chronic pain and a lot of cases are very hard to fix,” he said.

“Stories like theirs are highly charged, emotional stories that make for good copy and its inevitable the media would report them. It’s less interesting to talk to a woman who had an operation five years ago and their lives have been made a whole lot better.”

More than 100,000 transvaginal mesh lawsuits have been filed in the US, while more than 700 women comprise the Australian class action. NHS records have revealed that thousands of women have undergone surgery to have vaginal mesh implants removed during the past decade in the UK due to traumatic complications linked to the devices.

The CEO of the Health Issues Centre in Australia, Danny Vadasz, said pointing out that the majority of women to undergo mesh procedures had not been harmed was an attempt to deflect attention away from the medical profession.

He used the example of the drug Thalidomide, prescribed to women to treat insomnia and morning sickness and which was subsequently found to have caused severe deformities in babies born to women on the drug.

“No one said, ‘Oh yes, but hundreds of thousands of women got a good night’s sleep on the drug, and that outweighs the harm’,” Vadasz said.

Related: Vaginal mesh lawsuit: executive denies prioritising Johnson & Johnson interests

Vadasz said while it may be the case that complication rates were much lower among those who had mesh procedures to treat hernia, “patronising” comments from doctors were not helpful.

“Doctors need to stop taking this patronising ‘we are the experts why aren’t you listening to us’ approach,” he said.

“My frustration is that I’m on various reference groups and government committees dealing with the mesh issue and this narrative of ‘we made mistakes in the past and its fine now’ keeps emerging. But it’s not fine.

“To me it’s a part of this larger, poor attitude towards women and not listening to women when they say something is wrong, and not explaining the risks to them so they can give informed consent to procedures.”

Copyright © 2017 theguardian.com. All rights reserved., source Guardian Online

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
Latest news on JOHNSON & JOHNSON
10/19 JOHNSON & JOHNSON : Janssen Submits New Drug Application to U.S. Food and Drug A..
10/19 JOHNSON & JOHNSON : The Fastest Growing Regions for Dermatological Drug Sales Ar..
10/19 JOHNSON & JOHNSON : Missouri court throws out $72M million verdict in Johnson & ..
10/19 JOHNSON & JOHNSON : Looking back on Black Monday, the stock market crash of 1987
10/19 Genmab Announces Net Sales of DARZALEX for Third Quarter of 2017
10/19 JOHNSON & JOHNSON : and Reports 2017 Third Quarter Results
10/19 ENDOLOGIX, INC. (NASDAQ : ELGX) Files An 8-K Departure of Directors or Certain O..
10/19 JOHNSON & JOHNSON : Earnings Review and Free Research Report: Johnson & Johnson ..
10/19 JOHNSON & JOHNSON : Announces Quarterly Dividend for Fourth Quarter 2017
10/19 JOHNSON & JOHNSON : Medical GmbH to Acquire Surgical Process Institute
More news
News from SeekingAlpha
10/19 Is It Time To Take Profits On Johnson & Johnson?
10/19 Retiring In Your 50s Might Be Easier Than You Think
10/19 Alcobra up 46% premarket on Arcturus/Janssen deal in HBV
10/19 Market Is Not Waiting For Tax Reform - Cramer's Mad Money (10/18/17)
10/19 Johnson & Johnson to acquire Surgical Process Institute
Financials ($)
Sales 2017 76 224 M
EBIT 2017 23 484 M
Net income 2017 15 953 M
Debt 2017 16 378 M
Yield 2017 2,38%
P/E ratio 2017 24,13
P/E ratio 2018 19,71
EV / Sales 2017 5,17x
EV / Sales 2018 4,79x
Capitalization 378 B
Chart JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Duration : Period :
Johnson & Johnson Technical Analysis Chart | JNJ | US4781601046 | 4-Traders
Technical analysis trends JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsBullishBullishBullish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 22
Average target price 144 $
Spread / Average Target 2,3%
EPS Revisions
Managers
NameTitle
Alex Gorsky Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Dominic J. Caruso Chief Financial Officer & Vice President
Paulus Stoffels Chief Scientific Officer & Executive VP
Charles O. Prince Independent Director
William David Perez Independent Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
JOHNSON & JOHNSON22.11%377 585
NOVARTIS13.50%226 453
ROCHE HOLDING LTD.5.55%215 760
PFIZER10.31%213 372
MERCK AND COMPANY7.88%173 214
AMGEN27.41%135 924