Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.:

  • Do you, or did you, own shares of MiMedx Group, Inc. (NASDAQ CM: MDXG)?
  • Did you purchase your shares between February 26, 2014 and December 31, 2014, inclusive?
  • Did you lose money in your investment in MiMedx Group, Inc.?
  • Do you want to discuss your rights?

Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., including former Special Assistant United States Attorney, Timothy J. MacFall, reminds shareholders of MiMedx Group, Inc. (“MiMedx” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ CM: MDXG) of an upcoming deadline involving a securities fraud class action lawsuit commenced against the Company.

A complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of all persons or entities that purchased the common stock of MiMedx between February 26, 2014 and December 31, 2014, inclusive (the “Class Period”), alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the Company and certain of its officers (the “Complaint”). If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 20, 2015.

If you purchased shares of MiMedx during the Class Period, or purchased shares prior to the Class Period and still hold MiMedx, and wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire or Peter Allocco of Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., 825 East Gate Boulevard, Suite 300, Garden City, NY at (888) 969-4242, by e-mail to info@rl-legal.com, or at: http://www.rigrodskylong.com/investigations/mimedx-group-inc-mdxg-lawsuit.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements, and omitted materially adverse facts, about the Company’s business, operations and prospects. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that the defendants concealed from the investing public that: (1) the Company was in violation of federal regulations by engaging in improper marketing and sales practices; and (2) as a result of the foregoing, the Company’s statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. As a result of defendants’ false and misleading statements, the Company’s stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period.

According to the Complaint, on December 31, 2014, after the close of trading, the Company issued a press release announcing the receipt of a civil subpoena from the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services. Moreover, the Company announced the same day that it has filed a federal tortious interference lawsuit against one of its competitors for tortious interference of contract, alleging that it had interfered with MiMedx’s dealings with the Veterans Administration.

On this news, shares in MiMedx dropped more than 15%, closing at $9.74 per share on January 2, 2015, on unusually heavy trading volume of over 5.4 million shares.

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 20, 2015. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member’s claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the class member will adequately represent the class. Your ability to share in any recovery is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. Any member of the proposed class may move the court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.

While Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. did not file the Complaint in this matter, the firm, with offices in Wilmington, Delaware and Garden City, New York, regularly litigates securities class, derivative and direct actions, shareholder rights litigation and corporate governance litigation, including claims for breach of fiduciary duty and proxy violations in the Delaware Court of Chancery and in state and federal courts throughout the United States.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.