Log in
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Dynamic quotes 

4-Traders Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nasdaq  >  Tesla    TSLA

Mes dernières consult.
Most popular
Delayed Quote. Delayed  - 09/22 10:00:00 pm
351.09 USD   -4.20%
11:45aDJTESLA : China Eyeing Rule Change That Could Aid Tesla
02:36a ROAD RUNNER : Tucson to get its first Tesla Supercharger station
09/22 TESLA : Electric vehicle exhibit
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsSector newsTweets

Tesla : Legislators wouldn't penalize Tesla for operating in California. Would they?

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
09/13/2017 | 02:08am CEST

Sept. 12--California's last big auto manufacturer, a General Motors-Toyota joint venture, closed its Fremont factory in 2010. This year, Toyota is vacating its North American headquarters in suburban Los Angeles as it decamps to Texas.

Yet in the final week of this legislative session, lawmakers inserted language that takes aim at Tesla Motors, the upstart that builds its electric vehicles in the Fremont factory that Toyota and GM abandoned.

As legislative language goes, it's mild. But it suggests that an auto maker that runs afoul of the fine print could lose out on $140 million in rebates issued to consumers who want to help fight climate change by purchasing zero-emission vehicles.

The amendment directs the Air Resources Board to work with the Labor and Workforce Development Agency to "develop procedures for certifying" that companies that make autos that qualify for rebates are "fair and responsible in the treatment of their workers."

Further, the Legislature's "intent" is that the state labor secretary will "certify [auto] manufacturers as fair and responsible in the treatment of their workers" before companies' vehicles qualify for the rebate program.

Legislators are within their rights to tie rebates to state-only standards. But the language, part of broader legislation, Assembly Bill 134, to divvy up $1.5 billion in cap-and-trade revenue, emerged in the final week of the legislative session, rarely a good sign. Why not include it in separate legislation, subject to full legislative review?

Although the bill is aimed at Tesla, the Alliance of Automobile Manufactures, which represents Ford, GM, Toyota, .Fiat and others, opposes the language. The Global Automakers, which represents Nissan, called the amendment "counterproductive to building a sustainable market for zero emission vehicles."

Counterproductive or not, Gov. Jerry Brown, the internationally recognized champion of the fight against climate change, blessed the deal, The Sacramento Bee'sJim Miller reported.

We support treating workers fairly and responsibly. We believe Tesla probably would gain market share if it attained labor peace. But what exactly constitutes "fair and responsible" treatment? Why limit the standard to cars makers? Why not include manufacturers of zero-emission buses, and bio-digesters, and any company that receives cap-and-trade revenue?

And why should lawmakers step into the middle of a labor dispute with Tesla?

If the language becomes law, California would need to enforce it equally, whether zero-emission vehicles are made in Fremont, or Michigan, orright-to-work states, or foreign countries. How state regulators here would enforce workplace standards in far-flung plants remains to be seen.

As is their right, Tesla and its founder Elon Musk are fighting the United Autoworkers' organizing effort. The National Labor Relations Board detailed Tesla's rough tactics in a complaint two weeks ago.

Most definitely, Musk rubs some officials here wrong. His company benefited mightily from California subsidies and from consumers' green attitudes, but Musk located his battery factory in Nevada three years ago.

Nonetheless, Tesla employs 10,000 Californians in Fremont, unlike Toyota, GM, Ford, Nissan and all the others without factories here. It's as if lawmakers are penalizing Tesla for operating in this state. They wouldn't do that. Would they?


(c)2017 The Sacramento Bee (Sacramento, Calif.)

Visit The Sacramento Bee (Sacramento, Calif.) at www.sacbee.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

© Tribune Content Agency, source Regional News

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
Latest news on TESLA
11:45aDJTESLA : China Eyeing Rule Change That Could Aid Tesla
02:36a ROAD RUNNER : Tucson to get its first Tesla Supercharger station
09/22 TESLA : This Is Your Brain On Tesla
09/22 TESLA : Electric vehicle exhibit
09/22 Exclusive - Volkswagen moves to secure cobalt supplies in shift to electric c..
09/22 TESLA : Today's Research Reports on Stocks to Watch: Tesla and Advanced Micro De..
09/22 GENERAL MOTORS : Rise of sustainable electric automobiles and the end of petrol ..
09/22 ANALYSIS : What the future holds for VW Chattanooga
09/21 Q : I own a Tesla Roadster
09/21 TESLA : Patent Issued for Energy Storage System with Heat Pipe Thermal Managemen..
More news
News from SeekingAlpha
05:38a TESLA : Big News Next Week
09/23 WSJ : Tesla's small DoJ settlement should spark big concern for investors
09/22 AMD And Nvidia Are Still Undervalued
09/22 Tesla's Bad Decisions Keep Coming
09/22 Will Tesla Report September Quarter Model 3 Deliveries?
Financials ($)
Sales 2017 11 872 M
EBIT 2017 -807 M
Net income 2017 -1 468 M
Debt 2017 4 867 M
Yield 2017 -
P/E ratio 2017 -
P/E ratio 2018
EV / Sales 2017 5,35x
EV / Sales 2018 3,31x
Capitalization 58 592 M
Duration : Period :
Tesla Technical Analysis Chart | TSLA | US88160R1014 | 4-Traders
Technical analysis trends TESLA
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
Income Statement Evolution
Mean consensus HOLD
Number of Analysts 22
Average target price 316 $
Spread / Average Target -10,0%
EPS Revisions
Elon Reeve Musk Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Deepak Ahuja Chief Financial Officer
Jeffrey B. Straubel Chief Technology Officer
Gary Clark Chief Information Officer
Kimbal Musk Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
TESLA64.30%58 592
TOYOTA MOTOR CORP-2.09%196 124
DAIMLER-5.83%85 152
VOLKSWAGEN3.19%84 622