White Cliff Minerals : Drilling Commences - Laverton Gold Targets

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

Sampling Techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random

chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling

This ASX Release dated 8 July 2015 reports on

exploration results from of the Company's 2014-15 RAB drilling program carried out across part of the Laverton project area.

RAB Sampling: All samples from the RAB drilling are taken as 4m composite samples. Samples are sent to Bureau Veritas Laboratories for assaying. Appropriate QAQC samples (standards, blanks and duplicates) are inserted into the sequences as per industry best practice. Samples are collected using spear sampling.

Geological logging of RAB chips is completed at site with representative chips being stored in drill chip trays.

Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

The sample collar locations are picked up by handheld GPS. Soil samples were logged for landform, and sample contamination. Sampling was carried out under standard industry protocols and QAQC procedures

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain

1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is

coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems.

Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

All samples will be analyzed by Aqua Regia digest followed by ICP-MS for gold.

Drilling Techniques

Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole

hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).

Rotary Air Blast to depths of up to 50 metres or maximum

penetration of blade bit.

Drill sample recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample

recoveries and results assessed

Visual assessment of variability of sample spoil

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure

representative nature of the samples.

No measures undertaken. RAB is a first pass assessment

tool that is not used for quantitative results

Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

Not assessed

Logging

Whether core and chip samples have been geologically

and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

Rock chips samples are logged for lithology, colour,

quartz percentage, minerals and sulphide.

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature.

Core (or costean, channel, etc) Photography

Logging is quantitative in nature with each metre of

recovered drill sample assessed

The total length and percentage of the relevant

intersections logged.

The entire recovered sample is assessed

Sub-sampling techniques and

sample preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

Not Applicable- no core drilling was carried out

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc

and whether sampled wet or dry.

Samples were collected via tube sampling. Samples

taken were dry. i

For all sample types, the nature, quality and

appropriateness of the sample preparation technique

Samples were collected directly from the each metre of

drill sample using a sampling tube. The sample provides a qualitative indication of mineralisation only.

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling

stages to maximise representivity of samples

At this stage of the exploration no sub sampling is

undertaken

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected,

including for instance results for field duplicate/second- half sampling

The whole sample collected is pulverised and analysed. Field duplicates are not routinely collected at the RAB sampling stage of exploration

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of

the material being sampled

The sample sizes are considered to be appropriate to

correctly represent the sought after mineralisation style

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

Quality of assay data

and laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying

and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

The analytical techniques used Aqua Regia digest with

ICP/MS finish, suitable for the reconnaissance style sampling undertaken.

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

Samples were analysed with a Innovex portable XRF instrument using a 60 second analysis time. Calibration checks were carried out against a nickel standard every

50 samples. Samples were tested three times and the average reading recorded. The standard deviation of the three reading has been recorded

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established

A selection the samples have had the XRF results repeated a second time to verify and elevated samples will be checked against Laboratory analysis. The Laboratory will analyse the samples via Aqua Regia with ICP-OES finish.

Laboratory QAQC involves the use of internal lab standards using certified reference material, blanks, splits and replicates as part of the in house procedures.

Verification of sampling and

assaying

The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

Significant intersections in soil samples have been verified by an executive director of the Company

The use of twinned holes

Not Applicable

Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures,

data verification, data storage (physical and electronic)

protocols

Primary data was collected using a set of standard Excel

templates on paper and re-entered into laptop computers. The information was sent to WCN in-house database manager for validation and compilation into an Access database.

Discuss any adjustment to assay data

No adjustments or calibrations were made to any assay data used in this report.

Location of data

points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes

(collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

Sample locations were recorded using handheld Garmin

GPS. Elevation values were in AHD RL and values recorded within the database. Expected accuracy is + or

- 5 m for easting, northing and 10m for elevation coordinates.

No down hole surveying techniques were used due to the sampling methods used.

Specification of the grid system used.

The grid system is MGA_GDA94 (zone 51)

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

Topographic surface uses handheld GPS elevation data, which is adequate at the current stage of the project.

Data spacing and

distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

The nominal drill hole spacing is 50-100 m (northing) by

25-50 m (easting) at the red Flag East prospect and 50m by 25m for the Red Flag West prospect.

Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

The mineralised domains have not yet demonstrated sufficient continuity in both geological and grade continuity to support the definition of Mineral Resource and Reserves, and the classifications applied under the

2012 JORC Code.

Whether sample compositing has been applied.

Not applicable

Orientation of data in

relation to geological structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased

sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

The RAB sampling method is used to provide an

indicative location of mineralised structure down the hole.

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the

orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material

No orientation based sampling bias has been identified in

the data at this point.

Sample security

The measures taken to ensure sample security.

Sample security is managed by the Company. Since at this stage these are field analyses, no sample transit

security has been necessary.

Audits of reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of sampling

techniques and data.

The Company carries out its own internal data audits. No

problems have been detected.

Criteria

Explanation

Commentary

Mineral tenement and

land tenure status

Type, reference name/number, location and ownership

including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

The sample positions occur is located within Exploration

Licenses E39/1585 which are 100% owned by White Cliff

Minerals Limited or a subsidiary

Criteria

Explanation

Commentary

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting

along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

The tenements are in good standing and no known

impediments exist.

Exploration done by

other parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other

parties.

Extensive historical exploration for gold and nickel

mineralisation has been carried out by Placer Dome, Homestake and their predecessors. Occurrences of gold mineralisation were identified but was not followed up

Geology

Deposit type, geological setting and style of

mineralisation.

The geological setting is of Archaean aged mafic and

ultramafic sequences intruded by mafic to felsic porphyries and granitoids. Mineralisation is mostly situated within the regolith profile of the mafic and sedimentary units. The rocks are strongly talc-carbonate altered. Metamorphism is mid-upper Greenschist facies. The target mineralisation has yet to be identified but is analogous to Archean lode gold deposits common in the north eastern gold fields of WA.

Drill Hole Information

A summary of all information material to the

understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:

Drilling is currently underway so a summary is not yet

available

easting and northing of the drill hole collar

elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation

above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar

dip and azimuth of the hole

down hole length and interception depth

hole length.

If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis

that the information is not

Data Aggregation

methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging

techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

No length weighting has been applied due to the nature

of the sampling technique. No top-cuts have been applied.

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of

high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such

aggregations should be shown in detail.

Not applicable for the sampling methods used.

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal

equivalent values should be clearly stated

No metal equivalent values are used for reporting

exploration results.

Relationship between

mineralisation widths and intercept lengths

These relationships are particularly important in the

reporting of Exploration Results:

If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are

reported, there should be a clear statement to this

effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known').

The sampling technique used defines a down hole

geochemical expression. No information is attainable relating to the geometry of any mineralisation based on these results.

Diagrams

Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and

tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views`

Refer to figs. in the body of text.

Balanced Reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results

is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results

All results are reported.

Other substantive

exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should

be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

NIL

Further Work

The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests

for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

AC or RC drilling will be used to further define the nature

and extent of the geochemical anomalism, and to gain lithological information.