White Rock Mineral's Mt Carrington gold-silver-copper project, 5km from Drake in northern New South Wales, now presents a compelling case for further detailed exploration as a result of the first pass drilling. This recent drilling has defined a large zone of sulphide alteration that extends the system over
2km west of previous known limits, and to a depth of at least 800 metres.
The initial three drill hole program on a previously unidentified anomaly has confirmed the validity of the deep penetrating IP technique (MIMDAS) with each drill hole intersecting extensive disseminated pyrite alteration of sufficient intensity and distribution to explain the chargeability response. The alteration and chargeability anomalies are open to the north, west and south, and open at depth, presenting significant potential for future mineralisation discovery. The success of the IP technique provides confidence in further defining the system with follow-up IP in conjunction with more detailed analytical studies on the drill core to help vector towards the source of mineralisation.
Anomalous copper, gold and pathfinder element results have confirmed that the large alteration zone encountered in drilling is an extension of the mineralising system that contains numerous copper, gold and silver workings in addition to the known Resources that form part of the Mt Carrington development project. Results for all three recently completed drill holes are presented in Table 2.
Chief Operating Officer ("COO") Matthew Gill commented: "The White Rock technical team is encouraged that such a large alteration system has been defined in addition to the known gold-silver Resources at Mt Carrington. The new extension presents a significant area of prospectivity with no previous drilling having been completed beyond the three recent drill holes. Such exploration potential now provides significant upside to any future development of the Mt Carrington project and reinforces our motivation to ensure that the value of the project is unlocked."
White Rock plans to evaluate the drill core using techniques developed in recent years that will assist with establishing the potential of the hydrothermal system and provide vectors to help target mineralisation. These techniques include sulphur isotopes, white mica crystallinity and chlorite chemistry, each of which will aid in further understanding whether a copper-gold porphyry system is driving the alteration. In addition, this information will also identify further epithermal gold targets at shallow levels that could augment the existing gold-silver resource development plans now the focus of feasibility studies.
White Rock is also in discussions to define complimentary Masters and PhD projects with leading Australian Universities that will assist in ensuring the latest techniques are executed in advancing the exploration of the whole mineralised system at Mt Carrington.
White Rock is pleased to acknowledge the NSW Government's co-funding drilling initiative program, from which the Company will be reimbursed approximately $140,000 of direct drilling costs.
For further information, please contact: Matthew Gill (Chief Operating Officer) Phone: 03 5331 4644
E-mail: info@whiterockminerals.com.au
Andrew Dart (Company Secretary) Phone: 03 5331 4644
Website: www.whiterockminerals.com.au
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results or Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Mr Rohan Worland who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and is a consultant to White Rock Minerals Ltd. Mr Worland has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Worland consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Geophysical information in this report is based on exploration data compiled by Mr Terry Hoschke who is employed as a Consultant to the Company through the geophysical consultancy Alterrex Pty Ltd. Mr Hoschke is a member of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists with sufficient experience of relevance to the styles of mineralisation and the types of deposits under consideration, and activities undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012
Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Hoschke consents to the inclusion in the report of matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.
About White Rock Minerals
White Rock is an Australian minerals exploration company focussed on the discovery and development of shallow
gold, silver and copper deposits in the New England Fold Belt, northern NSW. White Rock's cornerstone asset is the
100% owned Mt Carrington project located 5 km from the township of Drake in northern NSW, 4 hour's drive SW of
Brisbane and 2 hours west from Ballina. The Mt Carrington Project hosts shallow Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources totalling 338,000oz gold and 23.5Moz silver on granted Mining Leases with significant mining infrastructure in place. Exploration at Mt Carrington is in progress to generate and drill test a number of prospective near-mine copper and gold targets within a tenement area of 470km2 covering the under-explored Drake Volcanics.
Market Capitalisation: A$7m @ A$0.031/share
Issued Capital: 226m Ordinary shares, 7m Unlisted options (June 2015)
Balance Sheet: $0.6M, no debt (March 2015)
Shareholders Avalon Ventures Corporation | 36.80% | Board and Management • Brian Phillips - Non-Executive Chairman |
Greenstone Property Pty Ltd | 10.30% | • Geoffrey Lowe - Non-Executive Director |
Lion Capital Advisory Pty Ltd | 5.02% | • Peter Lester - Non-Executive Director |
Titeline Services Pty Ltd | 2.76% | • Matthew Gill - Chief Operating Officer |
Grand South Development Ltd | 1.40% | • Andrew Dart - Company Secretary & CFO |
TOP 20 | 68% | • Rohan Worland - Exploration Manager |
Resources: The Mineral Resource inventory for Mt Carrington is contained in 8 separate gold and silver deposits (Figure
4) - Kylo, Strauss, Guy Bell, Red Rock, Lady Hampden, Silver King, White Rock and White Rock North deposits. The updated
Resource estimate for all deposits at the Mt Carrington Project totals 0.34Moz Au and 23.5Moz Ag.
MT CARRINGTON INDICATED & INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCE SUMMARY | |||||
Gold Dominant Resources | |||||
Resource Category | Tonnes | Au (g/t) | Gold Oz | Ag (g/t) | Silver Oz |
Indicated | 2,830,000 | 1.3 | 116,000 | 3.1 | 286,000 |
Inferred | 3,810,000 | 1.3 | 158,000 | 2.9 | 353,000 |
Indicated & Inferred | 6,640,000 | 1.3 | 275,000 | 3.0 | 639,000 |
Silver Dominant Resources | |||||
Resource Category | Tonnes | Au (g/t) | Gold Oz | Ag (g/t) | Silver Oz |
Indicated | 3,550,000 | 0.3 | 37,000 | 72 | 8,270,000 |
Inferred | 8,950,000 | 0.1 | 27,000 | 51 | 14,533,000 |
Indicated & Inferred | 12,500,000 | 0.2 | 64,000 | 57 | 22,803,000 |
Total Resources | |||||
Total | 19,140,000 | 338,000 | 23,442,000 |
Mt Carrington Project - Mineral Resource Summary.
*Competent Persons Report (continued)
The gold and silver Resource figures for White Rock, Red Rock, Strauss, Kylo, Lady Hampden, Silver King and White Rock North have been taken from Resource estimates of February 2012, July 2013 and November 2013 prepared by Ravensgate Minerals Industry Consultants on behalf of White Rock Minerals Ltd and authored by Mr Don Maclean. Mr Maclean is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he has undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves." Mr Maclean consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears. This information was prepared and first disclosed under the JORC Code 2004 as per ASX releases by White Rock Minerals Ltd on 13 February 2012, 11 July 2013 and 20
November 2013. The Resources figures have not been updated since to comply with the JORC Code 2012 on the basis
that the information has not materially changed since it was last reported. The gold and silver Resource figures for Guy Bell have been taken from the Resource estimate of October 2008 prepared by Mining One Pty Ltd on behalf of Rex Minerals Ltd and authored by Dr Chris Gee who is a professional geologist with more than 10 years' experience in resource estimation. Dr Gee is a Competent Person as defined by the JORC Code. Mr Gee consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears. This information was prepared and first disclosed under the JORC Code 2004 as per the ASX release by Rex Minerals Ltd on 10 December
2008. The Resources figures have not been updated since to comply with the JORC Code 2012 on the basis that the information has not materially changed since it was last reported.
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques | | Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole | | All drilling is PQ, HQ or NQ diamond core from surface. Sampling is undertaken on selected 1m intervals unless defined otherwise by geological characteristics. Core is split in half (or ¼ core for PQ) by automated core |
gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. | saw to obtain a 3-4.5kg sample for external laboratory preparation and analysis. The oriented portion is retained for future reference. | |||
| Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse | | Based on the grain size and distribution of mineralisation the sample size and mass is considered adequate for representative sampling. Sampling accuracy and representativeness is ensured through comprehensive geotechnical and geological logging and oriented sampling along the apex of relevant mineralisation and veining. | |
circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m | ||||
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to | ||||
produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other | ||||
cases more explanation may be required, such | ||||
as where there is coarse gold that has inherent | ||||
sampling problems. Unusual commodities or | ||||
mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) | ||||
may warrant disclosure of detailed information. | ||||
Drilling techniques | | Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). | | All drilling is PQ, HQ or NQ diamond core from surface. Chrome barrels are used to maintain hole orientations. Triple tube is implemented as warranted by ground conditions. All diamond core is oriented via an Islex Orifinder tool. |
Drill sample | | Method of recording and assessing core and | | Drilling methods are selected to ensure maximum |
recovery | chip sample recoveries and results assessed. | recovery possible. The maximum core length possible in | ||
| Measures taken to maximise sample recovery | competent ground is 3.1m. | ||
and ensure representative nature of the | | Drill run measurements and core loss are initially | ||
samples. | recorded by the drilling contractor. Detailed geotechnical | |||
| Whether a relationship exists between sample | logging includes metre mark-ups and the measurement | ||
recovery and grade and whether sample bias | of actual core length against run lengths recorded by the | |||
may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain | drilling contractor. Any recorded core loss or recovery | |||
of fine/coarse material. | measurements with >10% variance from expected | |||
interval lengths is automatically flagged by data entry | ||||
procedures prior to validation by the supervising | ||||
geologist. Core recoveries for all drilled intervals are | ||||
typically greater than 95%. | ||||
| All diamond core is oriented, which allows correct | |||
positioning of core in the trays for accurate metre | ||||
measurements. Any orientation discrepancies are | ||||
documented and resolved with the supervising geologist | ||||
and drilling contractor. | ||||
| A link between sample recovery and grade is not | |||
apparent. No significant loss of fines or core has been | ||||
noted. Mineralisation is hosted in competent siliceous | ||||
ground with negligible oxide/supergene mineralisation | ||||
and limited soft ground. | ||||
| Any contamination, potential contamination or areas of | |||
poor recovery are noted and flagged in the database. | ||||
Logging | | Whether core and chip samples have been | | All diamond core undergoes geotechnical and geological |
geologically and geotechnically logged to a level | logging to a level of detail (quantitative and qualitative) | |||
of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource | sufficient to support use of the data in all categories of | |||
estimation, mining studies and metallurgical | Mineral Resource estimation. Logging includes | |||
studies. | stratigraphy, lithology, colour, weathering, grain size, | |||
| Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in | volcanic type, clast type, clast size, roundness, textural | ||
nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) | features, brecciation type, alteration type and intensity, | |||
photography. | mineralogy, mineralisation, vein type, vein texture, | |||
| The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. | proportion of vein components, sulphide and quartz proportion per metre, structure, recovery, breaks per metre, rock quality designation, magnetic susceptibility | ||
and specific gravity. | ||||
| All core is photographed. |
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sub-sampling techniques and sample | | If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary | | Diamond core is split in half (or ¼ core for PQ) by automated core saw to obtain a 3 - 4.5kg sample for external laboratory preparation by ALS Brisbane where it |
preparation | split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. | is dried, crushed to 70% passing -6mm, riffle split to | ||
| For all sample types, the nature, quality and | ~3kg then pulverised to 85% passing -75micron. | ||
appropriateness of the sample preparation | | The oriented half core portion is retained for future | ||
technique. | reference. | |||
| Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- | | Quality control procedures include laboratory-prepared, | |
sampling stages to maximise representivity of | crushed duplicate samples of half core (1 in 50 | |||
samples. | samples). Variations outside of specifications are | |||
| Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field | queried with the laboratory to determine the cause and errors mitigated through re-assaying of retained samples as a first step. | ||
duplicate/second-half sampling. | | Sampling techniques and laboratory preparation | ||
| Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. | methods are considered to be industry standard and/or best practice, are relevant to the material being sampled and are suitable for Mineral Resource estimation | ||
purposes. | ||||
Quality of | | The nature, quality and appropriateness of the | | All diamond core samples were submitted to ALS |
assay data | assaying and laboratory procedures used and | Brisbane for analysis. Au is assayed by technique Au- | ||
and laboratory | whether the technique is considered partial or | AA25 (30g by fire assay and AAS with a 0.01ppm | ||
tests | total. | detection limit). Multi-element suite of 33 elements | ||
| For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld | including Ag is assayed by technique ME-ICP61 (0.25g | ||
XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in | charge by four acid digest and ICP-AES finish with a | |||
determining the analysis including instrument | 0.5ppm Ag detection limit). | |||
make and model, reading times, calibrations | | Fire assay for Au by technique Au-AA25 is considered | ||
factors applied and their derivation, etc. | total. Multi-element assay by technique ME-ICP61 is | |||
| Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg | considered near-total for all but the most resistive | ||
standards, blanks, duplicates, external | minerals (not of relevance). | |||
laboratory checks) and whether acceptable | | The nature and quality of the analytical technique is | ||
levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision | deemed appropriate for the mineralisation style. | |||
have been established. | | Blanks, standards (relevant certified reference material) | ||
and crushed core duplicate samples are inserted at | ||||
regular intervals (minimum 6 in 100 sample spacing). | ||||
Blanks are placed at the start of the batch and before | ||||
duplicate samples. | ||||
| Additional blanks, standards and pulp duplicates are | |||
analysed as part of laboratory QAQC and calibration | ||||
protocols | ||||
| All QAQC results are reviewed on a batch by batch | |||
basis. | ||||
| Internal and external (geochemical consultant) reviews | |||
of all QAQC results are undertaken periodically. | ||||
| No external laboratory checks have been completed. | |||
| Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision have been | |||
established for all assay data used in this report. | ||||
| No handheld XRF values are reported. | |||
Verification of | | The verification of significant intersections by | | All assay results are checked and verified by alternative |
sampling and | either independent or alternative company | company personnel. Significant assay results prompt a | ||
assaying | personnel. | visual review of relevant reference core for validation | ||
| The use of twinned holes. | purposes. | ||
| Documentation of primary data, data entry | | No twinned holes have been completed in this report. | |
procedures, data verification, data storage | | All data is logged digitally or via paper and subsequently | ||
(physical and electronic) protocols. | entered digitally. Logging forms contain strict protocols | |||
| Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | for regimented coding via locked spreadsheets. | ||
| All drilling logs are validated by the supervising | |||
geologist. | ||||
| Logging errors are held in quarantine until checked, | |||
updated and validated. | ||||
| All hard copy data is filed and stored. Digital data is filed | |||
and stored on a server with routine local and remote | ||||
backups. | ||||
| No adjustment to assay data is undertaken. |
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
procedure(s) and classifications applied.
APPENDIX 2 Reporting of Exploration ResultsCriteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure | | Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, | | The Mt Carrington Project comprises 22 Mining Leases and 4 Exploration Licences. All mining and exploration tenements are 100% owned |
status | partnerships, overriding royalties, native title | and operated by White Rock (MTC) Pty Ltd, a 100% | ||
interests, historical sites, wilderness or national | owned subsidiary of White Rock Minerals Limited. | |||
park and environmental settings. | | The exploration results reported here are on EL6273 and | ||
| The security of the tenure held at the time of | ML 1147. | ||
reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | | One active Native Title claim is registered over the area (NNTT #NC11/5). | ||
| All of the mining and exploration tenements are granted. | |||
| No other known impediments to the tenement and | |||
tenure situation exist. | ||||
Exploration | | Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by | | The Mount Carrington project has seen significant |
done by other | other parties. | exploration conducted by Carpentaria Exploration, | ||
parties | Mount Carrington Mines, Newmont, Aberfoyle, CRA, | |||
Drake Resources and predecessor company Rex | ||||
Minerals, as well as less significant work by a number of | ||||
other operators. | ||||
| All historical work has been reviewed, appraised and | |||
integrated into the current database where of sufficient | ||||
quality, relevance and applicability. | ||||
Geology | | Deposit type, geological setting and style of | | Porphyry copper-gold and low sulphidation epithermal |
mineralisation. | gold-silver mineralisation. | |||
| Host rocks are rhyolitic to andesitic volcanics and | |||
volcaniclastics of the Permian Drake Volcanics. | ||||
| Mineralisation is typically hosted by sheeted to | |||
stockwork style quartz veining, breccia fill and minor | ||||
massive silicified zones within phyllic to silicic alteration | ||||
zones. | ||||
Drill hole | | A summary of all information material to the | | See Table 1 for location details of all drill holes in this |
Information | understanding of the exploration results | report. | ||
including a tabulation of the following information | ||||
for all Material drill holes: | ||||
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar | ||||
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation | ||||
above sea level in metres) of the drill hole | ||||
collar | ||||
o dip and azimuth of the hole | ||||
o down hole length and interception depth | ||||
o hole length. | ||||
| If the exclusion of this information is justified on | |||
the basis that the information is not Material and | ||||
this exclusion does not detract from the | ||||
understanding of the report, the Competent | ||||
Person should clearly explain why this is the | ||||
case. | ||||
Data | | In reporting Exploration Results, weighting | | All Exploration Results reported are downhole weighted |
aggregation | averaging techniques, maximum and/or | means with duplicated sample values averaged. | ||
methods | minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high | | Table 2 summarises intercepts with a minimum grade of | |
grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material | 0.2g/t Au or 10g/t Ag or 0.1% Cu, with a maximum | |||
and should be stated. | internal dilution of 3 metres. Assay results outside these | |||
| Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short | reporting criteria are deemed to be too low to be of any | ||
lengths of high grade results and longer lengths | material significance and the exclusion of this | |||
of low grade results, the procedure used for such | information does not detract from the understanding of | |||
aggregation should be stated and some typical | the report. Internal high grade results are generally | |||
examples of such aggregations should be shown | stated at 2g/t Au, 100g/t Ag and 1% Cu lower cut-offs or | |||
in detail. | where individual high grade samples contribute >90% of | |||
| The assumptions used for any reporting of metal | the weighted average grade to any aggregated | ||
equivalent values should be clearly stated. | intersection reported. | |||
| No top cut is applied to Exploration Results. | |||
| No metal equivalent values are calculated. | |||
Relationship | | These relationships are particularly important in | | The geometry of individual veins and mineralisation |
between | the reporting of Exploration Results. | zones are highly variable due to mineralisation style. | ||
mineralisation widths and intercept | | If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. | | All mineralisation intercepts for Exploration Results are presented as down hole lengths. |
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
lengths | | If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known'). | ||
Diagrams | | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and | | Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the location of drill holes for |
tabulations of intercepts should be included for | this report. | |||
any significant discovery being reported These | ||||
should include, but not be limited to a plan view | ||||
of drill hole collar locations and appropriate | ||||
sectional views. | ||||
Balanced reporting | | Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, | | Exploration results report intercepts with a minimum grade of 0.2g/t Au or 10g/t Ag or 0.1% Cu, with a |
representative reporting of both low and high | maximum internal dilution of 3 metres. Assay results | |||
grades and/or widths should be practiced to | outside these reporting criteria are deemed to be too low | |||
avoid misleading reporting of Exploration | to be of any material significance and the exclusion of | |||
Results. | this information does not detract from the understanding | |||
of the report. | ||||
| Drill holes with results that do not meet these criteria are | |||
noted to avoid misinterpretation. | ||||
Other substantive exploration data | | Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk | | Multi-element analysis of diamond core is completed on all samples. Significant results for other metals analysed including Pb and Zn are reported where they are deemed an aid to interpretations. |
samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock | | Minimal weathering and oxidation is developed and of limited effect on grade distribution. | ||
characteristics; potential deleterious or | ||||
contaminating substances. | ||||
Further work | | The nature and scale of planned further work (eg | | Assessment of these Exploration Results will be in |
tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions | conjunction with further quantitative and qualitative | |||
or large-scale step-out drilling). | analytical work prior to targeting of future drilling within | |||
| Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of | the newly defined sulphide system. | ||
possible extensions, including the main | ||||
geological interpretations and future drilling | ||||
areas, provided this information is not | ||||
commercially sensitive. |
Drill Hole ID | Easting | Northing | RL | Dip | Azimuth (True) | Hole Length | Hole Type |
WCDD001 | 436960 | 6801404 | 581 | -60 | 89.7 | 104.5 | diamond |
WCDD002 | 437825 | 6801436 | 546 | -50 | 250.7 | 491.8 | diamond |
WCDD003 | 436843 | 6801097 | 556 | -80 | 263.2 | 803.8 | diamond |
Table 1: Location details of all drill holes in this report
Drill Hole ID | From | To | Interval (m) | Cu (%) | Au (g/t) | Ag (g/t) |
WCDD001 | No significant assay results | |||||
WCDD002 | 13 | 14 | 1 | 0.14 | 2.2 | |
17 | 18 | 1 | 0.58 | |||
96 | 97 | 1 | 0.58 | 0.01 | 3.7 | |
141 | 142 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 1.4 | |
166 | 167 | 1 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.8 | |
190 | 191 | 1 | 0.27 | 0.6 | ||
204 | 205 | 1 | 0.21 | 2.0 | ||
241 | 242 | 1 | 0.3 | 1.0 | ||
385 | 386 | 1 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 4.8 | |
390 | 391 | 1 | 0.44 | 0.09 | 3.7 | |
437 | 438 | 1 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.5 | |
456 | 457 | 1 | 0.29 | 5.7 | ||
WCDD003 | 162 | 163 | 1 | 0.11 | ||
518 | 519 | 1 | 0.22 | 0.8 | ||
537 | 538 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.8 | ||
Table 2: Assay results from drill holes WCDD001, WCDD002 and WCDD003 (Intercept cut-off grade of
0.1% Cu, 0.2g/t Au, 10 g/t Ag; maximum internal dilution of 3m).
distributed by |