ASX and Media Release: 30 June 2015 ASX Code: WRM Mt Carrington Exploration Extensive Sulphide Alteration Confirmed

White Rock Mineral's Mt Carrington gold-silver-copper project, 5km from Drake in northern New South Wales, now presents a compelling case for further detailed exploration as a result of the first pass drilling. This recent drilling has defined a large zone of sulphide alteration that extends the system over

2km west of previous known limits, and to a depth of at least 800 metres.

The initial three drill hole program on a previously unidentified anomaly has confirmed the validity of the deep penetrating IP technique (MIMDAS) with each drill hole intersecting extensive disseminated pyrite alteration of sufficient intensity and distribution to explain the chargeability response. The alteration and chargeability anomalies are open to the north, west and south, and open at depth, presenting significant potential for future mineralisation discovery. The success of the IP technique provides confidence in further defining the system with follow-up IP in conjunction with more detailed analytical studies on the drill core to help vector towards the source of mineralisation.

Anomalous copper, gold and pathfinder element results have confirmed that the large alteration zone encountered in drilling is an extension of the mineralising system that contains numerous copper, gold and silver workings in addition to the known Resources that form part of the Mt Carrington development project. Results for all three recently completed drill holes are presented in Table 2.

Chief Operating Officer ("COO") Matthew Gill commented: "The White Rock technical team is encouraged that such a large alteration system has been defined in addition to the known gold-silver Resources at Mt Carrington. The new extension presents a significant area of prospectivity with no previous drilling having been completed beyond the three recent drill holes. Such exploration potential now provides significant upside to any future development of the Mt Carrington project and reinforces our motivation to ensure that the value of the project is unlocked."

White Rock plans to evaluate the drill core using techniques developed in recent years that will assist with establishing the potential of the hydrothermal system and provide vectors to help target mineralisation. These techniques include sulphur isotopes, white mica crystallinity and chlorite chemistry, each of which will aid in further understanding whether a copper-gold porphyry system is driving the alteration. In addition, this information will also identify further epithermal gold targets at shallow levels that could augment the existing gold-silver resource development plans now the focus of feasibility studies.

White Rock is also in discussions to define complimentary Masters and PhD projects with leading Australian Universities that will assist in ensuring the latest techniques are executed in advancing the exploration of the whole mineralised system at Mt Carrington.

White Rock is pleased to acknowledge the NSW Government's co-funding drilling initiative program, from which the Company will be reimbursed approximately $140,000 of direct drilling costs.

For further information, please contact: Matthew Gill (Chief Operating Officer) Phone: 03 5331 4644

E-mail: info@whiterockminerals.com.au
Andrew Dart (Company Secretary) Phone: 03 5331 4644
Website: www.whiterockminerals.com.au

Figure 1: Plan location of recently completed drill holes (WCDD001, 002 and 003) with respect to copper soil anomalism and the chargeability anomalies located immediately west of the known Mt Carrington gold-silver deposits and copper prospects. Note the minimal historic drilling north, west and south of the main chargeability anomaly. Figure 2: Vertical projection of completed drill holes on MIMDAS IP chargeability cross sections - Line 1 (1400N) and Line 2 (1100N). High chargeable response in pink, low response in blue. *Competent Persons Report

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results or Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Mr Rohan Worland who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and is a consultant to White Rock Minerals Ltd. Mr Worland has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Worland consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

Geophysical information in this report is based on exploration data compiled by Mr Terry Hoschke who is employed as a Consultant to the Company through the geophysical consultancy Alterrex Pty Ltd. Mr Hoschke is a member of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists with sufficient experience of relevance to the styles of mineralisation and the types of deposits under consideration, and activities undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012

Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Hoschke consents to the inclusion in the report of matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.

About White Rock Minerals

White Rock is an Australian minerals exploration company focussed on the discovery and development of shallow
gold, silver and copper deposits in the New England Fold Belt, northern NSW. White Rock's cornerstone asset is the
100% owned Mt Carrington project located 5 km from the township of Drake in northern NSW, 4 hour's drive SW of
Brisbane and 2 hours west from Ballina. The Mt Carrington Project hosts shallow Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources totalling 338,000oz gold and 23.5Moz silver on granted Mining Leases with significant mining infrastructure in place. Exploration at Mt Carrington is in progress to generate and drill test a number of prospective near-mine copper and gold targets within a tenement area of 470km2 covering the under-explored Drake Volcanics.

Market Capitalisation: A$7m @ A$0.031/share

Issued Capital: 226m Ordinary shares, 7m Unlisted options (June 2015)

Balance Sheet: $0.6M, no debt (March 2015)

Shareholders

Avalon Ventures Corporation

36.80%

Board and Management

• Brian Phillips - Non-Executive Chairman

Greenstone Property Pty Ltd

10.30%

• Geoffrey Lowe - Non-Executive Director

Lion Capital Advisory Pty Ltd

5.02%

• Peter Lester - Non-Executive Director

Titeline Services Pty Ltd

2.76%

• Matthew Gill - Chief Operating Officer

Grand South Development Ltd

1.40%

• Andrew Dart - Company Secretary & CFO

TOP 20

68%

• Rohan Worland - Exploration Manager

Resources: The Mineral Resource inventory for Mt Carrington is contained in 8 separate gold and silver deposits (Figure

4) - Kylo, Strauss, Guy Bell, Red Rock, Lady Hampden, Silver King, White Rock and White Rock North deposits. The updated
Resource estimate for all deposits at the Mt Carrington Project totals 0.34Moz Au and 23.5Moz Ag.

MT CARRINGTON INDICATED & INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCE SUMMARY

Gold Dominant Resources

Resource Category

Tonnes

Au (g/t)

Gold Oz

Ag (g/t)

Silver Oz

Indicated

2,830,000

1.3

116,000

3.1

286,000

Inferred

3,810,000

1.3

158,000

2.9

353,000

Indicated & Inferred

6,640,000

1.3

275,000

3.0

639,000

Silver Dominant Resources

Resource Category

Tonnes

Au (g/t)

Gold Oz

Ag (g/t)

Silver Oz

Indicated

3,550,000

0.3

37,000

72

8,270,000

Inferred

8,950,000

0.1

27,000

51

14,533,000

Indicated & Inferred

12,500,000

0.2

64,000

57

22,803,000

Total Resources

Total

19,140,000

338,000

23,442,000

Mt Carrington Project - Mineral Resource Summary.

*Competent Persons Report (continued)

The gold and silver Resource figures for White Rock, Red Rock, Strauss, Kylo, Lady Hampden, Silver King and White Rock North have been taken from Resource estimates of February 2012, July 2013 and November 2013 prepared by Ravensgate Minerals Industry Consultants on behalf of White Rock Minerals Ltd and authored by Mr Don Maclean. Mr Maclean is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he has undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves." Mr Maclean consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears. This information was prepared and first disclosed under the JORC Code 2004 as per ASX releases by White Rock Minerals Ltd on 13 February 2012, 11 July 2013 and 20
November 2013. The Resources figures have not been updated since to comply with the JORC Code 2012 on the basis

that the information has not materially changed since it was last reported. The gold and silver Resource figures for Guy Bell have been taken from the Resource estimate of October 2008 prepared by Mining One Pty Ltd on behalf of Rex Minerals Ltd and authored by Dr Chris Gee who is a professional geologist with more than 10 years' experience in resource estimation. Dr Gee is a Competent Person as defined by the JORC Code. Mr Gee consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears. This information was prepared and first disclosed under the JORC Code 2004 as per the ASX release by Rex Minerals Ltd on 10 December
2008. The Resources figures have not been updated since to comply with the JORC Code 2012 on the basis that the information has not materially changed since it was last reported.

Figure 3: Mt Carrington Project Tenement and Resource Summary APPENDIX 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

Sampling techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole

All drilling is PQ, HQ or NQ diamond core from surface. Sampling is undertaken on selected 1m intervals unless defined otherwise by geological characteristics.

Core is split in half (or ¼ core for PQ) by automated core

gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments,

etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

saw to obtain a 3-4.5kg sample for external laboratory preparation and analysis. The oriented portion is retained for future reference.

Include reference to measures taken to ensure

sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems

used.

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse

Based on the grain size and distribution of mineralisation the sample size and mass is considered adequate for representative sampling.

Sampling accuracy and representativeness is ensured through comprehensive geotechnical and geological logging and oriented sampling along the apex of relevant mineralisation and veining.

circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m

samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to

produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other

cases more explanation may be required, such

as where there is coarse gold that has inherent

sampling problems. Unusual commodities or

mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules)

may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

Drilling techniques

Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).

All drilling is PQ, HQ or NQ diamond core from surface. Chrome barrels are used to maintain hole orientations. Triple tube is implemented as warranted by ground conditions.

All diamond core is oriented via an Islex Orifinder tool.

Drill sample

Method of recording and assessing core and

Drilling methods are selected to ensure maximum

recovery

chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

recovery possible. The maximum core length possible in

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery

competent ground is 3.1m.

and ensure representative nature of the

Drill run measurements and core loss are initially

samples.

recorded by the drilling contractor. Detailed geotechnical

Whether a relationship exists between sample

logging includes metre mark-ups and the measurement

recovery and grade and whether sample bias

of actual core length against run lengths recorded by the

may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain

drilling contractor. Any recorded core loss or recovery

of fine/coarse material.

measurements with >10% variance from expected

interval lengths is automatically flagged by data entry

procedures prior to validation by the supervising

geologist. Core recoveries for all drilled intervals are

typically greater than 95%.

All diamond core is oriented, which allows correct

positioning of core in the trays for accurate metre

measurements. Any orientation discrepancies are

documented and resolved with the supervising geologist

and drilling contractor.

A link between sample recovery and grade is not

apparent. No significant loss of fines or core has been

noted. Mineralisation is hosted in competent siliceous

ground with negligible oxide/supergene mineralisation

and limited soft ground.

Any contamination, potential contamination or areas of

poor recovery are noted and flagged in the database.

Logging

Whether core and chip samples have been

All diamond core undergoes geotechnical and geological

geologically and geotechnically logged to a level

logging to a level of detail (quantitative and qualitative)

of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource

sufficient to support use of the data in all categories of

estimation, mining studies and metallurgical

Mineral Resource estimation. Logging includes

studies.

stratigraphy, lithology, colour, weathering, grain size,

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in

volcanic type, clast type, clast size, roundness, textural

nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)

features, brecciation type, alteration type and intensity,

photography.

mineralogy, mineralisation, vein type, vein texture,

The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

proportion of vein components, sulphide and quartz

proportion per metre, structure, recovery, breaks per metre, rock quality designation, magnetic susceptibility

and specific gravity.

All core is photographed.

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

Sub-sampling techniques

and sample

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary

Diamond core is split in half (or ¼ core for PQ) by automated core saw to obtain a 3 - 4.5kg sample for external laboratory preparation by ALS Brisbane where it

preparation

split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.

is dried, crushed to 70% passing -6mm, riffle split to

For all sample types, the nature, quality and

~3kg then pulverised to 85% passing -75micron.

appropriateness of the sample preparation

The oriented half core portion is retained for future

technique.

reference.

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-

Quality control procedures include laboratory-prepared,

sampling stages to maximise representivity of

crushed duplicate samples of half core (1 in 50

samples.

samples). Variations outside of specifications are

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field

queried with the laboratory to determine the cause and

errors mitigated through re-assaying of retained samples as a first step.

duplicate/second-half sampling.

Sampling techniques and laboratory preparation

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

methods are considered to be industry standard and/or

best practice, are relevant to the material being sampled and are suitable for Mineral Resource estimation

purposes.

Quality of

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the

All diamond core samples were submitted to ALS

assay data

assaying and laboratory procedures used and

Brisbane for analysis. Au is assayed by technique Au-

and laboratory

whether the technique is considered partial or

AA25 (30g by fire assay and AAS with a 0.01ppm

tests

total.

detection limit). Multi-element suite of 33 elements

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld

including Ag is assayed by technique ME-ICP61 (0.25g

XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in

charge by four acid digest and ICP-AES finish with a

determining the analysis including instrument

0.5ppm Ag detection limit).

make and model, reading times, calibrations

Fire assay for Au by technique Au-AA25 is considered

factors applied and their derivation, etc.

total. Multi-element assay by technique ME-ICP61 is

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg

considered near-total for all but the most resistive

standards, blanks, duplicates, external

minerals (not of relevance).

laboratory checks) and whether acceptable

The nature and quality of the analytical technique is

levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision

deemed appropriate for the mineralisation style.

have been established.

Blanks, standards (relevant certified reference material)

and crushed core duplicate samples are inserted at

regular intervals (minimum 6 in 100 sample spacing).

Blanks are placed at the start of the batch and before

duplicate samples.

Additional blanks, standards and pulp duplicates are

analysed as part of laboratory QAQC and calibration

protocols

All QAQC results are reviewed on a batch by batch

basis.

Internal and external (geochemical consultant) reviews

of all QAQC results are undertaken periodically.

No external laboratory checks have been completed.

Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision have been

established for all assay data used in this report.

No handheld XRF values are reported.

Verification of

The verification of significant intersections by

All assay results are checked and verified by alternative

sampling and

either independent or alternative company

company personnel. Significant assay results prompt a

assaying

personnel.

visual review of relevant reference core for validation

The use of twinned holes.

purposes.

Documentation of primary data, data entry

No twinned holes have been completed in this report.

procedures, data verification, data storage

All data is logged digitally or via paper and subsequently

(physical and electronic) protocols.

entered digitally. Logging forms contain strict protocols

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

for regimented coding via locked spreadsheets.

All drilling logs are validated by the supervising

geologist.

Logging errors are held in quarantine until checked,

updated and validated.

All hard copy data is filed and stored. Digital data is filed

and stored on a server with routine local and remote

backups.

No adjustment to assay data is undertaken.

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

procedure(s) and classifications applied.

APPENDIX 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

Mineral

tenement and land tenure

Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures,

The Mt Carrington Project comprises 22 Mining Leases and 4 Exploration Licences.

All mining and exploration tenements are 100% owned

status

partnerships, overriding royalties, native title

and operated by White Rock (MTC) Pty Ltd, a 100%

interests, historical sites, wilderness or national

owned subsidiary of White Rock Minerals Limited.

park and environmental settings.

The exploration results reported here are on EL6273 and

The security of the tenure held at the time of

ML 1147.

reporting along with any known impediments to

obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

One active Native Title claim is registered over the area

(NNTT #NC11/5).

All of the mining and exploration tenements are granted.

No other known impediments to the tenement and

tenure situation exist.

Exploration

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by

The Mount Carrington project has seen significant

done by other

other parties.

exploration conducted by Carpentaria Exploration,

parties

Mount Carrington Mines, Newmont, Aberfoyle, CRA,

Drake Resources and predecessor company Rex

Minerals, as well as less significant work by a number of

other operators.

All historical work has been reviewed, appraised and

integrated into the current database where of sufficient

quality, relevance and applicability.

Geology

Deposit type, geological setting and style of

Porphyry copper-gold and low sulphidation epithermal

mineralisation.

gold-silver mineralisation.

Host rocks are rhyolitic to andesitic volcanics and

volcaniclastics of the Permian Drake Volcanics.

Mineralisation is typically hosted by sheeted to

stockwork style quartz veining, breccia fill and minor

massive silicified zones within phyllic to silicic alteration

zones.

Drill hole

A summary of all information material to the

See Table 1 for location details of all drill holes in this

Information

understanding of the exploration results

report.

including a tabulation of the following information

for all Material drill holes:

o easting and northing of the drill hole collar

o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation

above sea level in metres) of the drill hole

collar

o dip and azimuth of the hole

o down hole length and interception depth

o hole length.

If the exclusion of this information is justified on

the basis that the information is not Material and

this exclusion does not detract from the

understanding of the report, the Competent

Person should clearly explain why this is the

case.

Data

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting

All Exploration Results reported are downhole weighted

aggregation

averaging techniques, maximum and/or

means with duplicated sample values averaged.

methods

minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high

Table 2 summarises intercepts with a minimum grade of

grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material

0.2g/t Au or 10g/t Ag or 0.1% Cu, with a maximum

and should be stated.

internal dilution of 3 metres. Assay results outside these

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short

reporting criteria are deemed to be too low to be of any

lengths of high grade results and longer lengths

material significance and the exclusion of this

of low grade results, the procedure used for such

information does not detract from the understanding of

aggregation should be stated and some typical

the report. Internal high grade results are generally

examples of such aggregations should be shown

stated at 2g/t Au, 100g/t Ag and 1% Cu lower cut-offs or

in detail.

where individual high grade samples contribute >90% of

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal

the weighted average grade to any aggregated

equivalent values should be clearly stated.

intersection reported.

No top cut is applied to Exploration Results.

No metal equivalent values are calculated.

Relationship

These relationships are particularly important in

The geometry of individual veins and mineralisation

between

the reporting of Exploration Results.

zones are highly variable due to mineralisation style.

mineralisation

widths and intercept

If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.

All mineralisation intercepts for Exploration Results are presented as down hole lengths.

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

lengths

If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known').

Diagrams

Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and

Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the location of drill holes for

tabulations of intercepts should be included for

this report.

any significant discovery being reported These

should include, but not be limited to a plan view

of drill hole collar locations and appropriate

sectional views.

Balanced reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all

Exploration Results is not practicable,

Exploration results report intercepts with a minimum grade of 0.2g/t Au or 10g/t Ag or 0.1% Cu, with a

representative reporting of both low and high

maximum internal dilution of 3 metres. Assay results

grades and/or widths should be practiced to

outside these reporting criteria are deemed to be too low

avoid misleading reporting of Exploration

to be of any material significance and the exclusion of

Results.

this information does not detract from the understanding

of the report.

Drill holes with results that do not meet these criteria are

noted to avoid misinterpretation.

Other

substantive exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk

Multi-element analysis of diamond core is completed on all samples. Significant results for other metals analysed including Pb and Zn are reported where they are deemed an aid to interpretations.

samples - size and method of treatment;

metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock

Minimal weathering and oxidation is developed and of limited effect on grade distribution.

characteristics; potential deleterious or

contaminating substances.

Further work

The nature and scale of planned further work (eg

Assessment of these Exploration Results will be in

tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions

conjunction with further quantitative and qualitative

or large-scale step-out drilling).

analytical work prior to targeting of future drilling within

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of

the newly defined sulphide system.

possible extensions, including the main

geological interpretations and future drilling

areas, provided this information is not

commercially sensitive.

Drill Hole ID

Easting

Northing

RL

Dip

Azimuth

(True)

Hole

Length

Hole Type

WCDD001

436960

6801404

581

-60

89.7

104.5

diamond

WCDD002

437825

6801436

546

-50

250.7

491.8

diamond

WCDD003

436843

6801097

556

-80

263.2

803.8

diamond

Table 1: Location details of all drill holes in this report

Drill Hole

ID

From

To

Interval

(m)

Cu (%)

Au (g/t)

Ag (g/t)

WCDD001

No significant assay results

WCDD002

13

14

1

0.14

2.2

17

18

1

0.58

96

97

1

0.58

0.01

3.7

141

142

1

0.12

0.01

1.4

166

167

1

0.02

0.36

0.8

190

191

1

0.27

0.6

204

205

1

0.21

2.0

241

242

1

0.3

1.0

385

386

1

0.27

0.02

4.8

390

391

1

0.44

0.09

3.7

437

438

1

0.11

0.01

0.5

456

457

1

0.29

5.7

WCDD003

162

163

1

0.11

518

519

1

0.22

0.8

537

538

1

0.12

0.8

Table 2: Assay results from drill holes WCDD001, WCDD002 and WCDD003 (Intercept cut-off grade of

0.1% Cu, 0.2g/t Au, 10 g/t Ag; maximum internal dilution of 3m).

distributed by