Ministry of Finance : Extracts from the intervention of Union Finance Minister Shri P. Chidambaram at the meeting of the full planning commission
09/18/2012| 04:12am US/Eastern

Recommend:
1
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA PRESS INFORMATION BUREAU
NEW DELHI
*******
EXTRACTS FROM THE INTERVENTION OF UNION FINANCE MINISTER SHRI
P. CHIDAMBARAM AT THE MEETING OF THE FULL PLANNING COMMISSION
TODAY
15th September,2012
"I welcome the growth rate target of 8.2% envisaged for the
12th Plan. The present target is a realistic
assumption given that in the 10th Plan we
achieved a GDP growth rate of 7.6% and in the
11th Plan the achievement has been 7.9%."
……..
"The gross budgetary support during the entire
12th Plan period has been estimated at Rs.35.68
lakh crores which works out to 5.23% of GDP over the 5 year
period. The GBS realized over the 11th Plan
period was only 4.69% of GDP. The assumptions of tax to GDP
ratio seem to be highly optimistic. The Internal and Extra
Budgetary Resources (IEBR) of the CPSUs has been estimated at
Rs.20.59 lakh crores making the total resources available for
the Central Plan at Rs.47.70 lakh crores. Higher IEBR would
be required to meet the shortfall, if any, in the GBS."
……….
"On the Non-Plan expenditure side, the major subsidies are
projected to decline from 1.9% of GDP as per the Budget
Estimates for 2012-13 to 1.2% in
2016-17. The estimated major subsidies in 2012-13 would be
around 2.4% of
GDP, and a sharp fall as assumed in the Plan may be
over-optimistic. Direct cash transfer of subsidies in food,
fertilizers and petroleum will help in this reduction. I
would urge that by the end of the 12th Plan,
these three major subsidies be rolled out across the country
through direct cash transfers to the beneficiaries. Pilot
projects are already under implementation for LPG and
kerosene and it is our intention to extend the direct
transfer mechanism to the UTs in the first phase."
………
"Analysis shows that out of the 147 Centrally Sponsored
Schemes currently in operation, 100 schemes are with an
outlay of less than Rs.300 crores each for the whole country.
Given the cost of administering the schemes and the
capacity
2
now available within the States, these deserve to be closed
at the level of the Central Government. The allocated funds
of Rs.7229 crores in the 2011-12 Budget could be added to the
annual Normal Central Assistance of the respective States to
enable them to implement these schemes."
………..
"We must keep in mind that outcomes must be measured not only
in terms of achieving the financial outlays but also
achieving the physical targets. The main reason why actual
growth rate in each Plan period was less than the targeted
growth rate was the failure to achieve physical targets. Let
me illustrate by taking
the targets set and the targets achieved in the
11th Plan period.
|
Sector
|
XIth Plan
|
|
|
Target
|
Achievement
|
|
Roads
|
48,479 kms.
|
Completed - 17,571 kms. Under implementation -
13,981 kms.
To be awarded -
16,927 kms.
|
|
Additional power generation capacity
created
|
78,700 MW
|
55,000 MW
|
|
Coal production (per annum)
|
680 million tonnes reduced to 630 million
tonnes.
|
540 million tonnes
|
|
Crude oil production (per annum)
|
206.73 million tonnes
|
177.09 million tonnes
|
|
Gas production (per annum)
|
255.76 billion cubic metres
|
212.5 billion cubic metres
|
|
Railways capacity creation
|
21,500 kms reduced to
15,000 kms
|
14,752 kms
|
I would, therefore, urge that we seriously consider the need
to set up a mechanism at the Cabinet level to take final
decisions on major investment proposals, especially in the
infrastructure sector and, in particular, in the sectors that
I have mentioned above. At present, the Allocation of
Business Rules allocates the authority to take the final
decision/decisions to one or more ministries. In fact, this
is the reason why a truly "final" decision does not emerge
for many years. I would, therefore, urge that the authority
to take the final decision/decisions should be vested in a
National Investment Board to be chaired by the Prime Minister
and the Allocation of Business Rules should be amended to
create such a mechanism. The National Investment Board's
authority should extend to proposals/projects
3
where the investment is above a certain threshold, say,
Rs.1,000 crore. Once the final decision is taken by the
National Investment Board, no other Ministry or Department or
Authority should be able to interfere with that decision or
delay its
implementation."
******
distributed by
|
|
Recommend :