FISKER INC. |
Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
| 0.063 USD | +6.24% |
|
+3.28% | -96.40% |
| May. 14 | EV startup Canoo posts larger-than-expected loss in first quarter | RE |
| May. 14 | News Highlights : Top Company News of the Day - Tuesday at 7 AM ET | DJ |
Summary
- Overall, the company has poor fundamentals for a medium to long-term investment strategy.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
Strengths
- Analysts expect a sharply increasing business volume for the group, with high growth rates in the coming years.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been strongly revised upwards over the last four months.
Weaknesses
- As a percentage of sales and without taking into account depreciation and amortization, the company has relatively low margins.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- The sales outlook for the group was lowered in the last twelve months. This change in forecast points out a decline in activity as well as pessimistic analyses of the company.
- For the past year, analysts have significantly revised downwards their profit estimates.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- Most analysts agree on a negative opinion with regard to the stock. Indeed, the average consensus issues recommendations to underperform or sell.
- The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Auto & Truck Manufacturers
| 1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -96.40% | 95.62M | C | ||
| -45.55% | 21.62B | C- | ||
| -41.22% | 11.5B | - | ||
| -55.58% | 10.37B | D | ||
| -45.98% | 10.14B | D+ | ||
| -42.15% | 7.96B | B | ||
| 0.00% | 7.58B | - | - | |
| -35.04% | 6.31B | D+ | ||
| 0.00% | 6.1B | - | - | |
| -18.77% | 4.99B | - |
Investor Rating
Trading Rating
ESG Refinitiv
Financials
Sales growth
Earnings Growth
-
EBITDA / Sales
Profitability
Finances
-
Valuation
P/E ratio
-
EV / Sales
-
Price to Book
-
Price to Free Cash Flow
-
Yield
-
Momentum
1 year Revenue revision
4 months Revenue revision
7 days Revenue revision
1 year EPS revision
4 months EPS revision
Consensus
Analyst Opinion
Potential Price Target
4m Target Price Revision
4m Revision of opinion
12m Revision of opinion
Business Predictability
Analyst Coverage
Divergence of Estimates
Divergence of analysts' opinions
Divergence of Target Price
Earnings quality
Environment
Emissions
Innovation
Use of resources
Governance
CSR Strategy
Management
Shareholders
Controversy
Controversy
Technical analysis
ST Timing
MT Timing
LT Timing
RSI
Bollinger Spread
Unusual volumes
- Stock Market
- Equities
- SPAQ Stock
- Ratings Fisker Inc.
