Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
71.66 AUD | +0.21% | -4.83% | +2.37% |
May. 22 | BHP-Anglo prospects flag more M&A ahead for miners | RE |
May. 21 | Mineral Resources' Onslow Iron Project Delivers First Ore on Ship to China Baowu Steel Group Ahead of Schedule | MT |
Summary
- Overall, the company has poor fundamentals for a medium to long-term investment strategy.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
Strengths
- The company's profit outlook over the next few years is a strong asset.
- The company's EBITDA/Sales ratio is relatively high and results in high margins before depreciation, amortization and taxes.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been strongly revised upwards over the last four months.
Weaknesses
- The company is in debt and has limited leeway for investment
- The company's valuation in terms of earnings multiples is rather high. Indeed, the firm is getting paid 32.21 times its estimated earnings per share for the ongoing year.
- The company's enterprise value to sales, at 3.97 times its current sales, is high.
- In relation to the value of its tangible assets, the company's valuation appears relatively high.
- The firm pays small or no dividend to shareholders. For that reason, it is not a yield company.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last four months, EPS estimates made by Standard & Poor's analysts have been revised downwards.
- The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
- The group usually releases earnings worse than estimated.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Diversified Mining
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
+2.37% | 9.28B | B | ||
-11.70% | 150B | C+ | ||
-6.26% | 119B | C | ||
+1.83% | 74.34B | C+ | ||
+11.36% | 48.2B | B | ||
-4.84% | 45.45B | B+ | ||
+27.55% | 38.79B | C+ | ||
+116.04% | 34.78B | A- | ||
+26.57% | 26.97B | B- | ||
+74.05% | 20.02B | C+ |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- MIN Stock
- Ratings Mineral Resources Limited