Log in
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Dynamic quotes 

4-Traders Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nyse  >  Dominion Energy Inc    D

Mes dernières consult.
Most popular
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsSector newsTweets
The feature you requested does not exist. However, we suggest the following feature:

Principi: Alternatives for removal of coal ash are feasible

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
12/14/2017 | 07:38pm CET

Just in time for the holidays, the people of Prince William County received a gift from the Virginia General Assembly, in the form of an 800-page report analyzing the options for Dominion Energy's disposal of the hazardous coal ash stored in ponds at the Possum Point facility in Dumfries. The findings validate the environmental concerns surrounding the controversial cap-in-place method proposed by Dominion, and demonstrate that there are feasible alternatives with less environmental impact, including one that could generate economic growth. This report marked the latest step in a multi-year odyssey of community members, local and state officials and nonprofits working together to ensure that the coal ash dewatering and removal process is done in the most effective, environmentally sensitive and safe manner possible. To me, cost should not be the primary consideration in disposing of the coal ash. Rather, it should be protecting the residents who live on and around Possum Point Road, followed by ensuring that Dominion's removal of the coal ash – a highly toxic, cancer-causing byproduct of burning coal for fuel – occurs in the least intrusive manner while simultaneously protecting the environment, to include keeping pollutants out of Quantico Creek, the Potomac River and Chesapeake Bay.While there hasn't been time to fully digest the entirety of the report, there were several immediate takeaways that provide clarity and direction moving forward: First, we've learned that contaminants are leaking into the ground around the coal ash ponds. While Dominion contends that the contaminants haven't breached the ground wells of surrounding homes, these findings prove that cap-in-place is no longer a viable option. We cannot risk the possibility of contaminants further leaching into the ground and poisoning water sources. Second, the analyzed "alternative options" can be fully achieved within the 15-year window that the Environmental Protection Agency has set for coal ash pond closures. These findings dilute arguments that the alternative closure options are all unfeasible or impractical. In fact, the report makes the alternatives more attractive.Third, several promising alternatives are financially viable. This stands in direct contradiction to Dominion's assertion that alternatives to cap-in-place-such as moving coal ash to a fully lined landfill, removing and transporting it off-site or selling the ash to be repurposed in products such as bricks-are either unfeasible or cost-prohibitive. This report definitively proves that this simply isn't the case.Dominion estimates that its proposed cap-in-place option will take three to five years to complete and cost up to $418 million. Comparatively, relocating the coal ash to a lined landfill, which would dramatically reduce the possibility of leaching, would cost $380 million and take eight years.The prospect of environmental contamination makes both of these options unsatisfactory, in my opinion. Comparatively, the joint concept of removal, which on its own is the most expensive alternative, combined with reuse (fly ash, a coal ash byproduct, can be used to strengthen concrete and bricks) would take eight to 17 years and cost approximately $899 million. However, the cost could be offset by the construction of a new production facility that would bring with it the creation of dozens of new, high-paying jobs. Dominion is likely to make a profit from reuse. We are now equipped with a clearer picture of what can and should be done to protect people living near Possum Point, along with the surrounding land and waterways. I look forward to a continued dialogue with area residents, my colleagues on the Board of County Supervisors, the Prince William delegation in Richmond and Dominion officials to find an environmentally sound solution for closing the coal ash ponds in Prince William County.

Supervisor Frank Principi,

Woodbridge District

© Prince William Today © Copyright 2017, Sun Gazette Newspapers, Springfield, VA., source Newspapers

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
12/14 PRINCIPI : Alternatives for removal of coal ash are feasible
12/14 DOMINION ENERGY : Solar farm’s daily production provides enough electricit..
12/14 DOMINION ENERGY : North Anna reactor goes back online North Anna reactor is back..
12/14 READY FOR 100 : The push towards 100 percent clean energy in Alexandria.
12/14 DOMINION ENERGY : Pipeline gets approval from Park Service Pipeline gets approva..
12/14 DOMINION ENERGY : Trees vs. Power Lines
12/13 DOMINION ENERGY : State board approves water certification for Dominion's pipeli..
12/13 DOMINION : Power restored in York County
12/13 DOMINION ENERGY : Pipeline wins approval, but board delays certification State b..
12/12 DOMINION : Crash knocks out power to hundreds in York County
More news
News from SeekingAlpha
12/13 Sand In My Shoes - Southern Fried Utilities
12/12 Virginia board OKs Atlantic Coast Pipeline water permit but with delay
12/12 How To Profit On The Cove Point LNG Export Terminal
12/11 VALUATION DASHBOARD : Utilities - Update
12/08 Scana rises on takeover rumors, with NextEra a potential suitor
Financials ($)
Sales 2017 12 944 M
EBIT 2017 4 517 M
Net income 2017 2 285 M
Debt 2017 36 008 M
Yield 2017 3,61%
P/E ratio 2017 23,48
P/E ratio 2018 21,00
EV / Sales 2017 6,98x
EV / Sales 2018 6,35x
Capitalization 54 301 M
Duration : Period :
Dominion Energy Inc Technical Analysis Chart | D | US25746U1097 | 4-Traders
Technical analysis trends DOMINION ENERGY INC
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
Income Statement Evolution
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 18
Average target price 82,4 $
Spread / Average Target -2,3%
EPS Revisions
Thomas F. Farrell Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
Scot C. Hathaway Senior VP-Operations, Engineering & Construction
Mark F. McGettrick Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President
P. Rodney Blevins Chief Information Officer & Senior Vice President
John W. Harris Independent Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
DUKE ENERGY CORP12.81%61 288
SOUTHERN CO5.06%51 707
IBERDROLA4.56%48 526