Log in
E-mail
Password
Remember
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Settings
Settings
Dynamic quotes 
OFFON

4-Traders Homepage  >  Equities  >  London Stock Exchange  >  Glencore    GLEN   JE00B4T3BW64

GLENCORE (GLEN)
Mes dernières consult.
Most popular
SummaryQuotesChartsNewsAnalysisCalendarCompanyFinancialsConsensusRevisions 
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsSector newsTweets

Glencore : mine's 'deal' with Indigenous owners called into question, documents reveal

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
06/16/2017 | 06:45am CEST

A purported deal struck between the mining company Glencore and Aboriginal traditional owners has been called into question, accidentally published government documents reveal.

The deal, which seeks to almost double the height of a waste rock pile to 140 metres, forms a significant part of Glencore’s proposal to extend its lead and zinc operations in McArthur river in the north-east of the Northern Territory.

Until now the height has been restricted by a sacred sites agreement stipulating the pile go no higher than 80 metres – the height of nearby Mount Stubbs, a Barramundi Dreaming site for local clans.

Related: Adani mine loses majority support of traditional owner representatives

While McArthur river mine (MRM) has previously told the Guardian it reached an agreement with traditional custodians to go higher, internal government briefings accidentally published last week have cast doubt on whether their efforts were sufficient.

Late on Friday afternoon, amid a crossbench revolt over the cutting back of NT budget estimates hours, the government released a number of early responses to estimates queries.

The media release from the office of the attorney general said the move represented an “unprecedented level of transparency” from an “open and transparent Labor government”.

But internal briefing papers were accidentally attached to some documents.

According to one briefing, the Aboriginal Areas Protection Authority – which issues the legally binding sacred site certificates – has sought legal advice about MRM’s agreement with custodians and is engaged in discussions with the company “in relation to the agreement, to ensure its validity”.

Under the Northern Territory Aboriginal Sacred Sites Act, if a company seeks to vary a certificate, Aapa will consult with custodians and investigate whether they agree to it.

A subsection to the legislation allows for Aapa to simply issue certificates if it is satisfied that “an agreement has been reached between custodians and the applicants”.

The briefing notes suggest MRM originally relied on the subsection but after its consultation process was questioned by Aapa it responded that the statutory body should make its own inquiries.

According to the briefing, Aapa wrote to McArthur river mine seeking further information about the agreement it said it had reached, specifically asking what information was given to custodians about the impact of increasing the waste rock pile. It also requested minutes and recordings of any meetings held.

MRM responded that – in its view – Aapa had to consult with custodians “to determine whether an agreement has been reached or not”.

The revelations raise questions about the nature of consultations with traditional owners, and whether the consent MRM said it had is sufficient to satisfy Aapa. The agreement has reportedly caused rifts among custodians and their families – not all of whom have any say in the process.

In a statement to Guardian Australia, MRM defended its consultation, which it said had been conducted with custodians in “an open and transparent manner”.

It declined to provide details of the agreement, citing confidentiality requests by custodians, but said Aapa now had all the details and was conducting its own assessment before deciding on approval of the varied certificate.

Related: Mabo 25 years on: let's look at the vast, absurdist fiction this ruling toppled | Paul Daley

In an environmental impact statement released this year, MRM said it had “received written consent from custodians to build the [waste rock pile] to the height of 140m, and they have maintained the ‘no access’ restriction to the sacred site by any MRM personnel as a condition of their consent”.

A spokesman for the NT environment minister, Lauren Moss, said she was aware Aapa was undertaking statutory duties under sacred sites legislation and the agreement was a matter for that organisation.

Last month the Guardian reported on the divide in the community over MRM’s proposed 20-year extension to the mine, and the subsequent rehabilitation plan which would potentially blow out to 300 years.

In 2013 the waste rock pile combusted and the fire sent toxic smoke over the community for more than a year. The blaze – in conjunction with other controversies including contamination incidents – prompted the Environmental Protection Agency to demand a new impact statement if MRM wanted to expand.

Community submissions were finalised in May before the NT and federal governments make their assessments under the NT’s Environmental Assessment Act and the commonwealth’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.

Copyright © 2017 theguardian.com. All rights reserved., source Guardian Online

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
0
Latest news on GLENCORE
09/24 GLENCORE : Egypt buys 60,000 T soyoil and 31,000 T sunflower oil in tender
09/22 Exclusive - Volkswagen moves to secure cobalt supplies in shift to electric c..
09/21 Hedge funds bet on bright future for metals
09/21 GLENCORE : strikes a multi-year purchase deal with Angola LNG
09/20 GLENCORE : Angola LNG and Glencore sign LNG sales agreement
09/15 Surging sterling sends FTSE to fresh four-month low
09/14 FTSE hits bump on sterling jump after Bank of England rate hike signal
09/14 Oil, retailers help European shares touch five-week high
09/14 CALLINEX MINES : Intersects 18.7 Meters of 5.8% Zn Eq. at the Nash Creek Zinc Pr..
09/13 Sterling's slip from one-year high curbs FTSE losses
More news
News from SeekingAlpha
07:17a Cobalt Miners News For The Month Of September 2017
09/24 THE NEST EGG PORTFOLIO : What About Glencore's Tax-Free Dividends?
09/22 Iron ore plunges as China's environmental curbs cause "serious impact"
09/20 Iron ore prices slide amid Chinese demand doubts, peak steel warning
09/18 Glencore's Most Excellent Journey
Financials ($)
Sales 2017 202 B
EBIT 2017 7 662 M
Net income 2017 4 918 M
Debt 2017 20 533 M
Yield 2017 2,42%
P/E ratio 2017 14,15
P/E ratio 2018 14,75
EV / Sales 2017 0,44x
EV / Sales 2018 0,42x
Capitalization 67 417 M
Chart GLENCORE
Duration : Period :
Glencore Technical Analysis Chart | GLEN | JE00B4T3BW64 | 4-Traders
Technical analysis trends GLENCORE
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
TrendsNeutralBullishBullish
Income Statement Evolution
Consensus
Sell
Buy
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 25
Average target price 4,89 $
Spread / Average Target 4,5%
EPS Revisions
Managers
NameTitle
Ivan Glasenberg Chief Executive Officer & Executive Director
Anthony Bryan Hayward Independent Non-Executive Chairman
Steven F. Kalmin Chief Financial Officer
Peter Roland Coates Non-Executive Director
Leonhard Heinrich Fischer Independent Non-Executive Director
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
GLENCORE25.17%67 851
CHINA SHENHUA ENERGY COMPANY LIMITED27.44%59 828
COAL INDIA LTD-15.54%24 317
SHAANXI COAL INDUSTRY CO LTD77.32%13 051
CHINA COAL ENERGY COMPANY LIMITED8.43%10 769
YANZHOU COAL MINING CO LTD18.05%7 721