Urban&Civic : Half Yearly Report

27 May 2015

Urban&Civic plc

('Urban&Civic', the 'Company' or the 'Group')

RESULTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS TO 31 MARCH 2015

EARLY CYCLE ACHIEVEMENTS

Urban&Civic plc (LSE: UANC) announces its unaudited results for the six months to 31 March 2015, which effectively represents the second half of the Group's first year of trading as a listed company.

Highlights:

In commenting on the results, Nigel Hugill, Executive Chairman described himself as 'fully content' with progress since Listing

'We have been able to create a powerful delivery machine with a strong regional project base, just as we envisaged on coming to market last May. EPRA net asset value per share shows a 12 per cent increase over the ten months since Listing, which affords good confidence for forthcoming performance. Strategic site delivery has now started in earnest with programmed infrastructure at Alconbury well underway and Hopkins Homes selected as our first residential partner. Catesby is demonstrably proving its worth only three months since acquisition. Altogether, this is early cycle for us: having assembled core holdings in high employment areas where improving real incomes, supported by Help to Buy, saw the Conservatives recently register some of their strongest gains.'

For further information, please contact:

Chairman's statement

Introduction

I can report considerable further advancement in the six months to 31 March 2015, concluding what is effectively our first year of trading as a listed company. EPRA net assets per share moved approaching 4 per cent higher over the six months, reflecting only modest appraised upward movement in our strategic assets and high cash holdings in the course of rapid deployment. The acquisition of Catesby brings another major ‎housing site into the portfolio, as well as strengthening near term operating revenues. We are continuing to source consumer facing investments, capable of being sustained by real income growth in the UK regions. Strategic site delivery has now started in earnest with programmed infrastructure at Alconbury well underway and Hopkins Homes (www.hopkinshomes.co.uk) selected as our first residential partner.‎

We have been able to create a powerful delivery machine with a strong regional project base, just as we envisaged on coming to market. The extent of progress has been recognised by industry peers in various awards and in prospective new project selections. The reported March 2015 EPRA net asset value of £371.1 million or 259p per share compares with the adjusted pro forma on Listing in May 2014 of £323.8 million, or 231p per share. This 12 per cent increase over the ten months since Listing and during what for us is likely to be early in the cycle, affords confidence for forthcoming performance. ‎ The thriving land promotion activities of Catesby will remain functionally separate but the integration of Terrace Hill operations is now fully complete. The pace of cash investment further highlights the prevailing level of Group activity. In addition to drawing down £54.6 million of cash balances over the six months, we committed a further £50.6 million to investment in our strategic projects, new asset purchases and developments under construction. The total actual amount of investment during the period therefore amounted to more than £105 million.

The locations of Urban&Civic's residential interests, including those acquired via Catesby, are in parts of the UK where real earnings are growing most strongly and often where the Conservatives registered large voting gains in the recent Election. The underlying level of demand for family housing up to and around £250,000 in high employment areas, boosted by the success of the Help to Buyinitiative and the more recent realignment of stamp duty, ought to sustain both absorption levels and pricing.

Accordingly and in line with revised expectations, the Board has approved the payment of an interim dividend of 1.0p per share, payable on 26 June 2015 to shareholders on the register on 5 June 2015. Together with the maiden dividend of 1.5p per share paid in February 2015, this amounts to a payment to shareholders of 2.5p for a short first full year as a Listed company and an acceleration of 12 months relative to original indications given in the May 2014 Listing Particulars.

Commentary

The recent election outcome may increase the level of Departmental consideration and intervention on housing referrals and development generally. The high success rates in favour of applicants at appeal could well drop. The trend is already down for the past six months and may fall further. Moreover, the Conservatives also made strong municipal and district council gains that went largely unremarked in the post parliamentary inquisition into how the pollsters were proved so wrong. Following the move out of Coalition and strengthened shire representation, the reasonable expectation is for higher regard to local sensitivities, albeit tempered by a real priority to achieve increased housing numbers in the current Parliament.

It is not the case historically that the aggregate number of consented houses is lower under Conservative Governments; although it is true that there is a tendency for the homes to be delivered via a smaller number of larger applications. If anything, therefore, we can expect further pressure towards the implementation of larger sites. By way of central encouragement, we may also see extensions to large site funding, such as the £11.2 million advance from the Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) to finance link road construction to the Catesby consented urban extension at Newark in Nottinghamshire. The facility is repayable only out of realised plot sales proceeds.

Meanwhile, the Help to Buyequity loan assistance, which currently underpins approximately 5 per cent of new UK mortgages and is only available on new build properties, can be expected to remain strongly supportive in our target markets. Official figures suggest that the value of equity loans advanced since the scheme introduction in 2013 totalled £2.0 billion through to March 2015 on £10.0 billion of related housing purchases. The average house purchase price was reported as around £215,000, with a mean equity loan of approaching £43,000 - very close to the maximum assistance level of 20 per cent. Whilst not restricted to first time buyers, that category accounts for above 80 per cent of all Help to Buypurchases. Largely driven by the extent of demand for the scheme, the number of first time buyers climbed above 300,000 in 2014, a figure not previously reached since 2007.

Figures on first home ownership are strongly correlated with employment levels and perceived job security. Whilst implied loan-to-income ratios mean that a recovery to past levels appears unlikely (between 1985 and 2000 first time housing purchases averaged approximately 500,000 per year), the absolute levels of employment and population growth, combined with relative loan servicing affordability on housing outside of London suggest that first time buyer activity will continue to grow, particularly in high employment areas. Huntingdonshire (Alconbury) - south Warwickshire (Rugby) and the southern part of the East Midlands (Newark), all register claimant count percentages below the national average. The trio are also characterised by well balanced private sector employment.

Forecasted 2015 UK GDP is expected to grow between 2.5 and 3 per cent but the impact on disposable income is likely to be higher. Assuming mortgage interest rates remain at current levels (if anything, competitive short term pressures appear downward), in combination with the impact of lower petrol and energy costs and reviving private sector wage increases, the growth in real net disposable income for existing and would-be home owners will underpin housing demand.

As an offset, it may be that the major quoted housebuilders' determination to recover margin has near term impact on output and, thereby, demand for land acquisition. The country went into recession with the most concentrated housebuilder configuration in the world and emerged with a still greater concentration. In 2014 for the first time ever, the seven largest housebuilders accounted for more than half national housing output. Notwithstanding, the extent of competitive bidding on two consented sites marketed by Catesby since acquisition (Balsall Common, near to Solihull and Haywards Heath in West Sussex) demonstrates the continued requirement in good areas with short commissioning periods. Equally, we expect to have housebuilders on site and primary schools being constructed across all three of our consented urban extensions by early Summer 2016. Serviced plot purchases are highly capital efficient to incoming housebuilders, which carries the corollary advantage of broadening the range of prospective participants, thereby encouraging smaller but well established and highly regarded companies such as Hopkins Homes to build on our developments.

Catesby

Catesby is patently proving its worth only three months since acquisition. The February 2015 RNS announcement included the expectation that the £34 million acquisition would be ‎materially earnings and asset enhancing in the current year. To that end, the £4.7 million credit to the income statement in these March 2015 half year results reflects a discount on purchase based upon an acquisition value of £19.3 million for Newark, with all other interests (other than Haywards Heath) being fair valued at cost. Haywards Heath received outline consent in January 2015 with sales completion anticipated in September 2015. Catesby's participation in the site was fair valued on acquisition, with an additional £1 million EPRA uplift included at 31 March 2015 to reflect the positive evidence from subsequent marketing. Our policy will be to include an EPRA adjustment on land owned or under option only where resolutions to grant or outline consents were secured prior to the accounting date but proceeds have not yet been received. Accordingly, an EPRA uplift of £2.7 million has been taken on Catesby's ownerships at Balsall Common, for which resolution to grant was obtained in March of this year, with sales completion scheduled for the end of June.

The business was founded 19 years ago with an absolute emphasis on technical analysis and working with planning officers. Closer involvement has only served to reinforce our positive estimation. The team are disciplined, highly focussed and well set up to take advantage of prevailing presumptions within a planning system that will continue to place considerable reliance on the ability of Local Authorities to show 5 and 15 year sustainable housing supply. The maintaining number of planning officer recommendations to approve is testament to their approach. The conversion rate on applications has been consistently high, reflected in annual pre-tax profits of £6.2 million and £7.0 million in the twelve months to December 2013 and 2014 respectively.

Fair valuing on acquisition and moving to a September year end militates against actual 2015 comparisons. Nevertheless, the underlying pre-tax profits for the twelve months to December 2015 look set to at least match those of last year with a future pipeline that appears robust. The integration of financial ‎reporting and management systems is progressing well and the pooled information systems are already proving invaluable across the Group.

The acquired holdings in Newark comprise an 82 per cent interest in 2,600 new homes, with associated commercial development land. Netting off the value of the latter, the acquisition cost of the housing equates to £8,300 per unserviced plot. The intention is that Newark will be developed in accordance with the Urban&Civic business model of realising value from serviced plot parcels, having invested in physical infrastructure and high quality public realm. The nature of the area (which increasingly houses workers from Nottingham and is on the periphery of a daily commute to London) is that sales drop markedly in periods of weak demand but recover quickly and on a stepped basis. Local new house sales are around £175-180 per sq. ft., so land values are exceedingly leveraged into relatively modest price increases and associated absorption rates.

We have said consistently that our policy is not to bank borrow against land or infrastructure on strategic sites. However, if the bidding on Balsall Common and Haywards Heath is evidence of the prevailing desire for marketable sites, the approach to Newark demonstrates the resolve of Central Government on a more strategic scale. Within four weeks of the acquisition of Catesby, the Group had drawn down on the £11.2 million HCA facility, which almost fully funds the construction cost for the first phase of a southern link road that accesses the site and will ultimately join the A1 to the A46. As well as only being repayable out of realised sales proceeds, the loan is non-recourse, limited default, interest accrued and at a European Community referenced rate. There are now good prospects of an additional £9.5 million of grant funding of which £2.5 million is already confirmed by the district council.

The headline consideration for Catesby comprised £22 million in cash and £12 million of consideration and employee shares. Depending on the outcome of outstanding planning applications (one of which is already approved and awaiting only statutory confirmations), there is now a good probability that the cash portion of the consideration will be fully repaid before the end of 2015 calendar year.

Strategic sites

The agreement with Hopkins Homes at Alconbury represents an important milestone in the large site monetisation, which is key to maintaining operating momentum and net asset growth for the Group. Hopkins is a highly reputed, privately owned, medium sized builder operating principally in Cambridgeshire, Norfolk and Suffolk which is committed to helping us establish price and quality thresholds from the outset. They were one of four potential delivery partners that we approached, all of which made firm proposals. The basis of the arrangements (which cover the first 128 units in Key Phase 1 but are not exclusive) is for a minimum serviced value per plot and, thereafter, for a joint share of realised profits. Phase 1 residential infrastructure works are now on site and construction of the new Church of England operated primary school will commence in July, along with a new Amenity building to include a gym, bar, restaurant and community accommodation for both incoming residents and Enterprise Zone tenants. Meanwhile detailed housing designs are the subject of pre application discussions that are progressing well. These applications will be treated as Reserved Matters and are expected to be submitted within the next eight weeks.

The current programme sees Hopkins starting physical construction in November 2015 with first occupations expected in summer 2016. This is approximately three months behind the timetable and valuation assumptions to which we were working at the time of Listing. The delay mostly reflects documenting the first agreement but is necessarily reflected in the CBRE valuation which is little changed at March 2015 from the September 2014 full year figures beyond intervening spend, since the initial delivery arrangements were not signed at that date. Accordingly, the carrying value per unserviced plot at Alconbury in the March 2015 interim balance sheet is £16,170 (September 2014: £15,400). The arrangements with Hopkins are expected to realise more than twice that amount back to the Group in first instance.

A number of significant milestones have also been passed at Rugby. The commercial purchase from BT and land transfer into a 50/50 joint venture with Aviva Investors was recognised at 31 March 2015, although the £17.5 million of total outstandings were only paid subsequently given the tripartite nature of the new commercial agreements. Part of the arrangements significantly simplified the interrelationship between the Sustainable Urban Extension, including 6,200 new dwellings connecting back into Rugby town centre for which we obtained outline planning consent last year, as distinct from the construction of DIRFT III Logistics Park on the other side of the A5, for which Prologis retain responsibility.

We continued to make good progress with the planning, infrastructure and habitats licences whilst the legals were being finalised. Natural England have granted the necessary licence to relocate our great crested newt population within Key Phase 1 into specially constructed holding areas and this work is underway. Rugby Borough Council and Warwickshire County Council have also approved the introduction of an additional entrance into the site, which will create an attractive arrival point for early residential sales and we are working with key stakeholders and utility providers to commence infrastructure works once the newts have been successfully relocated. A detailed masterplan design for Key Phase 1 has progressed sufficiently to allow formal marketing of first parcels to housebuilders to commence early next month. Initial discussions are already taking place, including with some parties disappointed not to have been selected at Alconbury.

First residential delivery at Rugby is probably running around four months later than Alconbury, with on-site infrastructure works commencing October 2015 through to March 2016 and housing starts from the first quarter of 2016 onwards. Unserviced plot carrying values of £12,125 are up from £11,500 at September 2014. The consolidated interim uplift was a little lower due to expensed corporate completion costs.

Newark has been described previously but to complete the monetisation chronology; first phase residential delivery is scheduled to follow after the completion of current road works from June 2016 onwards. Initial discussions with Nottinghamshire County Council over the initial primary school are taking place, again with the prospect of a Church of England run operation.

Notice was received last week that the Inspectors examining the Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire Local Plans (of which the proposed development at Waterbeach forms an integral part), had suspended the Examination in Public pending further work by the two authorities to demonstrate the soundness of their existing proposals. The brownfield nature of the former barracks at Waterbeach confers an independent presumption in favour of sustainable development. Discussions will be initiated with South Cambridgeshire District Council as to the manner in which the barracks land can assist in creating five year housing supply whilst maintaining the integrity of the longer term proposals to include adjoining lands.

Commercial and City Centre Projects

The objective of assembling income to cover Group running costs whilst generating development profits where proceeds can better be reinvested elsewhere maintains. Topping out has taken place at the Feethams Leisure scheme in Darlington with completion on schedule for March 2016. Offers are out on the two remaining unlet restaurant units which will take annual rent to almost £1.5 million per year on average 15 year leases and on undemanding terms. The externally appraised gross development value of £23.1 million represents a yield on cost of approximately 8 per cent. Off-site works are about to commence on the Sainsbury's store at Herne Bay, near Canterbury in Kent where the lease agreement is for a 25 year term with RPI uplifts subject to cap and collared increases of 4 per cent and 2 per cent respectively. Store completion is scheduled for March 2016. with an initial passing rent of £2.2 million per year. Funding yields have softened a little on large foodstores but this is a best in class defensive finance lease on account of the guaranteed minimum uplifts. Good progress continues to be made on our new on-terminal hotel at Stansted airport, where we are signing a headline 22 year franchise arrangement with our preferred brand and a separate (and shorter) operating agreement. The hotel size has been redesigned to accommodate an initial 357 rooms with the potential to enlarge if, as we expect, trading demand supports such expansion. Construction contracts are close to being settled with total projected outturn costs, including land, of £38 million for completion early in 2017. Current advice is for stabilised annual EBITDA of £3.4 million to be reached within three years of opening.

We are also looking to buy consumer facing investments where we are able to identify value and increase income through active management. We exchanged contracts in March and completed in April on an £11.5 million purchase of the Gallagher Retail Park, situated between Bradford and Leeds. The 75,000 sq. ft. leisure park, on approximately 8 acres of utilisable area including 840 car parking spaces, was bought on a net initial yield of 8.6 per cent, rising to an income of £1.1 million and a yield of 9.3 per cent following fixed rental uplift in September 2016. The unit divides between an over-sized Odeon multiplex cinema and Pure Gym who have recently taken an underlease from the original tenant, Virgin Active. All leases expire in 2025. The layout gives rise to a number of asset management opportunities, including the construction of two new drive-thru units and a rearrangement of the existing space. Our expectation is that implementation of these proposals will lift the yield on cost above 10 per cent and extend existing average lease lengths to 15 years.

The recent release of the first phase of 40 units at the Bridge Quay waterside development in Bristol could not have gone better. Construction works on the former Terrace Hill office property are screened by a near 50 foot high pop art image of Bridget, an enthusiast for central city living. Bridget basked in substantial local press coverage and we enjoyed the free publicity. More importantly, the entire release was reserved over a single weekend. The remaining 19 units fronting onto the water on the higher floors have been kept back. The forecast surplus of £2.7 million over March 2015 EPRA value ought to be comfortably exceeded, with realisations in the next financial year.

The completed retail and commercial development in Conduit Street, London W1 in which, sadly, the Group holds only an incentivised legacy management contract, is likely to command rents above £140 per sq. ft. We might only have wished for a more significant financial interest.

Design work continues on both our prime city centre sites in Manchester with Princess Street expected to be the first to be developed. At Deansgate the existing hotel is trading well and provides useful additional income.

Personal thanks

Continuing personal thanks to Board and staff colleagues; the pulling together and sense of identification established both within and outside the organisation in less than a year as a public company has been little short of remarkable. It is not something that we are about to squander, nor take for granted, as we collectively strive to work to the benefit of shareholders and stakeholders alike.

Nigel Hugill

Executive Chairman

27 May 2015

Finance review

Introduction

Highlights

The Group has had a successful six months of trading to 31 March 2015 with its IFRS NAV growing to £347.0 million (242.2 pence per share) from £335.1 million (238.5 pence per share, as of 30 September 2014).

KPIs

The Group considers the following to be its key performance indicators:

EPRA NAV- the Group considers EPRA NAV per ordinary share and changes in such value to be the most important indicator of the Group's performance. The EPRA NAV includes the fair value of all the Group's assets and liabilities. Under IFRS, the Group cannot reflect in its financial statements the fair value of its trading properties, which are carried in the financial statements at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Most analysts and shareholders compare the performance of property companies using EPRA NAV and this indicator is therefore of considerable importance to us.

The EPRA NAV at 31 March 2015 and 30 September 2014 was £371.1 million (259.0 pence per share) and £350.8 million (249.7 pence per share) respectively.

Total Shareholder Return- During the period we paid a dividend of 1.5 pence per share in respect of the period to 30 September 2014 and at 31 March 2015 the share price was 258.5 pence, resulting in an 11.34 per cent total shareholder return in the 10 months since Listing.

Transaction during the period

On 27 February 2015, the Group announced the acquisition of Catesby for an aggregate consideration of £34.0 million, payable as £22.0 million in cash and £12.0 million satisfied through the issue of 4,248,553 new, fully paid-up shares and 178,669 performance share awards, all valued at 263.50 pence per share. In accordance with IFRS, the value of the performance share awards issued as part of the transaction are being accounted for as a post-acquisition expense. Of the £12.0 million satisfied through the issue of new shares, 3,509,446 shares were issued and admitted to trading during March and the balance of 739,107 are expected to be issued on the first anniversary of the transaction. These outstanding shares have been included in equity as at 31 March 2015.

The Group has accounted for the transaction in accordance with IFRS 3 'Business Combinations' (revised) with both the consideration and assets and liabilities of Catesby having been fair valued as at the date of acquisition. A note explaining the determination of the fair values is included in note 2 to these condensed financial statements. As predicted in the announcement of the transaction, negative goodwill (described in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income as discount on acquisition) of £4.7 million has arisen as a consequence of the fair value exercise and this has been credited to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. The negative goodwill has been calculated as follows:

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income

The consolidated statement of comprehensive income includes the results of the Urban&Civic Group for the six months from 1 October 2014, including the results of Catesby for the period from its acquisition on 27 February 2015, to 31 March 2015. The comparative figures represent the six months' results of the Urban&Civic Group, prior to its acquisition of the Terrace Hill Group (on 22 May 2014) and Catesby, and therefore comparison with the current period results is not considered meaningful.

A commentary on significant items is set out below:

Revenue

Revenue for the period of £12.2 million includes £8.0 million in respect of the Sainsbury's foodstore development at Middlesbrough, which was forward sold during the period ended 30 September 2014, and the amount recognised reflects the progress on the project during the six month period under review. Rental income for the period included within revenue includes £1.2 million in relation to the Alconbury site, and £0.9 million in relation to commercial office assets in Teesside and London. We also recognised £1.6 million in respect of the hotel operations at our Deansgate, Manchester site.

Direct costs

Direct costs include £7.3 million relating to the Sainsbury's foodstore development mentioned above and £1.8 million directly related to the rental income for the period.

Administrative expenses

Administrative costs of £6.3 million were incurred in the period, reflecting six months of the combined Urban&Civic and Terrace Hill businesses and approximately one month of Catesby. We have capitalised administrative costs of £2.4 million into various projects, the majority of which has been added to the Alconbury project. Included within administrative expenses is £0.9 million of costs relating to the acquisition of Catesby, £0.9 million of share based remuneration that is credited to retained earnings and therefore has no impact on net asset value and £0.5 million of non-recurring costs.

Other

The £4.7 million discount on acquisition has arisen on the purchase of Catesby, as noted earlier.

The surplus on revaluation of investment properties of £1.7 million reflects the proportion of the increase in value of the Alconbury project relating to that element of Alconbury that is categorised as an investment property.

CBRE's valuation of Alconbury including both the investment and trading element has increased from £119.0 million at 30 September 2014 to £129.0 million at 31 March 2015. The principal reasons for the increase in value of this asset were:

As noted above, the Group has recognised £1.7 million of the £2.0 million valuation uplift through the income statement and the remaining £0.3 million is attributable to the element included within trading properties which is an adjustment for EPRA purposes.

Share of post-tax profit of joint venture

The Group has recognised £0.7 million representing its share of the post-tax profits of joint ventures. This represents our share of profit from the Rugby joint venture. During the period the Rugby joint venture recognised the transaction to acquire the Rugby site, albeit the consideration was paid over after 31 March 2015.

Surplus arising on revaluation of other investment

The Group has recognised £1.2 million arising from a revaluation to reflect proceeds received after the period end in respect of its investment in the entity which developed the office and mixed use scheme at Howick Place, London.

Release of other liabilities

The Group has recognised £1.9 million as a consequence of an acquired contingent tax liability which was accounted for as a fair value adjustment on the reverse acquisition of Terrace Hill in 2014. The tax investigation was settled in the Group's favour during the period under review and the fair value provision has therefore been reversed.

Net finance income

The amount of £0.3 million of net finance income relates to interest earned on bank deposits. For the majority of the period under review the Group had no bank borrowings.

Taxation expense

The tax charge for the period of £0.1 million includes a movement in deferred tax predominately in respect of the revaluation on Rugby of £0.1 million.

Dividend

The Group paid its maiden dividend in February 2015 at the rate of 1.5p per share, representing 0.67 per cent of the placing share price and amounting to £2.1 million. The Directors have approved plans to pay an interim dividend of 1.0 pence per share in respect of this six month period to shareholders on the register on 5 June 2015 with a payment date of 26 June 2015.

Consolidated balance sheet

Non-current assets

Investment properties

Included in investment properties is the Group's investment in Alconbury that the Group intends to retain as a long term investment, which comprises the commercial element of the land and 25 per cent of the residential land. The Alconbury site in its entirety has been valued by CBRE at 31 March 2015 at £129.0 million. The value of the investment property element of the site is £70.2 million. Also included in investment properties on the balance sheet is the Group's investment in the leisure scheme at Darlington which is currently under construction and has been valued by the Directors at £6.7 million. The Group had unconditionally exchanged on a retail park in Bradford at the interim date and this is included in investment properties at £11.6 million.

Investment in equity accounted joint ventures and associates

The Group's investment in its 50 per cent share of the Rugby joint venture has been included in the balance sheet at £15.8 million, which effectively represents its share of the external valuation of the Rugby site less amounts due to complete the transaction to acquire the site. The Group also includes here its £3.3 million investment in a joint venture that owns a strategic land site in Scotland.

Other investment

The Group's minority equity interest in the entity that owns the office investment at Howick Place, London is included in the balance sheet at a fair value of £6.6 million.

Deferred tax assets

The Group has recognised an asset of £8.4 million in respect of the Group's tax losses which are expected to be utilised against future profits of the Group.

Current assets

Trading properties

Trading properties have increased significantly during the period, from £78.1 million at 30 September 2014 to £144.3 million at 31 March 2015. The principal reasons for the increase and the principal properties included within trading properties are as follows:

We have apportioned the CBRE valuation of the Alconbury site between the trading and investment property elements and we have determined that the trading element is valued at £58.8 million, which is £7.3 million above its £51.5 million carrying value in the balance sheet. The increase in value cannot be reflected in the accounts but is included as a fair value adjustment in arriving at the EPRA NAV. The trading element of the Alconbury site increased in carrying value by £2.4 million due to expenditure during the period. The biggest increases in the Group's trading properties have been due to the purchase of the Manchester sites and Catesby. The Manchester sites at Deansgate and Princess Street in the heart of the city were acquired in December 2014 for a combined consideration of £22.4 million. The Group also accounted for SDLT of £1.0 million and further expenditure of £0.4 million in the period to 31 March 2015. The site at Deansgate includes the Marriott Renaissance Hotel which has generated a net income for the Group of £0.1 million since acquisition, which has been included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. The assets of Catesby included a strategic land site at Newark on Trent, a commercial office building at Doncaster and a number of land promotion interests. Collectively these have been fair valued at £34.1 million with subsequent expenditure of £2.8 million. Trading properties also include £19.2 million in respect of the Group's commercial development sites and £12.9 million in respect of other strategic land sites. All trading properties are carried in the balance sheet at the lower of cost (or acquisition date fair value) and net realisable value.

Trading and other receivables

Trading and other receivables are largely represented by £9.3 million due in respect of sales of land promotion sites which were executed by Catesby before its acquisition by the Group and which are due on a staged basis, £6.2 million recoverable under the construction contract in respect of the Sainsbury's foodstore at Middlesbrough, £1.7 million of accrued income under the same foodstore development and £1.3 million of recoverable VAT.

Cash

Cash balances were £107.6 million at the period end, down from £162.8 million at the end of September 2014. The principal expenditure in the period has been due to the continued expenditure at Alconbury (£8.9 million), the Manchester sites referred to above (£23.8 million), the cash element of the consideration paid for the acquisition of the Catesby Property Group (£18.7 million) and expenditure on the investment and development sites at Feethams, Darlington, Herne Bay, Kent and Bridge Quay, Bristol (£5.5 million). The total cash amount invested in our assets during the period was over £54.6 million with a further £50.6 million committed at the period end. The Group continues to manage its cash balances conservatively with security of deposit being a more important consideration than investment returns.

Non-current liabilities

Borrowings

Having taken advantage of certain banks' willingness to accept discounted payments in return for early settlement of bank loans during the period to 30 September 2014, resulting in no external debt at that date, the Group now has one external loan of £11.2 million as at 31 March 2015. This is a loan from the Homes and Communities Agency which has been drawn down to finance the construction of a link road at the Newark on Trent site, a site that formed part of the acquisition of Catesby. The loan has a final maturity date of March 2021 with repayments being made only out of land sales before that date. Interest is charged at 2.2 per cent over the EC reference rate which for the UK is currently 1.02 per cent and interest is compounded and added to the loan principal on a quarterly basis. The site at Newark on Trent provides the security for the loan.

Deferred tax liabilities

The deferred tax liability at 30 September 2014 largely reflects deferred tax on the valuation uplift reflected on the Group's interest in the site at Rugby.

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables include £3.3 million of deferred cash consideration which is due to the vendors of Catesby, £4.8 million of trade payables, £4.7 million relating to a deferred payment that was acquired with Catesby and £20.5 million of accruals, of which £9.5 million primarily relates to unpaid development costs and £11.0 million relates to the amount payable to complete the acquisition of the retail park at Bradford.

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

The movements in equity attributable to equity holders of the parent are set out in detail in the consolidated statement of changes in equity.

EPRA Net Asset Value

The EPRA NAV of the Group has been determined as follows:

Financial resources and capital management

The Group's net cash position at 31 March 2015 was £96.4 million. The Group expects to continue to invest its cash balances pursuant to its strategy of developing its strategic land and commercial development properties over the coming years. The Group expects to increase its external borrowings on a conservative basis and maintains strong relationships with a number of banks with whom it will expect to do business in the future. The Group monitors bank lending and interest rate markets closely and maintains a detailed five year business plan which it uses to predict its usage of its cash balances on a project by project basis.

Principal risks and uncertainties

The principal risks of the business are set out on pages 66 to 69 of the 2014 Report and Accounts and include commentary on their potential impact, link to the Group's strategic priorities and the relevant mitigation factors.

Since the publication of the 2014 Report and accounts, the Board believes that there has been no material change to the principal risks and the existing mitigation actions remain appropriate to manage the risks.

Responsibility Statement

We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:

(a) the condensed set of financial statements has been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 'Interim Financial Reporting';

(b) the interim management report includes a fair review of the information required by DTR 4.2.7R (indication of important events during the first six months and description of principal risks and uncertainties for the remaining six months of the year); and

(c) the interim management report includes a fair review of the information required by DTR 4.2.8R (disclosure of related party transactions and changes therein).

Signed on behalf of the Board on 27 May 2015

Jon Austen

Group Finance Director