Presented at the SITC 38th Annual Meeting, 3-5 November 2023, San Diego, CA, USA, and online | Abstract 656 |
ELI-002 Immunotherapy Induces Broad Polyfunctional T cell Responses in Subjects with High
Relapse Risk KRAS Mutated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Colorectal Cancer
James R. Perry1, Lochana M. Seenappa1, Haley VanWyk1, Amy M. Tavares1, Thian Kheoh1, Esther Welkowsky1, Christopher M. Haqq1, Peter C. DeMuth1,
and Lisa K. McNeil1
1 Elicio Therapeutics, Inc. 451 D St., Ste 501, Boston, MA 02210
Why Target mutated KRAS with Therapeutic Vaccination?
mKRAS T Cell Responses Correlate with Reduction in Risk of Relapse or Death13
Expansion of mKRAS-specific T cells by ELI-002 2P Immunization
1 Mutant KRAS Drives 25% of Solid Human Cancers
Prevalent among numerous tumor types1-2
Overall poor clinical prognosis3
Limited therapeutic options
2 Mutant KRAS is a Promising Tumor Antigen
Truncal: mutations occur early, expressed uniformly in all tumor cells
Driver: mKRAS signaling is required for tumor growth and survival
Highly prevalent: involved in ~25% of solid tumors1-2
Public neoantigen: not centrally tolerized, cognate TCRs present in naïve repertoire4-5
Promiscuous HLA presentation: potential off-the-shelf use in diverse patient population6-8
Proven Clinical MOA: mKRAS-specific T cells known to mediate anti- tumor efficacy4-5
Multi-targetingpotential: recognition of clonal and subclonal mKRAS variants to prevent escape9
KRAS mutant
NRAS mutant
5%
52% | 93% |
Colorectal Cancer (CRC) | Pancreatic Ductal |
US Incidence: 151k | Adenocarcinoma |
(PDAC) | |
US Incidence: ~56k |
Strength of T Cell Response | 86% Reduced Risk of Relapse or Death | Tumor Biomarker Response | ||||||||||
(%)Survivalfree-Relapse | ResponseBiomarkerOverall | Baseline)of(% | 300 | |||||||||
100 | Median RFS: not reached | P = 0.0017 | ||||||||||
200 | ||||||||||||
75 | ✱✱ | |||||||||||
50 | 100 | |||||||||||
25 | Median RFS: 3.91 months | Best | 0 | |||||||||
-100 | ||||||||||||
Months 0 | ||||||||||||
0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 18 | ≥ Median | < Median | ||||
T Cell Response | ||||||||||||
≥ Median T Cell Response (n = 12) | P = 0.0134 | Best Overall Tumor | Clearance | |||||||||
< Median T Cell Response (n = 10) | HR: 0.138 (0.031 - 0.610) | Biomarker Response | Reduction | |||||||||
Non-Responder | ||||||||||||
450 | Fold-change | Ex Vivo Fluorospot | Ex Vivo ICS | ||||||
and/orγIFN GrB SFC | 1300 | among | T cells | 4 | 0.1 mg | ||||
50 | 200 | ||||||||
Foldchange frombaseline | PBMC | 2 | 0.5 mg | ||||||
1.0 | |||||||||
30 | 150 | + | 2.5 mg | ||||||
Median: | 1x10/ | Cytokine% | CD8 | ||||||
10 | 13x | 6 | 100 | + | CD4or | 0.5 | 5.0 mg | ||
+ | |||||||||
5 | 50 | 10.0 mg | |||||||
0 | Max | 0 | Max | 0.0 | Max | ||||
Baseline | Baseline | Baseline | |||||||
Response | Response | Response |
- 87% of Patients generated direct ex vivo detectable mKRAS-specific T cell responses following ELI-0022P Immunization, with 100% Responders at the highest dose levels (5.0 and 10.0 mg)
Ex Vivo Responders | CD4 / CD8 Response | Specificity | Specificity | ||
13 | 13 | 10 | 10 | 20 | |
35 | |||||
50 | 25 | 5 | |||
87 | 38 | 30 | 65 | ||
Responders | CD4 + CD8 T cells | 7 antigens | G12R Responses |
Non-responders | CD8 T cells | 5-6 antigens | G12D Responses |
ELI-002 2P: Advancing Innovation for mKRAS Cancer Vaccines
1 Technological Innovation: Amphiphile Lymph Node Targeting Platform10-11 | 2 Clinical Innovation: Treatment in High Relapse-Risk Adjuvant Setting | |
Smart trafficking to the lymph nodes after subcutaneous dosing generates | Targeting surgically debulked tumors enables T cells to address minimal residual | |
immune responses with increased magnitude, function, and durability. | disease to potentially eliminate remaining tumor cells and protect against | |
Takes advantage of potent lymph node immune mechanisms, including activation | recurrence. | |
Activating the immune system before loss of HLA expression in the tumor | ||
of innate and adaptive cells, antigen-spreading, and improved tumor T cell | ||
trafficking / infiltration. | microenvironment in a chemotherapy-free window of opportunity. | |
Mutant KRAS peptides provide a validated antigen for application of the | Other oncology vaccines have typically been used in later lines of therapy for | |
Amphiphile platform. | advanced disease, after onset of tumor immune resistance. | |
Lymph node delivery of potent adjuvants minimizes systemic exposure to | In the adjuvant setting, tumor biomarkers (ctDNA, serum tumor antigen) are | |
improve safety. | early predictors of disease control or recurrence. |
Amphiphile mKRAS Long | 12 | |||
ELI-002 2P | Peptide Antigens | O | ||
1 | Amph-mKRAS G12D | O | ||
2 | Amph-mKRAS G12R | Albumin Binding Lipid | PEG Linker | G12D or G12R Peptide |
Amphiphile TLR-9 Agonistic | O | |||
NH | ||||
DNA Adjuvant | O | |||
NH | ||||
Amph-CpG-7909 | Albumin Binding Lipid | CpG-7909 DNA | ||
Inclusion of 18-mer G12D and G12R mKRAS peptides allows for delivery of diverse HLA I and II - restricted epitopes for presentation on varied patient HLA molecules.
Amphiphile (Amph)-modificationof peptides promotes binding to endogenous albumin at the injection site to promote collection in lymphatic vessels for lymph node delivery, and prevents peptide uptake into local capillaries avoiding delivery to irrelevant or tolerogenic sites.
Amph-CpG-7909provides potent immune activation via TLR-9 stimulation of lymph node-resident professional antigen presenting dendritic and other key immune cells.
Tissue Injection Site | Lymph Node | |
Amphiphiles | Endogenous Albumin | Albumin-bound Amphiphiles |
Albumin-bound Amphiphiles | Antigen Presenting Cell | T Cell | |||||||
1 Subcutaneous | 2 | Albumin | 3 | Lymph node | 4 | Delivery to | |||
injection | binding | targeting | immune cells |
Conventional vaccine components (e.g. peptide antigens and molecular adjuvants) are rapidly absorbed into blood capillaries after administration leading to poor delivery to lymph nodes where protective immune responses are orchestrated.
Amph-modification promotes albumin binding to reprogram vaccines for enhanced lymph node delivery resulting in coordinated transport of antigen and adjuvant to immune cells. Improved uptake by Antigen Presenting Cells results in enhanced antigen-presentation and co-stimulation to cognate T cells.
Restricted delivery to lymph nodes minimizes systemic exposure to avoid toxic effects of potent adjuvants.
Patient #23: mKRAS-specific T cell Profile - Ex Vivo Fluorospot
250 | G12R | 1000 | G12V | 1000 | WT KRAS | ||||
and/orIFNγ GrB SFC 1x10/ | 1x10/ | and/orIFNγ GrB SFC | 1x10/ | ||||||
200 | and/orIFNγ GrB SFC | 800 | 800 | ||||||
PBMC | 150 | PBMC | 600 | G12A | PBMC | 600 | |||
6 | 6 | G12S | 6 | ||||||
100 | 400 | 400 | |||||||
G13D | |||||||||
50 | 200 | 200 | |||||||
0 | 0 | 0 |
Week | B | 9 | Week | B | 9 | Week | B | 9 |
Week 9 | Week 9 | ||||||
IFNγ+ | IFNγ+ | • Elevated T cell responses to G12R | |||||
and G12D by Week 9 after prime | |||||||
GrB+ | GrB+ | immunization series | |||||
99 | IFNγ+ GrB+ | 99 | IFNγ+ GrB+ | • No responses were observed to | |||
99 | the WT antigen |
Patient #23: mKRAS-specific T cell Profile - Ex Vivo ICS Assay
8 | G12R | CD8 T Cells: Week 9 | G12R-Specific CD8: Week 9 | ||||||||
cells | |||||||||||
+ | 6 | G12D | IFNγ+ | mKRAS-specific, Cytokine+ | |||||||
Cytokine% | T | 2 | 10 | 48 | |||||||
amongCD8 | 2+ | 12 | 12 | ||||||||
+ | |||||||||||
4 | 42 | TNFα+ | 24 | 24 | 16 | ||||||
41 | |||||||||||
7 | 3+ | ||||||||||
0 | |||||||||||
Naïve | Effector Memory | ||||||||||
Week | B | 9 | |||||||||
Central Memory | TEMRA | ||||||||||
3 | G12R | CD4 T Cells: Week 9 | G12R-Specific CD4: Week 9 | ||||||||
+ | Tcells | ||||||||||
G12D | IFNγ+ | mKRAS-specific, Cytokine+ | |||||||||
Cytokine% | CD4among | 2 | 38 | 2+ | 28 | 52 | 31 | ||||
+ | 15 | IL2+ | 20 | 4 14 | |||||||
44 | α | + | |||||||||
1 | TNF | 51 | |||||||||
0 | 3 | 3+ | |||||||||
Week | B | 9 |
Patient #23 mKRAS-specific Memory T cell Profile - IVS
CD4 T cells | 2-4 antigens | G12R + G12D Responses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Responders | NR | 1 antigen | Neither | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(n = 20) | (n = 3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | G12R | Amph- | ex vivo T cell | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CpG Dose | response | fold- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of mKRAS | antigens/patient | 6 | G12D | Level | (n, %) | change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G12V | 0.1 mg | 2/3 (67%) | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | G12C | 0.5 mg | 5/6 (83%) | 82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G12A | 2.5 mg | 4/5 (80%) | 113 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G12S | 5.0 mg | 5/5 (100%) | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G13D | 10.0 mg | 4/4 (100%) | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No Response | Total | 20/23 (87%) | 56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cohort 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 1 2 3 |
- CD4 and CD8 T cell responses were observed, with 50% generating mixed CD4 + CD8 responses
- mKRAS-specific T cells were polyfunctional (IFNγ, TNFα, IL-2), specific to both immunizing and non-immunizing mKRAS antigens
Increased mKRAS-specific Memory T cells Assessed by IVS
baselinefromchangeFold | 100 | Fold-change | IVS Fluorospot | cellsT | 40 | IVS ICS | ||||
4500 | 0.1 mg | |||||||||
150 | SFCαTNFand/orγIFN | 1x10/ | Cytokine% | CD8among | 60 | |||||
50 | PBMC | 500 | + | + | 20 | 0.5 mg | ||||
20 | 400 | 8 | 2.5 mg | |||||||
6 | CD4 or | |||||||||
25 | 10 | |||||||||
15 | 300 | + | 6 | 5.0 mg | ||||||
10 | 200 | 4 | 10.0 mg | |||||||
5 | 100 | 2 | ||||||||
0 | Max | 0 | Max | 0 | Max | |||||
Baseline | Baseline | Baseline | ||||||||
Response | Response | Response |
- 100% of patients induce mKRAS-specific memory T cell responses after in vitro stimulation
Increased Polyfunctionality of mKRAS-specific T cells after ELI-002 2P Immunization
• | Patient #23 | T Cell Activation: Week 9 | Cytolysis: Week 9 | Proliferation: Week 9 |
- Polyfunctional T cell Profile:
- Increased activation,
cytolysis, and | CD8 | 0.71 | CD4 | 7.81 | CD4 | 5.02 | ||||||||
proliferation after | ||||||||||||||
vaccination | ||||||||||||||
CD137 | GrB | Ki67 | ||||||||||||
ELI-002 2P Immunization Elicits Durable mKRAS-specific Immune Responses
2000 | Patient 16 | • ELI-002 2P vaccination generates long-lasting mKRAS- |
AMPLIFY 201: Trial Design12
Prior Therapy | Screening Period | Amph-Peptides 2P 1.4 mg + 0.1, 0.5, 2.5, 5 or 10 mg Amph-CpG-7909 | ||||
Locoregional | mKRAS+ | Prime | No Dosing | Booster | Follow-up | |
G12R+ or G12D+ | ||||||
Therapy: | Immunization | Period | Immunization | Period | ||
Surgery | NED | |||||
+ | Imaging Negative | Week S/B 0 1 2 3 4 5 | 6 7 8 9 17 | 20 21 22 23 24 | 25 | 105 |
Neoadjuvant / | MRD+ | |||||
Dose | ||||||
Adjuvant | ||||||
ctDNA+ or | ctDNA | |||||
Chemotherapy | ||||||
serum biomarker+ | Serum biomarkers | |||||
PBMC
Patients | Baseline Characteristics: 20 Pancreatic (PDAC), 5 Colorectal (CRC) were evaluated for safety as of data cutoff: April 25, 2023 | |||
Safety | Safety: | No TEAEs ≥ Grade 3, no Dose Limiting Toxicities, no Cytokine Release Syndrome observed across all dose levels; | ||
44% had Grade 1-2 TEAEs: e.g. injection site reaction, fatigue, headache, nausea12 | ||||
AMPLIFY 201: Immunogenicity Methods
• Immunogenicity of ELI-0022P was assessed using longitudinally collected peripheral blood from 23 evaluable patients to assess specificity, polyfunctionality, |
antigen breadth, and phenotype of mKRAS-specific T cells. |
2500 | ||||
SFC | PBMC | 2000 | ||
TNFα | ||||
1500 | ||||
6 | ||||
IFNγand/or / 1x10 | 1000 | |||
500 | ||||
0 | ||||
Week | B | 9 | ||
4 | ||||
+ | cells | 3 | ||
% Cytokine | T | |||
+ | ||||
among CD8 | 2 | |||
1 | ||||
0 | ||||
Week | B | 9 |
G12R G12D
G12R G12D
% Cytokine Secretion in | SFC | 1000 | WT KRAS | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fluorospot: Week 9 | PBMC | 800 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
IFNγ+ | TNFα | 600 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | 27 | IFNγ+ TNFα+ | and/orIFNγ | 1x10/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
46 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TNFα+ | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Week | B | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | G12R | ||||
cells | |||||
+ | G12D | • After IVS stimulation, greatly | |||
Cytokine% | CD4among | 10 | increased T cell responses to G12R | ||
T | and G12D at Week 9 post prime | ||||
+ | |||||
immunization series | |||||
5 | • No responses were detected for the | ||||
WT antigen | |||||
0 | |||||
Week | B | 9 |
SFC | 1500 | Patient 18 | specific T cell responses | |||||
PBMC | 1000 | |||||||
Patient 20 | ||||||||
600 | • 100% (4/4) of evaluable patients maintain elevated T | |||||||
GrB | 6 | |||||||
and/or | 1x10 | 450 | Patient 11 | cell responses above baseline post-boost immunization | ||||
300 | ||||||||
IFNγ | / | • An increased post-boost T cell response was observed | ||||||
150 | ||||||||
in 75% (3/4) of evaluable patients compared to pre- | ||||||||
0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | boost T cell levels | ||
0 | ||||||||
Weeks post-vaccination |
T Cell Response | 86% Reduced Risk of Relapse or Death | |
MESSAGES | MOA Correlated to: | Tumor Biomarker Response |
Lymph node-targeted Therapeutic mKRAS-specific Cancer Vaccine ELI-002 2P: | ||
Direct ex vivo mKRAS-specific T cell responses observed in 87% of patients | ||
and IVS responses were observed in 100% of patients | ||
HOME | 50% of patients generated both CD4 and CD8 T cell responses | |
T cells exhibited robust functional quality: activation, cytokine production, | ||
• PBMCs from each patient were individually stimulated with overlapping peptides for each of the seven mKRAS antigens (G12R, G12D, G12V, G12C, G12A, |
G12S and G13D) and the WT antigen, for evaluation of mKRAS-specific T cell responses using both direct ex vivo and in vitro stimulated assays. |
• T cell responses and polyfunctionality were determined by a direct ex vivo IFNγ/Granzyme B (GrB) Fluorospot and a 10-dayin vitro stimulated (IVS) |
IFNγ/TNFα Fluorospot assay, where a positive immune response was defined as >2-fold over baseline and at least 50 SFC per million PBMCs. |
• Polyfunctionality and phenotype of patient T cells were further characterized using an ex vivo and IVS intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay, where |
responder populations were defined as >2-fold over baseline and a frequency of at least 0.1% Cytokine+. The ICS assay included markers for CD3, CD4, CD8, |
Memory (CCR7, CD45RA, CD45RO), cytokines (IFNγ, TNFα, IL2), cytolysis (GrB, Perforin, CD107a), activation markers (CD69, CD137, CD154), and proliferation |
(Ki67). |
References
1. | Bianken A, et al. Nature. 2012; 491(7424): 399-405 | 5. | Tran E, et al. NEJM. 2016; 375(23): 2255-2262 | 9. | Awad MM, et al. Cancer Cell. 2022; 40(9): 1010- | |
2. | Prior IA, et al. Cancer Research. 2012; 72(10): | 6. | Bear AS, et al. Nat. Commun. 2021; 12(1): s41467- | 1026 | ||
2457-2467 | 021-24562-2 | 10. | Liu H, et al. Nature. 2014; 507: 519-522 | |||
3. | Siegel RL, et al. Cancer J. Clin. 2021; 71(1): 7-33 | 7. | Carbone DP, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(22): 5099- | 11. | Moynihan KD, et al. Nature Medicine. 2016; | |
4. | Leidner R, et al. NEJM. 2022; 386(22): 2112-2119 | 5107 | 22(12): 1402-1410 | |||
8. | Palmer CD, et al. Br. J. Cancer 2020; 122(7): 971-977 | 12. | O'Reilly EM, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023; 41(16): 2528 | |||
13. | Wainberg Z, et al. 2023 AACR Special Pancreatic. | |||||
Acknowledgements | 2023 | |||||
• We are grateful to the patients who participated in the study, their families, and the investigators and staff at the participating institutions.
cytolytic capacity, proliferation, memory phenotype | |
| 100% (4/4) of patients evaluable for durability maintained elevated T cell |
TAKE | responses above baseline |
Phase 1, randomized Phase 2 Study of ELI-002 7P (NCT05726864) in PDAC patients: targeting G12D, R, V, C, A, S, G13D
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Elicio Therapeutics Inc. published this content on 03 November 2023 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 10 November 2023 14:37:53 UTC.