Fitch Ratings has affirmed India-based Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited's (BPCL) Long-Term Foreign-Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'BBB-'.

The Outlook is Stable. We have also affirmed BPCL's senior unsecured rating and the ratings on its outstanding senior unsecured debt at 'BBB-'. Fitch has also affirmed the rating on subsidiary BPRL International Singapore Pte. Ltd.'s US-dollar guaranteed notes at 'BBB-'.

Fitch equates BPCL's rating with its largest shareholder, India (BBB-/Stable), under our Government-Related Entities (GRE) Rating Criteria.

We maintain BPCL's Standalone Credit Profile (SCP) at 'bb+', as we expect net leverage to improve to a level in line with the SCP from the financial year ending March 2025 (FY25), after breaching the SCP's negative sensitivity over FY23-FY24. We expect negative FY23 EBITDA on marketing losses from retail price-freezes for petrol, diesel and liquified petroleum gas (LPG), despite surging oil prices. However, increased state support, especially on regulated products like LPG, may ease the burden (not factored into our base case).

The Indian government called off BPCL's strategic divestment process in early-June 2022.

Key Rating Drivers

Strength of State Linkage: Fitch assesses BPCL's status, ownership and control by the sovereign as 'Strong'. The state directly owns 53% and appoints the board. The record of state support is also 'Strong'. BPCL has in the past received tangible support from India through Parliament-approved subsidies to meet under-recoveries on products sold below market prices, and indirect government support for its overseas upstream acquisitions.

Government Incentive to Support: We see the socio-political implications of a default by BPCL as 'Very Strong'. It would disrupt economic activity and significantly affect India's energy security, as BPCL is a leading oil refiner and oil-marketing company (OMC) with a key role in importing crude oil to meet a large share of India's energy needs. Fitch sees the financial implications of a default as 'Strong' because BPCL is a key state-owned borrower. A default may have a strong impact on availability and cost of financing for India and other GREs, particularly state-owned OMCs.

Marketing Margins Under Pressure: Fitch expects BPCL to generate gross marketing losses in FY23, as the Indian OMCs bear the largest burden of surging crude oil prices, with only limited increases being passed on to consumers despite cuts in taxes on retail sales. We believe near-term prices will remain a function of the government's efforts to balance OMCs' financial health with inflationary and fiscal pressures. However, the marketing segment should turn profitable from FY24 as crude oil prices fall to Fitch's assumption of USD80 per barrel.

We expect marketing margins to remain aligned with crude oil prices over the long term. The government previously allowed OMCs to recoup losses from the temporary suspension of daily price resets in subsequent periods. However, prolonged state interference in auto-fuel retail prices and marketing losses could be negative for BPCL's SCP.

Temporary Weakness in Credit Metrics: We expect BPCL's debt to increase in FY23 on EBITDA losses, and net debt/EBITDA to remain marginally higher than the negative trigger for its SCP of 3.0x in FY24 (FY22: 2.3x). However, falling crude oil prices and the resultant reversal in marketing losses would improve leverage to levels commensurate with the SCP from FY25. This deleveraging is subject to the risk of a prolonged period of high crude oil prices squeezing marketing margins.

Potential LPG Subsidies: Media indicates that OMCs may receive government support in FY23 to partly cover under-recoveries from inadequate pass-through of imported LPG prices since 2HFY22, and the re-introduction of government subsidies on LPG cylinders since May 2022. Our scenario analysis suggests INR50 billion of additional cash received in FY23 could improve BPCL's expected leverage by 0.2x-0.3x versus the rating case.

Demand Above Pre-Pandemic Levels: Fitch expects BPCL's marketing volumes to rise to around 48 million metric tons (MMT) in FY23, from 44.6MMT in FY22. This is based on our expectation of a 7% growth in India's GDP, as mobility and economic activity improve after the pandemic. BPCL's 1QFY23 marketing volumes of 12.3MMT were one of its highest; and while demand may dip seasonally in 2QFY23 with the monsoons, it should pick up again in 2HFY23 on the holiday season.

GRMs Above Historical Highs: BPCL reported record gross refining margins (GRMs) of USD27.5 per barrel in 1QFY23, benefiting from all-time-high product spreads, as demand for refined products recovered to pre-Covid levels, while supply tightened following a drop in exports from Russia and China, along with inventory gains.

Product spreads have since narrowed on easing of tight industry conditions and emerging worries over the demand impact of a potential global recession. Nonetheless, spreads for diesel, which forms around 45% of BPCL's product slate, remain well above long-term historical averages and should support GRMs, notwithstanding the recent correction in petrol cracks. We expect GRMs to moderate in the rest of FY23, with the full-year average of USD14 remaining the highest.

High Capex: Fitch expects annual capex of INR100 billion over FY23-FY26, with most spent on the marketing, petrochemical and refining segments. BPCL seeks to add around 1,500 retail outlets per year for the next few years. Pre-project activities are ongoing to set up a 1.2 million tonne per annum (mtpa) ethylene cracker at its Bina refinery and a 0.4mtpa polypropylene project at Kochi Refinery over the next four years, with small projects to revamp existing refineries under way. BPCL intends to invest around INR10 billion-15 billion per year each in its city gas distribution and upstream business.

Dominant Market Position: BPCL's SCP reflects its position as one of India's top-three OMCs, with a 14% share in India's refining capacity and a 24% share of fuel retail outlets. The SCP also reflects the above-average complexity of BPCL's refining assets and its gradually improving vertical integration, supported by upstream and petrochemical investments.

Derivation Summary

BPCL's closest peers under Fitch's GRE Rating Criteria are Indian Oil Corporation Ltd (IOC, BBB-/Stable, SCP: bb+) and Indonesia's PT Pertamina (Persero) (BBB/Stable, SCP: bbb-).

Fitch's assessment of all GRE factors is the same for both IOC and BPCL. We assess the socio-political implications of a default by the two companies as 'Very Strong', as these state-controlled OMCs import a large share of India's crude oil and a default would jeopardise their ability to do so, disrupting the economy. We assess the status, ownership and control; support record; and financial implications of default factors as 'Strong' for both IOC and BPCL.

Pertamina's status, ownership and control by the sovereign is considered 'Very Strong', as the government fully owns the national oil company, appoints its board and senior management, and directs and approves investments. We also see its support record as 'Very Strong' because Pertamina consistently receives subsidies for selling certain petroleum products below market price. Fitch regards the socio-political and financial implications of a default as 'Very Strong', given Pertamina's monopoly position in downstream operations in Indonesia and its role as a proxy borrower for the state.

Key Assumptions

Fitch's key assumptions within our rating case for the issuer include:

Brent crude oil at USD96.3 per barrel in FY23, USD80 in FY24, and USD62 FY25, in line with Fitch's oil price deck.

FY23 refining throughput and marketing volume at or above pre-pandemic levels, and demand growth of 2%-3% thereafter.

GRM of USD14 per barrel in FY23, and around mid-cycle levels of USD6 thereafter.

Marketing losses in FY23, gradually improving to normal levels by FY24.

Annual capex of INR100 billion over FY23-FY26.

Dividend payout ratio of around 60% over FY24-FY26 (versus management expectation 30% - 40%).

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:

An upgrade of the sovereign rating, provided the likelihood of support from the state remains strong

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:

A downgrade of the sovereign rating

Likelihood of support from the state declines significantly

For the sovereign rating of India, the following sensitivities were outlined by Fitch in its rating action commentary of 10 June 2022:

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:

Public Finances: Rising general government debt/GDP ratio, for instance, from insufficient fiscal consolidation

Macro: A structurally weaker real GDP growth outlook, for instance, due to financial-sector weakness or reform implementation that is lacking, further weighing on the debt trajectory

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:

Public Finances: Implementation of a credible medium-term fiscal strategy to bring post-pandemic general government debt down towards the levels of 'BBB' category peers

Macro: Higher medium-term investment and growth rates without the creation of macroeconomic imbalances, such as from successful structural reform implementation and a healthier financial sector

Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10111579.

Liquidity and Debt Structure

Strong Funding Access: BPCL had cash and equivalents of INR66 billion and sanctioned undrawn credit lines of INR150 billion at FY22. It has INR196 billion of debt maturities in FY23, including INR121 billion of current maturities of long-term debt. We expect BPCL to roll over its short-term debt, on account of its robust operating profile.

We expect BPCL to report neutral to negative free cash flow in the next few years, although it should secure adequate funding, if needed, due to its ready access to domestic and international capital and banking markets, strong linkages with the sovereign, and importance in maintaining India's energy security.

Issuer Profile

BPCL, which is majority owned by the state, is the third-largest refiner in India with a capacity of 35.3 million tonnes per year and the joint second-largest marketer of petroleum products, with around 24% market share through 20,217 retail outlets. It also operates upstream and city-gas distribution businesses.

REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING

The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.

Public Ratings with Credit Linkage to other ratings

BPCL's Long-Term IDR is equalised with that of the Indian sovereign. A change in Fitch's rating on the sovereign would automatically result in a change in the company's ratings.

ESG Considerations

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit www.fitchratings.com/esg

(C) 2022 Electronic News Publishing, source ENP Newswire