?

Mercom Oil Sands Plc

("Mercom" or "the Company")

Interim Results for the six months to 30 September 2013

Chairman's Statement

I am pleased to present my Chairman's statement for Mercom Oil Sands plc ("the Company") for the period ending 30th September 2013.

In the Annual Report for the Financial Year ending 31st March 2013, I reported that the CEO and the Board had decided to review the Company's strategy, including the Farm-in Agreement which had been reached with Nordic Petroleum ASA ("Nordic") to acquire a 50% share of the Chard Oil Sands Reserve. I also reported that the Board had concluded that the merits of the transaction had been overtaken by subsequent events, and that the Company had sought to negotiate a revision to the terms of the Farm in Agreement. Ultimately the negotiations with Nordic broke down, and the matter became the subject of an agreed arbitration procedure in Canada.

While this matter was being resolved it was difficult to assess the long term strategic options available to the Company, so on 24th May 2013 the Company held a General Meeting to secure shareholder support for a new strategy, which was duly approved. The new strategy is to create shareholder value through the investment of its cash assets in the natural resources and energy sectors, with a focus on oil and gas.  The Board of Mercom believes this will generate better returns while bank deposit rates remain low and its Farm-in Agreement with Nordic is being resolved.  However in the six months to the end of September the Board was focussed on the arbitration issue, and no strategic investments have yet been made. The Interim Accounts accordingly show that the Company had cash reserves of   £1.31m at the end of September, after corporate expenses of £133,819 hadbeen incurredin the first half year.

After the Interim Accounts for the period were closed, the Company announced that it has reached an out of court settlement with regard to its dispute over the Farm-in Agreement relating to the Chard Oil Sands leases in Canada.  The Company agreed to pay CAD$275,000, together with the issue of 12,954,545 new Ordinary Shares in Mercom, to Nordic in full and final settlement of the dispute. Also after the accounts were closed, the Company announced that it had issued 200,000,000 new Ordinary Shares ("New Shares"). The New Shares have been issued at 0.3p per OrdinaryShare, raising an additional £600,000 of equity.

The Directors have begun the process of identifying investment opportunities which match the new approved strategy, and of evaluating the potential profitability and risks associated with those discovered so far. The General Meeting and the Resolutions approved by the shareholders, and the resolution of the Nordic arbitration have created clarity.  The Board to now ready to move forward with renewed confidence. 

????????????

Dr Patrick Cross

Chairman

19 December 2013


MERCOM OIL SANDS PLC

Condensed Interim Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

For the six month period ended 30 September 2013



6 months ended 30 September

Period ended 30 September



2013

2012


Note

Unaudited

Unaudited

Continuing Operations


£

£

Expenses




General and administrative expenses


133,819

1,647,269

Exploration and evaluation expenses

6    

-

64,490

Loss from Operations

(133,819)

(1,711,759)

Other items




Investment revenue


-

-

Loss for the period before taxation

(133,819)

(1,711,759)

Taxation


-

-

Loss for the period attributable to equity holders

(133,819)

(1,711,759)





Other comprehensive income


-     

-

Total comprehensive loss for the period


(133,819)

(1,711,759)









Loss per Ordinary share




Basic - continuing and total operations

11

(0.00)

(0.01)

Diluted  - continuing and total operations

11

(0.00)

(0.01)


MERCOM OIL SANDS PLC

Condensed Interim Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

As at 30 September 2013


Note

As at 30 September

As at 30 September

As at 31 March



2013

2012

2013



Unaudited

Unaudited

Audited



£

£

£

Non-current assets





Investments

5

-

-

-

Exploration and evaluation assets

6

-

-

-



-

-

-






Current assets





Cash and cash equivalents


1,310,517

2,139,304

1,468,306

Trade and other receivables

7

567,965

72,846

506,394

Total current assets


1,878,482

2,212,150

1,974,700






TOTAL ASSETS


1,878,482

2,215,150

1,974,700






LIABILITIES AND EQUITY





Current liabilities





Trade and other payables

8

169,865

184,000

132,264

Total liabilities


169,865

184,000

132,264






Equity





Share capital

10

332,285

263,764

332,285

Share premium

10

2,535,168

2,413,875

2,535,168

Shares to be issued reserve

10

1,000,000

1,000,000

1,000,000

Warrant reserve

10

62,270

62,270

62,270

Accumulated deficit


(2,221,106)

(1,711,759)

(2,087,287)

Total equity


1,708,617

2,028,150

1,842,436






TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES


1,878,482

2,212,150

1,974,700








MERCOM OIL SANDS PLC

Condensed Interim Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

For the six month period ended 30 September 2013


6 months ended 30 September

Period ended 30 September


2013

2012


Unaudited

Unaudited


£

£

Cash flow from operating activities



Loss for the period before tax

(133,819)

(1,498,902)

Adjustments for:



Share based payment charge

-

62,270

Increase in trade and other receivables

(61,571)

(72,846)

Increase in trade and other payables

37,601

184,000

Cash used in operations

(157,789)

(1,538,335)




Cash flow from investing activities



Purchase of exploration and evaluation assets

-

-

Net cash used in investing activities

-

-




Cash flow from financing activities



Proceeds from issue of shares, net of costs

-

3,677,639

Net cash generated from financing activities

-

3,677,639







(Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents

(157,789)

2,139,304

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period

1,468,306

-




Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period

1,310,517

2,139,304



MERCOM OIL SANDS PLC

Condensed Interim Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

For the period ended 30 September 2013

Share capital

Share premium

Shares to be issued

Warrant reserve

Retained earnings

Total


£

£

£

£

£

£








As at 15 February 2012

-

-

-

-

-

-

Shares issued in period

263,764

2,413,875

1,000,000

-

-

3,677,639

Share based payment charge

-

-

-

62,270

-

62,270

Total comprehensive loss for the     year

-

-

-

-

(1,711,759)

(1,711,759)








As at 30 September 2012

263,764

2,413,875

1,000,000

62,270

(1,711,759)

2,028,150

Share

capital

Share premium

Shares to be issued

Warrant reserve

Retained earnings

Total


£

£

£

£

£

£








As at 31 March 2013 (Audited)

332,285

2,535,168

1,000,000

62,270

(2,087,287)

1,842,436

Total comprehensive loss for the year

-

-

-

-

(133,819)

(133,819)








As at 30 September 2013 (Unaudited)

332,285

2,535,168

1,000,000

62,270

(2,221,106)

1,708,617


1.   BASIS OF PRESENTATION                                                                                                                                                      

Basis of presentation and statement of compliance

These interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting. They do not include all the information required for a complete set of IFRS financial statements. However, selected explanatory notes are included to explain events and transactions that are significant to an understanding of the changes in the Group's financial position and performance since the last annual consolidated financial statements as at and for the period ended 31 March 2013.  These interim financial statements were authorised for issue by the Company's Board of Directors on 16 December 2013.

The Comparative figures for the period ended 31 March 2013 are from the date of incorporation of the Company being 15 February 2012.

Basis of consolidation

The Group financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiary undertaking Mercom Oil Sands Canada Inc., a company incorporated in Canada. The results of subsidiary undertakings sold or acquired are included in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income up to, or from the date control passes. Intra group sales and profits are eliminated fully on consolidation.

Functional currency

The presentational and functional currency of the Group and Company is U.K Sterling.

Significant accounting estimates and judgments

The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual outcomes could differ from these judgments and estimates. The financial statements include judgments and estimates which, by their nature, are uncertain. The impacts of such judgments and estimates are pervasive throughout the financial statements, and may require accounting adjustments based on future occurrences. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised and the revision affects both current and future periods.

Significant assumptions about the future and other sources of judgments and estimates that management has made at the statement of financial position date, that could result in a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities, in the event that actual results differ from assumptions made, relate to, but are not limited to, the following:

·     Management's position that there are no income tax considerations required within these audited financial statements; and

·     The carrying value of trade and other receivables.

Going concern

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") applicable to a going concern, which assume that the Company will be able to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of operations. The Company has no current source of operating revenues and its capacity to operate as a going concern in the near-term will likely depend on its ability to continue raising equity or debt financing. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to raise funds in which case the Company may be unable to meet its obligations. Should the Company be unable to realise on its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business, the net realisable value of its assets may be materially less than the amounts recorded in the Consolidated and Company Statements of Financial Position. The financial statements do not include adjustments to amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue operations.

2.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES                                                                                                                              

Except as described below, the accounting policies applied in these interim financial statements are the same as those applied in the Group's consolidated financial statements as at and for the period ended 31 March 2013. The following changes in accounting policies are also expected to be reflected in the Group's consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ending 31 March 2014.

Changes in accounting policies

The following new standards, amendments to standards or interpretations were mandatory for the Group for the first time for the financial period beginning 1 April 2013, but are not currently considered to be relevant to the Group (although they may affect the accounting for future transactions and events):

·      IFRS 10, 'Consolidated Financial Statements', effective from 1 January 2013. This standard builds on existing principles by identifying the concept of control as the determining factor in which an entity should be included within the consolidated financial statements. The standard provides additional guidance to assist in determining control where this is difficult to assess.

·      IFRS 11, 'Joint arrangements', effective from 1 January 2013. This standard establishes principles for financial reporting by parties to a joint arrangement.

·      IFRS 12, 'Disclosure of interests in other entities', effective from 1 January 2013. This standard includes the disclosure requirements for all forms of interests in other entities, including joint arrangements, associates, structured entities and other off balance sheet vehicles.

·      IFRS 13, 'Fair value measurement', effective from 1 January 2013. This standard aims to improve consistency and reduce complexity by providing a precise definition of fair value and a single source of fair value measurement and disclosure requirements for use across IFRSs. The requirements, which are largely aligned between IFRSs and US GAAP, do not extend the use of fair value accounting but provide guidance on how it should be applied where its use is already required or permitted by other standards within IFRSs or US GAAP.

·      IAS 1, 'Other Comprehensive Income', effective from 1 January 2013. The main change resulting from these amendments is a requirement for entities to group items presented in other comprehensive income on the basis of whether they are potentially reclassifiable to profit or loss subsequently. The amendments do not address which items are presented in other comprehensive income.

·      IAS 19 (Revised), 'Employee Benefits' effective from 1 January 2013. These amendments are intended to provide a clearer indication of an entity's obligations resulting from the provision of defined benefit pension plan and how those obligations will affect its financial position, financial performance and cash flow.

·      IAS 27 (Revised), 'Separate Financial Statements' (Revised), effective from 1 January 2013  has the objective of setting standards to be applied in accounting for investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures, and associates when an entity elects, or is required by local regulations, to present separate (non-consolidated) financial statements.

·      IAS 28 (Revised), 'Associates and Joint Ventures' (Revised), effective from 1 January 2013 prescribes the accounting for investments in associates and sets out the requirements for the application of the equity method when accounting for investments in associates and joint ventures.

·      Amendment to IAS 32, 'Offsetting Financial Assets and Liabilities', effective from 1 January 2013 clarifies that the tax effect of a distribution to holders of equity instruments should be accounted for in accordance with IAS 32.

2.   SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

The following new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations have been issued, but are not effective for the financial period beginning 1 April 2013 and have not been early adopted:

·      IFRS 9, 'Financial instruments', issued in November 2009 and effective from 1 January 2015. IFRS 9 represents the first phase of the IASB's project to replace IAS 39 'Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement'. It sets out the classification and measurement criteria for financial assets and liabilities and requires all financial assets, including assets currently classified under IAS 39 as available for sale, to be measured at fair value through profit and loss unless the assets can be classified as held at amortised cost. Qualifying equity investments held at fair value may have their fair value changes taken through other comprehensive income by election.

3CAPITAL AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT                                                                                                             

The capital of the Group consists of shareholders' equity. The Group's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group's ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the development of its mineral properties and to maintain optimal returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders.

The Group manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust its capital structure, the Group may attempt to issue new shares or debt, dispose of assets, or adjust the amount of cash and cash equivalents.

The properties in which the Group currently has an interest are in the exploration and evaluation stage; as such the Group is dependent on external financing to fund its activities. In order to carry out the planned exploration and pay for administrative costs, the Group will spend its existing working capital and raise additional amounts as needed. The Group will continue to assess new properties and seek to acquire an interest in additional properties if it feels there is sufficient geologic or economic potential and if it has adequate financial resources to do so.

Management reviews its capital management approach on an ongoing basis and believes that this approach, given the relative size of the Group, is reasonable. There were no changes in the Group's approach to capital management during the period ended 30 September 2013. The Group is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

Credit risk

All the Group's cash and cash equivalents are held with well-known and established financial institutions. As such, management considers credit risk related to these financial assets to be minimal. The Group's maximum credit risk exposure is limited to the carrying value of its cash and subscriptions receivable. At 30 September 2013, the Group had no material amounts deemed to be uncollectible.

Commodity price risk

Commodity price risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows will fluctuate as a result of changes in oil and natural gas commodity prices. The nature of the Group's operations will result in exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices. The Group is currently in its development stage and as such the exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices is not actively managed. In the future, the Group may use commodity price contracts to manage exposure to fluctuations in pricing.

Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk is the risk that future cash flows will fluctuate as a result of changes in market interest rates. The Group does not have a material exposure to this risk as there are no outstanding debt facilities.

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they come due. The Group ensures, as far as possible, that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, without incurring unacceptable losses or harm to the Group's reputation.

The Group utilises authorisation for expenditures to further manage capital expenditures and attempts to match its payment cycle with available cash resources.

Foreign currency risk

The Group is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations on its cash which is denominated in U.K. Sterling and Canadian Dollars.

4SEGMENTAL REPORTING                                                                                                                                                          

The Directors consider that the primary reporting business format is by business segment which in the period was just the acquisition, exploration and development of petroleum and natural gas interests, as this formed the basis of internal reports regularly reviewed by the Board in order to allocate resources to the segment and assess its performance.  Therefore the disclosures for the primary segment have already been provided in these financial statements. 

The secondary reporting format is by geographical analysis. However there is no revenue and no customers in the period and no non-current assets at 30 September 2013 and thus no geographical analysis disclosure has been presented in these financial statements.

5INVESTMENTS                                                                                                                                                                               


The Company has a shareholding in the following company incorporated in Canada:






Proportion




Subsidiary undertakings

Holding


held  


Nature of Business


Mercom Oil Sands Canada Inc.

Common shares

(Nil Par Value)


100%


Investment company

6EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS                                                                                                                       


Group






£










At 15 February 2012






-


Additions






64,490


Impairment against lease deposit






(64,490)










At 31 March 2013 and 30 September 2013






-










Exploration and evaluation assets consisted of the Group's exploration projects. Additions represented the deposit to acquire petroleum and natural gas leases as detailed below. As at 30 September 2013, the Group holds no exploration and evaluation assets.

On 24 February 2012, Norwegian Oil Sands Corp., a legally enacted entity incorporated pursuant to the laws of the Province of Alberta and subsidiary undertaking of Nordic Petroleum ASA, a company incorporated in Norway, agreed to sell to the Company a 50% working interest in four Alberta Crown Oil Sands Leases (the "Leases") and assets held in connection therewith (the "Agreement"). According to the Agreement, for the Company to acquire interest in the Leases, it had to:


(a) pay a cash amount of C$700,000 to Norwegian Oil Sands Corp., as follows:

(i)    C$100,000 deposit (paid), no later than 5 days after execution of the agreement;

(ii)   C$100,000 extension fee (paid) on or before 30 May 2012; and

(iii)  C$500,000 upon transfer of the 50% interest in the Leases; and




(b) be obligated to fund the first C$2,500,000 of the capital costs of the appraisal program.




On 2 August 2012, the Company negotiatedan extension to with Nordic Petroleum ASA for the completion of the Farm-in agreement by 31 October 2012. In return for the extension, the Company paid an extension fee of £100,000.


On 12 November 2012, Mercom announced its withdrawal from the Farm-in agreement with Nordic Petroleum ASA as the Company had been unable to reach a working agreement. The cost of the lease deposit was fully impaired in the period.

7.TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES                                                                                                                                       






30 September 2013 Unaudited

£


30 September 2013 Unaudited

£

31 March 2013 Audited

£












Other receivables




567,965


72,846

506,394















567,965


72,846

506,394


In January 2013, the Group entered in to a contract to purchase 20,000 cubic meters of Gasoil at a price of US$775 per cubic meter. On entering the contract the Group paid a refundable deposit of £499,900. If the Group chooses not to perform on the contract, the deposit will be refunded. The contractor, at their sole discretion, has the right to impose a 2.25% fee for any amounts refunded for non-performance. As at 30 September 2013, the deposit remains outstanding.

8.  TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES           






30 September 2013 Unaudited

£


30 September 2012 Unaudited

£

31 March   2013    Audited

£











Trade payables




169,865


184,000

117,764


Accruals and deferred income




-


-

14,500















169,865


184,000

132,264










9.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES                                                                                                      


The Group's related parties, as defined by International Accounting Standard 24 (revised), the nature of the relationship and the amount of transactions with them during the period ended 30 September 2013 were as follows:

The Group was charged £12,000 in consulting fees by CFO Advantage Inc., a company that is controlled by K. Appleby (Finance Director). At 30 September 2013, the Company owed CFO Advantage Inc. £8,000.


The Group was charged £10,425 in consulting fees by AT Investments, a company of which A.E. Taubi (Non-executive Director) is a director of. As at 30 September 2013, the Company owed AT Investments £2,000.

The Group was charged £12,000 in consulting fees by Dr P.H. Cross (Non-executive Chairman). At 30 September 2013 the Company owed Dr. Cross £4,853.

10. SHARE CAPITAL                                                                                                                                                                       


a)      Shares authorised

The Company is authorised to issue an unlimited number of preferred and Ordinary shares.  The authorised share capital of the Company is 400,000,000 Ordinary shares of £0.001 each.  No preferred shares have been issued.

b)      Ordinary shares issued

Called up, allotted and fully paid:


30 September 2013

£


323,285,256 Ordinary shares of £0.001

323,285



No shares were issued by the Company in the current period. The Company issued Ordinary shares in the prior period as follows:


(i)      On 15 February 2012, the Company issued 20,000,000 Ordinary shares of £0.001 each at par.

(ii)     On 5 March 2012, the Company issued 33,110,000 Ordinary shares of £0.001 each at par.

(iii)    On 23 March 2012, the Company issued 226,890,000 Ordinary shares of £0.001 each at par.

(iv)   On 15 May 2012, the Company issued 3,375,000 Ordinary shares of £0.001 each at £0.08 per share.

(v)    On 23 May 2012, the Company issued 33,500,000 Ordinary shares of £0.001 each at £0.10 per share.

(vi)   On 5 December 2012, the Company issued 16,410,256 Ordinary shares of £0.001 each at £0.01365 per sharein settlement of outstanding consultancy fees to a third party. 

10,000,000 of the 33,500,000 Ordinary shares of £0.001 each issued on 23 May 2012 have been fully paid but not yet allotted. The par value and premium paid for these shares are held in the shares to be issued reserve.




c)      Share purchase warrants

The following summarises the activity:



Warrants

outstanding


Value

£


Issued

7,000,000


270


Issued

1,000,000


62,000







Balance at 31 March 2013 and 30 September 2013

8,000,000


62,270







The exercise price and expiry date on the warrants outstanding as at 30 September 2013 are as follows:












Warrants


Exercise Price


Fair Value


Exercisable


Expiry Date


7,000,000


£0.05


£270


7,000,000

*

15 February 2015


1,000,000


£0.10


£ 62,000


1,000,000


29 May 2015












hese warrants vested immediately as the contract was terminated during the period ended 31 March 2013.

The fair value of the warrants issued during the period ended 31 March 2013, was estimated at £62,000 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk free interest rate                                                                                                                                                            1.08 %

Expected dividend yield                                                                                                                                                              nil

Expected volatility                                                                                                                                                                  100 %

Expected life                                                                                                                                                                          3 years

10. SHARE CAPITAL (continued)                                                                                                                                                  

Option pricing models require the input of subjective assumptions regarding the expected volatility. Volatility is difficult to ascertain given that the company is still in the development stage, therefore it has been set at 100%. Changes in assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value, and therefore, the use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model, as required by IFRS, may not provide a realistic measure of the fair value of the Company's warrants at the date of issue.

There were no warrants issued in the six month period ended 30 September 2013.

On 24 May 2013 the Directors, by Special Resolution, were authorised to implement, at a future date to be approved by the Board, the reorganisation of the Company's share capital as follows:

a)     the consolidation of the Company's share capital so that every 50 Ordinary shares of £0.001 in the issued share capital of the Company be consolidated into one Ordinary share of £0.05 (New Ordinary share).  Each New Ordinary share would have the same rights and would be subject to the same restrictions as an existing Ordinary share.

b)    following the consolidation in a) the sub division of each New Ordinary share into one Ordinary share of £0.001 and one Deferred share of £0.049.

c)     the rights and restrictions of the New Ordinary and Deferred shares are set out in the Articles of Association adopted.

11LOSS PER ORDINARY SHARE                                                                                                                                             

Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss attributable to equity holders of the Group by the weighted average number of Ordinary shares in issue during the period.


2013

Loss attributable to equity holders of the Group

£(133,819)



Weighted average number of Ordinary shares in issue

323,285,256

Basic loss per share

£ (0.00)

Diluted loss per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue to assume the conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares at the start of the period. The Group's dilutive potential ordinary shares arise from warrants. In respect of the warrants a calculation is performed to determine the number of shares that could have been acquired at fair value, based upon the monetary value of the subscription rights attached to the outstanding warrants. The number of shares calculated as above is compared with the number of shares that would have been issued assuming the exercise of the warrants.


2013

Loss attributable to equity holders of the Group

£(133,819)



Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue

323,285,256

Dilutive warrants

-

Weighted average number of ordinary shares used to determine diluted loss per share

323,285,256

Diluted loss per share

£ (0.00)

There were no potentially dilutive warrants as the exercise price exceeded the average market price of the Ordinary shares during the period. Any potentially dilutive Ordinary shares would have been anti-dilutive because the Group was loss-making.

12.EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING DATE                                                                                                                             

On 18 October 2013, Mercom announced that application was made for the admission to AIM of 200,000,000 new Ordinary Shares ("New Shares"). The New Shares were issued at 0.3p per OrdinaryShare to raise £600,000.  Admission of the New Shares is occurred on 24 October 2013. The New Shares ranked pari passu with the existing Ordinary Shares in the Company.

On 28 November 2013, Mercom, reached an out of court settlement with Nordic Petroleum ASA with regard to its dispute over the Farm-in Agreement relating to the Chard Oil Sands leases in Canada (note 6).Mercom agreed to pay CAD$275,000, together with the issue of 12,954,545 new Ordinary Shares in Mercom, to Nordic Petroleum ASA in full and final settlement of the dispute.

On 28 November 2013, in conjunction with an advisory agreement, Mercom paid a fee of CAD$50,000, to be satisfied by the issue of 5,600,000 new Ordinary Shares in Mercom at 0.5p per share.

13. ULTIMATE CONTROLLING PARTY                                                                                                                                      

In the opinion of the Directors there is no ultimate controlling party.


This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
ENDIR GGGRUPUPWGMB
distributed by