Fitch Ratings has assigned an 'A+(EXP)' rating to the following Energy Southeast, A Cooperative District (Energy Southeast) bonds.

Approximately $850.0 million energy supply revenue bonds, series 2023A-1, series 2023A-2, and series 2023A-3 (collectively, the series 2023A bonds).

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

Approximately $850 million Energy Supply Revenue Bonds 2023 Series A-1, Series A-2 and Series A-3 (collectively, the 2023 Series A bonds) will be issued. The series 2023 Series A-1 bonds will be issued with a fixed interest rate. The series 2023 Series A-2 and the Series 2023 A-3 bonds will both be issued with variable interest rates (SOFR Index Rate and SIFMA index rates, respectively). While the Series 2023 A bonds will be issued with a final maturity date of Aug. 1, 2053, the bonds will be subject to a mandatory tender (the mandatory purchase date), on July 1, 2030. Fitch's rating on the bonds only addresses the credit risk of the bonds up to and including the mandatory tender date.

The Series 2023A bonds are expected to price as early as March 10. The allocation of the Series A-1, Series A-2 and Series A-3 bonds will be determined at pricing.

Final ratings are contingent upon the receipt of final documents conforming to information already received and reviewed as well as the final pricing of the bonds.

RATING ACTIONS

Entity / Debt

Rating

Energy Southeast, A Cooperative District (AL)

Energy Southeast, A Cooperative District (AL) /Energy System Revenues/1 LT

LT

A+(EXP)

Expected Rating

Page

of 1

VIEW ADDITIONAL RATING DETAILS

SECURITY

The 2023A energy supply revenue bonds are secured by the trust estate pledged under the indenture, including revenues derived from the sale of electricity, payments received from the commodity swap provider, the interest rate swap provider (for the series 2023 A-2 and series A-3), and any payments due pursuant to the receivables purchase provisions in the prepaid energy sales agreement (energy purchase agreement).

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Counterparty Payment Obligations: The bond rating reflects the structured nature of the prepaid energy transaction and Fitch's analysis of the principal transactional counterparties, including:

Morgan Stanley Energy Structuring, LLC (MSES): 'energy supplier', 'receivables purchaser', and 'interest rate swap provider';

Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. (MSCG);

Morgan Stanley (A+/Stable): guarantor of MSES's and MSCG's payment obligations;

Alabama Municipal Electric Authority (AMEA; AA-/Stable): 'project participant';

Natixis, S.A. (Natixis; A+/Negative): 'commodity swap provider';

Other counterparties will include investment agreement provider for the debt service account. The investment agreement provider will be selected on the pricing date and is required to be rated at least that of Fitch's Long-Term Issuer Default Rating on Morgan Stanley.

Weak Link Counterparty: The rating on the bonds is driven by the credit quality of the weakest counterparty whose default risk is not otherwise mitigated. The rating on the bonds reflects the credit quality of Morgan Stanley, whose payment obligations, combined with other available funds on hand, is anticipated to be sufficient for both the full and timely payment of debt service, and the redemption price of the bonds. The rating of Morgan Stanley also acts as current constraint on the transaction's rating.

Additional Support from Morgan Stanley: Credit risk to project participant is mitigated through receivables purchase provisions in the Prepaid Agreement between Energy Southeast and MSES, requiring MSES (supported by the Morgan Stanley guarantee) to cover all non-payments by the participant, should they occur.

Custodial Agreements Mitigate Risk to Commodity Swap Providers: The commodity swap provider will be Natixis. A custodial agreement between MSES, Natixis and Regions Bank (custodian) insulates bondholders from the credit risk of the commodity swap provider.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:

Shifts in the rating or credit quality of Morgan Stanley and the rating or credit quality of the investment agreement provider above the current rating on the transaction would lead to positive rating action.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:

Unless otherwise mitigated, shifts in the rating or credit quality of Morgan Stanley or the rate or credit quality of the investment agreement provider below the current rating on the bonds would lead to negative rating action.

Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario

International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10111579.

CREDIT PROFILE

Energy Southeast is a capital improvement cooperative district of the State of Alabama that was created for the purpose of acquiring, managing and financing supplies of electricity for the sale to Alabama Municipal Electric Authority (AMEA) and its Member Municipalities and to other governmentally owned wholesale customers. AMEA is a joint-action agency incorporated in 1986 to provide its members with a dependable and economically priced power supply. AMEA's 11 members are located primarily in southeast and southern Alabama and collectively serve approximately 121,000 retail electric customers.

STRUCTURE DESIGNED FOR TIMELY PAYMENT

Energy Southeast will use the bond proceeds to prepay MSES for a specified approximately 30-year supply of electric energy. By virtue of the sales, hedging and investment agreements outlined below, the project is structured to ensure that monthly net payments to Energy Southeast are sufficient to pay scheduled debt service, regardless of changes in energy prices, the physical delivery of energy or the acceptance of delivered energy.

Since the 2023 Series A-2 and A-3 bonds will be issued with variable interest rates, Energy Southeast will enter into an interest rate swap with MSES (guaranteed by Morgan Stanley) in order to hedge its exposure to interest rate fluctuations. The interest rate swap terminates on the mandatory purchase date.

STRUCTURE PROVIDES FOR MANDATORY TENDER

The bonds are being issued as approximately 30-year amortizing debt with a mandatory tender date on July 1, 2030. Proceeds to fund the mandatory tender are expected to come from remarketing or refunding proceeds. If Energy Southeast does not enter into a bond purchase agreement, firm remarketing agreement, or similar agreement for the bonds before the last day of the reset period prior to the mandatory tender date, or if Energy Southeast enters into such an agreement, but the funding for the remarketing of the bonds is not delivered to the trust estate five business days before the mandatory tender date, a failed remarketing of the bonds will occur.

A failed remarketing will cause an early termination of the energy purchase agreement and the extraordinary redemption of the bonds. In this case, MSES (supported by the Morgan Stanley guarantee) will be required to make a termination payment to Energy Southeast. The termination payment together with other available funds (including the debt service account), are designed to be sufficient to pay off the bonds plus accrued interest, ultimately covering all principal, unamortized premiums and accrued interest through the redemption date (redemption price).

Fitch's rating on the bonds only addresses the credit risk to bondholders up to and including the mandatory tender date.

ENERGY SOUTHEAST SELLS ENERGY TO AMEA AT FIXED PRICE DURING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT PERIOD

Energy Southeast will sell all of the energy delivered by MSES to AMEA (the project participant) pursuant to the PSC. AMEA will in turn resell the electric energy it purchases under the PSC to its participating members under the AMEA PSCs.

In conjunction with the execution of the PSC between AMEA and Energy Southeast, AMEA will enter into a limited assignment agreement to assign a portion of its rights and obligations under a previously existing power purchase agreement (PPA) with Alabama Power Company to MSCG. The initial assigned PPA provides for the purchase and sale of electricity each month through Dec. 31, 2025 at a fixed price. AMEA may assign additional PPAs to MSCG upon the expiration or termination of the initial assigned PPA. It is anticipated that AMEA will assign additional PPAs to MSCG during the initial reset period (July 1, 2030).

If there is no assigned energy in place at any time for the full quantities of prepaid electric energy that MSES is required to deliver under the energy purchase agreement, MSES is required to deliver hourly quantities of electric energy (base energy) to Energy Southeast for resale to AMEA.

While electric energy will be purchased by AMEA at a fixed price, less a discount, during the initial assignment period, subsequent assignment periods and/or base energy will be delivered at variable rates (either the day-ahead average price for the month for assigned energy during a subsequent assignment period, or the day-ahead market price for base energy), less the monthly discount. While AMEA would be responsible for the payment of variable rate energy prices in the absence of a new fixed price PPA, bondholder risk to variable rate energy prices is mitigated through the commodity swap.

Payments to Energy Southeast by AMEA will represent an operating expense of AMEA's utility system.

COMMODITY SWAP HEDGES COUNTERPARTY RISK

To hedge the risk of changes electric prices, Energy Southeast will enter into a commodity swap agreement (front-end swap) with Natixis, exchanging a monthly index price for a fixed price that is sufficient, together with the payments for electricity, to cover Energy Southeast's debt service requirements. Natixis will also enter into a matching swap agreement with MSES (back-end swap), exchanging a fixed price for a monthly index price to further hedge its position. The commodity swap is expected to only be used to the extent electricity delivered through the prepay transaction is purchased at variable rates.

A custodial agreement amongst Natixis, MSES and Regions Bank insulates bondholders from the risk of nonpayment by Natixis. Regions Bank will hold the payment from MSES and will pay the swap provider only after Natixis has paid Energy Southeast under the front-end swap. In the event of nonpayment by the swap provider to Energy Southeast under the front-end swap, the custodian shall be authorized to remit payment received from MSES directly to Energy Southeast.

FAILURE TO ACCEPT OR DELIVER ENERGY

The failure by MSES to deliver electric energy, or Energy Southeast to accept electric energy, is not expected to jeopardize the transaction's performance. If MSES fails to deliver energy for any reason, it is required to pay Energy Southeast for the undelivered volumes at prices sufficient to allow Energy Southeast to meet its obligations, including debt service payments.

Alternatively, under the PSC, if Energy Southeast provides notice to MSES to remarket energy to other purchasers that it does not need, or does not accept delivered energy, MSES is required to remarket such energy. If the energy cannot be remarketed, MSES is required to purchase the energy for its own account. In either case, MSES's payments from the remarketing or purchasing of the energy will be based on index prices sufficient to preserve transactional cash flows.

AMEA'S CREDIT RISK MITIGATED BY PUT RECEIVABLES PURCHASE PROVISIONS

The energy purchase agreement will include put receivables purchase provisions, which mitigate risks to bondholders from non-payment by AMEA. The put receivables purchase provisions obligate the energy supplier to purchase receivables relating to non-payment by the project participant in amounts sufficient to cover the maximum scheduled debt service that Energy Southeast is required to make in any two consecutive months.

BONDS SUBJECT TO EXTRAORDINARY REDEMPTION

The bonds are subject to extraordinary redemption prior to maturity. Under certain circumstances (a designated seller default and buyer default) or events such as changes in laws resulting in nonperformance of the seller or buyer (designated non-default termination events), the bonds may be called prior to the stated maturity through the extraordinary redemption mechanism. In the case of an extraordinary redemption, MSES will be required to make an early termination payment, which together with available funds in the debt service account, is designed to be sufficient to pay the redemption price of the bonds.

Morgan Stanley's financial guarantee to secure MSES's obligations under the energy purchase agreement includes MSES's obligation to make a termination payment.

REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING

The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com

(C) 2023 Electronic News Publishing, source ENP Newswire