NoRTON GoLD FIELDS

LIMITED

ASX/MEDIA ANNOUNCEMENT

22 February 2013

Class Ruling received from the ATO

Norton Gold Fields Limited (ASX:NGF, the "Company'') advises that the Australian Taxation Office (''ATO") has published a Class Ruling (CR 2013112) regarding the special dividend and capitai proceeds arising from the sale of the Company's shares pursuant to the 2012 off-market take over by Jinyu (H.K.) lnternational Mining Company Limited.

The Class Ruling is attached to this announcement and is available on the ATO's website at www.ato.gov.au.

The tax consequences for a shareholder with respect to the special dividend and capitai proceeds may vary depending upon a shareholder's individuai circumstances.

Shareholders should consult their own tax adviser as to their potential tax consequences.

For further information please contact:

Leni Stanley 61 (O) 7 3221 6022

Richard Jones 61 (O) 8 9263 9724

Company Secretary

Norton Gold Fields Limited

Norton Gold Fields Umifed • 16 Altana Street. West Perth, Western Australia 6005, Australia ABN:23 112 287 797 Tel (08) 9263 9700• Fax (08) 9263 9777• www.nortongoldfields.com.au

Class Ruling

== mDIO: C_R_2_0_1_3_/1_2_

Page status: legally binding Page 1 of 1O

Class Ruling

Incarne tax: capitai gains tax: special dividend and capitai proceeds from sale of Norton Gold Fields Limited shares pursuant to off market takeover

Contents

LEGALLY BINDING SECTION:

Para

O This publication provides you with the following levelof protectlon:

This pubfication (excluding appendixes) is a public ruling for the purposes of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.

What this Ruling is about 1

Date of effect 8

Scheme 9

Ruling 35

NOT LEGALLY BINDING SECTION:

Appendix 1:

Explanat/on 39

Appendix2:

Detailed contents list 49

A public ruling is an expression of the Commissioner's opinion about the way in which a relevant provision applies, or would apply, to entities generally or to a class of entities in relation to a particular scheme or a class of schemes.

lf you rely on this ruling, the Commissionar must apply the law to you in the way set out in the ruling (unless the Commissionar is satisfied that the ruling is incorrect and disadvantages you, in which case the law may be applied to you in a way that is more favourable for you -provided the Commissionar is not prevented from doing so by a time limit imposed by the law). You will be protected from having to pay any underpaid tax, penalty or interest in

respect of the matters covered by this ruling if it turns out that it does not correctly state how the relevant provision applies to you.

What this Ruling is about

1. This Ruling sets out the Commissioner's opinion on the way in which the relevant provision(s) identified below apply to the defined class of entities, who take part in the scheme to which this Ruling relates.

Relevant provision(s)

2. The relevant provisions dealt with in the Ruling are:

Section 104-1O of the /ncome Tax Assessment

Act 1997 (ITAA 1997); and

Section 116-20 ofthe ITAA 1997.

Class of entlties

3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies is the shareholders in Norton Gold Fields Limited (NGF) who:

accepted the offer made by Jinyu (H.K.) lnternational Mining Company Limited to acquire their NGF shares, and

Class Ruling

CR 2013/12

Paga 2 of 1O Page status: legally blnding

received the Special Dividend, and

are Australian residents who hold their NGF shares on capitai account, or are non-residents subject to Australian Capitai Gains Tax (CGT), and

are not subject to the taxation of financial arrangement rules in Division 230 of the JTAA 1997 in relation to gains and losses on their NGF shares.

(Note - Division 230 will generally not apply to individuals, unless they have made an election for it to apply to them.)
In this Ruling, a shareholder belonging to this class of entities is referred to as a 'participating NGF shareholder'.
Qualifications

4. The Commissionar makes this Ruling based on the precise

Scheme identified in this Ruling.
5. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 9 to 34 of this Ruilng.
6. lf the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then:
• this Ruling has no binding effect on the Commissionar because the scheme entered into is not the scheme on which the Commissionar has ruled; and

this Ruling may be withdrawn or modified.

7. This work is copyright Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth.Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to:
Commonwealth Copyright Administration Copyright and Classification Policy Branch Attorney-General's Department
3-5 National Circuit
Barton ACT 2600
or posted at: http://www.ag.gov.aulcca

Class Ruling

CR 2013/12

Page status: legally blnding Page 3 of 10

Date of effect

8. This Ruling applies from 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013. The Ruling continues to apply after 30 June 2013 to alt entities within the specified class who entered into the specified scheme during the term of the Ruling. However, this Ruling will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of this Ruling (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10).

Scheme

9. The following description ofthe Scheme is based on information provided by the applicant and NGF. The following documents, or relevant parts of them form part of and are to be read with the description:

• Class Ruling application from PricewaterhouseCoopers dated 9 October 2012;

• Bidder's Statement dated 18 July 2012;

• Target Statement dated 18 July 2012;

• Bid lmplementation Deed dated 31 May 2012;

Bridging Term Loan Facility Agreement dated

28 May 2012; and

• further information provided by the applicant dated

17 December 2012.

NGF

10. NGF is an Australian resident company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. NGF is focused on the production, development and exploration of gold in Western Australia and Queensland.

11. As at 18 July 2012 the issued capitai of NGF consisted of

849,580,265 ordinary fully paid shares and 12,000,000 options to

subscribe for ordinary fully paid shares.

12. Prior to 3 Apri12012, NGF's shareholders comprised a mix of institutional and retail investors.

Zijin

13. Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd (Zijin) is a mining conglomerate based in China that is primarily engaged in gold production.

Class Ruling

CR 2013/12

Page4 of10 Page status: legally binding

14. Zijin was incorporated in 2000 as a joint stock limited company, and is listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and the Shanghai Stock Exchange.

15. Zijin, via its wholly-owned subsidiaries, owned approximately

16.98% of NGF shares prior to 3 April 2012.

Jinyu

16. Jinyu (H.K.) lnternational Mining Company Limited (Jinyu) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zijin and is incorporated in Hong Kong.

The Offer

17. On 3 April2012 NGF announced that it had received an unsolicited indicative takeover proposal from Zijin.

18. On 31 May 2012 NGF and Zijin jointly announced that they had signed a 'Bid lmplementation Deed', pursuant to which Zijin (through a wholly-owned subsidiary) would make an off market takeover offer of $0.25 cash per share forali NGF shares not then held by Zijin and its subsidiaries (the Offer).

19. The Offer was subsequently made by Jinyu, full details of which were contained in the Bidder's Statement dated 18 July 2012.

20. The Bidder's Statement and the Bid lmplementation Deed both provided that NGF was permitted to announce and declare a one-off special dividend.

21. The Offer was subject to a number of conditions. One

condition required that Jinyu and its related bodies corporate obtani at least 50.1% of ali NGF shares at the conclusion of the Offer period.

22. The Offer triggered a 'change of contro!' provision in NGF's existing secured debt facility (secured note facility) which required NGF to repay the entire secured note facility (including a 5% redemption premium).

23. To repay the secured note facility NGF drew down existing

cash reserves and Jinyu provided NGF with a $38 million unsecured loan facility. The sole purpose of this loan facility as set aut in the Bridging Term Loan Facility Agreement was to partially fund repayment of the existing secured note facility.

24. The Offer closed an 20 August 2012, resulting in the Zijin group (via its wholly owned subsidiaries) holding an ownership interest of approximately 89.15% in NGF (including a 16.98% interest held before the Offer).

Class Ruling

CR 2013/12

Page status: legally binding Page 5 of 10

The SpecialDivldend

25. On 31 May 2012 NGF announced that NGF shareholders at the Special Dividend Record Date would be entitled to receive an unfranked specialdividend of $0.02 per share (the Special Dividend) which NGF proposed to declare and pay, with no reduction in the

$0.25 per share offer price. The Special Dividend would be:

declared and announced once the Offer became unconditional and ali of the loan notes under NGF's existing secured note facility had been redeemed; and

paid to shareholders not later than 3 weeks after the date on which the last of the events above occurred.

26. The Special Dividend was a means for NGF to distribute profits resulting from NGF's strong performance and profitability which had accrued to its shareholders in the 2011/2012 financial year.

27. In the absence of, and prior to, the Offer, NGF was restricted from paying dividends to shareholders by covenants imposed under the existing secured note facility. The requirement for Norton to repay its existing secured note facility as a result of the Zijin acquisition provided NGF with an opportunity to distribute earnings to shareholders.

28. On 2 August 2012 NGF announced that Jinyu had received acceptances for its off-market takeover offer such that the Zijin group had a relevant interest of 48.29% in NGF and had declared the Offer free of ali defeating conditions.

29. On 3 August 2012 NGF announced and declared the unfranked Special Dividend of $0.02 per share.

30. NGF shareholders, including the Zijin group,who held NGF shares on the Special Dividend Record Date of 15 August 2012, received the unfranked Special Dividend of $0.02 per NGF share on the Special Dividend Payment Date of 24 August 2012. The total Special Dividend amount paid to NGF shareholders was

$17,231,605.

31. The Special Dividend payment was funded from NGF's existing cash reserves.

32. The Special Dividend was debited entirely to NGF's 'Dividend paid (retained earnings)' account and NGF did not debit the Special Dividend to its share capitaiaccount.

33. The Special Dividend was not contracted or a mandatory condition of the Offer and was paid to ali eligible NGF shareholders regardless of whether they accepted or rejected the Offer.

34. The Special Dividend did not reduce the $0.25 cash proceeds paid under the Offer.

Class Ruling

CR 2013/12

Paga 6 of 10 Paga status: legally binding

Ruling

CGTeventA1

35. CGT event A1 happened when participating NGF shareholdars disposed of their NGF shares pursuant to the Scheme (subsections 104-1O(1) and 104-10(2) of the ITAA 1997).

36. A participating NGF shareholder made a capitai gain from CGT event A1 happening if the capitai proceeds from the disposal of a NGF share exceeded its cost base. A participating NGF shareholder made a capitalloss if those proceeds were less than the NGF share's reduced cost base (subsection 104-10(4) ofthe

ITAA 1997).

Capitai proceeds

37. The capitai proceeds received by a participating NGF shareholder was the money received or entitled to be received in respect of the event happening (subsection 116-20(1) of the ITAA 1997).

38. The capitai proceeds from the disposal of each NGF share pursuant to the Scheme was $0.25 cash per NGF share. This amount does not include the SpecialDividend of $0.02 cash per NGF share.

Commissioner of Taxatoi n

20 February 2013

Class Ruling

CR 2013/12

Page status: not legally binding Page 7 of 10

Appendix 1 - Explanation

O This Appendix is provided as information to help you understand how the Commlssioner's vlew has been reached. lt does not form part of the binding public ru/lng.

CGTeventA1

39. CGT event A1 happens if there is a change in the ownership of a CGT asset from one entity to another (section 104-1O of the ITAA 1997). This event happens when a contract for the disposal of

the asset is entered into, or if there is no contract, when the change of ownership occurs (subsection 104-10(3) ofthe ITAA 1997).

40. CGT event A1 happened when a participating NGF shareholder disposed of each of their NGF shares to Jinyu pursuant to the Scheme.

41. A participating NGF shareholder made a capitai gain when CGT event A1 happened if the capitai proceeds from the disposal of a NGF share exceeded its cast base. A participating NGF shareholder made a capitalloss if those capitai proceeds were less than the NGF share's reduced cast base (subsection 104-10(4) ofthe ITAA 1997).

Capitaiproceeds

42. The capitai proceeds from the Scheme was the money received or entitled to be received in respect of the disposal of shares in NGF by a participating NGF shareholder (subsection 116-20(1) of the ITAA 1997).

43. A participating NGF shareholder was entitled to receive $0.25 cash per NGF share in respect ofthe disposaloftheir NGF shares.

44. The term 'in respect of the event happening' in

subsection 116-20(1) ofthe ITAA 1997 requires that the relationship between the event and the receipt of the money,or entitlement to receive the money, must be more than coincidental. An amount is not

'capitai proceeds' from an event merely because it is received in association with the event.

Class Ruling

CR 2013/12

Page 8 of 10 Page status: not legally blnding

45. A dividend declared by a company that is subject to a takeover can form part of the vender shareholders' capitai proceeds from the disposal ofthe shares. Taxation Ruling TR 2010/4/ncome fax: capita/ gains: when a dividend wi/1 be included in the capitai proceeds from a disposa/ of shares that happens under a contraci or a scheme of arrangement states at paragraph 9 that:

9. A dividend declared or paid by the target company to the vender shareholder will be money or property that the vender shareholder has received, or is entitled to receive, under the contract or the scheme of arrangement, in respect of the transfer of the shares if the vender shareholder has bargained for the receipt of the dividend (whether or not in addition to other consideration) in return for giving up the shares. That is to say, if the dividend forms the

whole or part of that sum of money or property in retum for which the

vender shareholder is willing, and under the contract has promised or under the scheme of arrangement is bound, to transfer the shares in the target company, it will be capitai proceeds in respect of the CGT event A1 happening.

46. In this case, the payment of the Special Dividend occurred independently ofthe Scheme. This was primarily reflected in the following attributes:

the cash offer of $0.25 per NGF share was not reduced by the amount of the Special Dividend;

the $0.02 Special Dividend was not contracted or a mandatory condition of the Offer;

the Special Dividend was paid to ali eligible NGF shareholders regardless of whether they accepted or rejected the Offer; and

the SpecialDividend was funded from existing cash reserves and not by funds provided by Jinyu or Zijin.

47. TR 2010/4 states at paragraph 23 that:

A dividend declared and paid independently of the contract for the sale of shares is not capitai proceeds from the disposalof shares in respect of CGT event A1 happening merely because payment of the dividend:

is contingent on the sale proceeding; or

contemporaneous with the disposal of the shares under the contract.

48. Although the declaration and payment of the Special Dividend of $0.02 cash per NGF share was contingent on the Scheme proceeding, it is considered that the Special Dividend did not form part of the capitai proceeds received or entitled to be received by a participating NGF shareholder in respect of the disposal of NGF shares.

Class Ruling

CR 2013/12

Page status: not legally bindlng Page 9 of 10

Appendix 2 - Detailed contents list


49. The following is a detailed contents list for this Ruling: Paragraph

What thls Ruling is about 1

Relevant provision(s) 2
Class of entities 3
Qualifications 4

Date of effect 8

Scheme 9

NGF 10
Zijin 13
Jinyu 16
The Offer 17
The Special Dividend 25

Ruling 35

Appendix 1- Explanation 39

CGTeventA1 39
Capitai proceeds 42

Appendix 2 - Detailed contents list 49

Class Ruling

CR 2013/12

Page 10 of 10 Page status: not legally binding

References

Previous draft:

Not previously issued as a draft

Related Rulings/Determinations:

TR 2006/1O; TR 2010/4

Subject references:

- arrangement

- CGT assets

- CGT capitaiproceeds

- distributions

- dividend income

- takeovers & mergers

Legislative references:

- ITAA 1997

ITAA 1997 104-10

ITAA 1997 104-10(1)

ITAA 1997 104-10(2)

ITAA 1997 104-10(3)

ITAA 1997 104-10(4)

ITAA 1997 116-20(1)

TAA 1953

Copyright Act 1968

- ordinary shares

ATO references

NO: ISSN: ATOiaw topic:

1-4BEQ7FL

1445-2014

Incarne Tax --Capitai Gains Tax --capitai proceeds

distributed by