The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated unaudited
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. This
discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties
and assumptions. See "Forward-Looking Statements." Our actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.




Overview



Our principal operations include the development, acquisition, licensing and
enforcement of intellectual property rights that are either owned or controlled
by us or one of our wholly owned subsidiaries. We currently own, control or
manage eighteen intellectual property portfolios, which principally consist of
patent rights. As part of our intellectual property asset management activities
and in the ordinary course of our business, it has been necessary for either us
or the intellectual property owner who we represent to initiate, and it is
likely to continue to be necessary to initiate patent infringement lawsuits and
engage in patent infringement litigation. We anticipate that our primary source
of revenue will come from the grant of licenses to use our intellectual
property, including licenses granted as part of the settlement of patent
infringement lawsuits.



Our business, like all businesses at the present time, are affected by the
COVID-19 pandemic and the steps taken by states to seek to reduce the spread of
the virus. Although we do not manufacture or sell products, the COVID-19
pandemic and the work shutdown imposed in the United States and other countries
to limit the spread of the virus can have a negative impact on our business. Our
revenue is generated almost exclusively from license fees generated from
litigation seeking damages for infringement of our intellectual property rights.
The work shutdown has affected the court system, with courts operating on a
reduced schedule. As a result, patent infringement actions are likely to be
lower priority items in allocation of court resources, with the effect that
deadlines are likely to be postponed which delays may give defendants an
incentive to delay negotiations or offer a lower amount than they might
otherwise accept. These delays continue to have an effect on the court system as
a result of the backlog that developed as a result of court closures. In
addition, the effect of the COVID-19 and the public response may adversely
affect the financial condition and prospects of defendants and potential
defendants, which would make it less likely that they would be willing to settle
our claim. A number of defendants and potential defendants have filed to take
advantage of the Bankruptcy Act or have announced that they may consider such
action. If any defendant filed for protection under the Bankruptcy Act, the
action would be stayed and we may not be able to obtain a judgment or recover on
any judgment.



The COVID-19 pandemic and the response to limit the spread of the infection may
affect the financial condition of financing sources and the willingness of
potential financing sources to provide funding for our litigation. In addition,
these factors may affect a law firms' ability and willingness to provide us with
legal services on a contingent or partial contingent. The possibility that a
defendant may seek protection under the Bankruptcy Act may make it less likely
that a financing source would finance the litigation or that a law firm would
work on a contingency or modified contingency basis. Further, as the population
of the United States becomes vaccinated and restrictions that had been imposed
to address the pandemic are lifted, we cannot assure you that our revenue will
increase as a result of the reduction of such restrictions, including courts
being open for longer hours and for in person hearings.



Further, to the extent that holders of intellectual property rights see these
factors impacting our ability to generate revenue from their intellectual
property, they may be reluctant to sell intellectual property to us on terms
which are acceptable to us, if at all.



We seek to generate revenue from patent licensing fees relating to our
intellectual property portfolio, which includes fees from the licensing of our
intellectual property, primarily from litigation relating to enforcement of our
intellectual property rights. All of the revenue for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2022 were from patent licensing fees, of which approximately
100% was paid to the patent seller, funding sources and legal counsel pursuant
to our agreements with patent sellers, funding sources and legal counsel. We did
not generate revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021.



Because of the nature of our business transactions to date, we recognize
revenues from licensing upon execution of a license agreement following
settlement of litigation and not over the life of the patent. Thus, we would
recognize revenue when we receive the license fee or settlement payment.
Although we intend to seek to develop portfolios of intellectual property rights
that provide us for a continuing stream of revenue, to date we have not been
successful in doing so, and we do not anticipate that we will be able to
generate any significant revenue from licenses that provide a continuing stream
of revenue. Thus, to the extent that we continue to generate cash from single
payment licenses, our revenue can, and is likely to, vary significantly from
quarter to quarter and year to year. Our gross profit from license fees reflects
any royalties which we pay in connection with our license.



                                       20





It is generally necessary to commence litigation in order to obtain a recovery
for past infringement of, or to license the use of, our intellectual property
rights. Intellectual property litigation is very expensive, with no certainty of
any recovery. To the extent possible we seek to engage counsel on a contingent
fee or partial contingent fee basis, which significantly reduces our litigation
cost, but which also reduces the value of the recovery to us. We do not have the
resources to enable us to fund the cost of litigation. To the extent that we
cannot fund litigation ourselves, we may enter into an agreement with a
third-party funding source. Our agreements with the funding sources typically
provide that the funding source pays the litigation costs and that the funding
source receives a percentage of the recovery, thus reducing our recovery in
connection with any settlement of the litigation. In view of our limited cash
and our working capital deficiency, we are not able to institute any
monetization program that may require litigation unless we engage counsel on a
fully contingent basis or we obtain funding from third party funding sources. In
these cases, counsel may be afforded a greater participation in the recovery and
the third party that funds the litigation would be entitled to participate in
any recovery. To the extent that we have agreements with counsel and/or
litigation funding sources pursuant to which payments made to them represent a
portion of the gross recovery, and such payment is contingent upon a recovery,
our revenue from litigation reflects the gross recovery from litigation as
licensing fees, and payments to counsel and/or litigation funding sources are
reflected as cost of revenue.



Because we were in default under our loans to Intelligent Partners (as successor
to United Wireless), with Intelligent Partners having the ability to declare a
default on our notes in the principal amount of $4,672,810, and with the
possibility of our seeking protection under the Bankruptcy Act, we ceased our
monetization activities, since no counsel would represent us on a contingent
basis and no potential funding source would provide us with funding in view of
the default and possible bankruptcy, and we devoted our efforts in negotiating
the agreements with QFL and Intelligent Partners. We resumed our monetization
activities in February 2021 after we entered into our agreements with QFL and
Intelligent Partners. However, the intellectual property monetization cycle is
lengthy and may ultimately be unsuccessful. Accordingly, we did not generate
revenues during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021.



Agreements with QFL and Intelligent Partners

On February 22, 2021, we entered into a funding agreement with QFL and a restructure agreement with Intelligent Partners.





Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement with QFL, QFL agreed to make available to us
a financing facility of: (a) up to $25,000,000 for the acquisition of mutually
agreed patent rights that we intend to monetize, of which $2,210,000 has been
advanced as of March 31, 2022; (b) up to $2,000,000 for operating expenses, of
which the we have requested and received $1,200,000 as of March 31, 2022; and
(iii) $1,750,000 to fund the cash payment portion of the restructure of our
obligations to Intelligent Partners. In return we transferred to QFL a right to
receive a portion of net proceeds generated from the monetization of those
patents. We used $1,750,000 of proceeds from the QFL financing as the cash
payment portion of the restructure of our obligations to Intelligent Partners.
Our obligations to QFL are secured by the proceeds from the patents acquired
with their funding, the patents and all general intangibles now or hereafter
arising from or related to the foregoing and the proceeds and products of the
foregoing. We also granted QFL a ten-year warrant to purchase a total of up to
962,463 shares of our common stock, with an exercise price of $0.54 per share
which may be exercised through February 18, 2031 on a cash or cashless basis,
subject to certain limitations on exercisability. The warrant also contains
certain minimum ownership percentage antidilution rights pursuant to which the
aggregate number of shares of common stock purchasable upon the initial exercise
of the Warrant shall not be less than 10% of the aggregate number of outstanding
shares of our capital stock (determined on a fully diluted basis). A portion of
any gain from sale of the shares, net of taxes and costs of exercise, realized
prior to the completion of all monetization activities shall be credited against
the total return due to QFL pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. We also agreed
to take all commercially reasonable steps necessary to regain compliance with
the OTCQB eligibility standards as soon as practicable, but in no event later
than 12 months from the closing date, and regained compliance on May 7, 2021 and
we granted QFL registration rights with respect to the common stock issuable
upon exercise of the warrants. We also granted QFL certain board observation
rights. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, all of the net proceeds from the
monetization of the intellectual property acquired with funds from QFL are paid
directly to QFL. After QFL has received a negotiated rate of return, we and QFL
share net proceeds equally until QFL achieves its investment return, as defined
in the agreement. Thereafter, we retain 100% of all net proceeds. Except in an
Event of Default, as defined therein, all payments by us to QFL pursuant to the
Purchase Agreement are non-recourse and shall be paid only if and after net
proceeds from monetization of the patent rights owned or acquire by us are
received, or to be received.



Contemporaneously with the execution of the agreement with QFL, we entered into
a restructure agreement with Intelligent Partners to eliminate any obligations
we had with respect to the outstanding notes and the securities purchase
agreement. As part of the restructure of our agreements with Intelligent
Partners, we amended the existing MPAs and granted Intelligent Partners certain
rights in the monetization proceeds from any new intellectual property we
acquire. Under these MPAs, Intelligent Partners receives a 60% interest in the
proceeds from our intellectual property owned by the eight Subsidiary
Guarantors. Intelligent Partners also participates in the monetization proceeds
from new intellectual property that we acquire until the total payments under
all the monetization participation agreements equal $2,805,000, as follows: for
net proceeds between $0 and $1,000,000, Intelligent Partners receives 10% of the
net proceeds realized from new patents, except that if, in any calendar quarter,
net proceeds realized by us exceed $1,000,000, Intelligent Partners' entitlement
for that quarter only shall increase to 30% on the portion of net proceeds in
excess of $1,000,000 but less than $3,000,000. If in the same calendar quarter,
net proceeds exceed $3,000,000, Intelligent Partners' entitlement for that
quarter only shall increase to 50% on the portion of net proceeds in excess of
$3,000,000. The payments with respect to the new patents terminate once total
payments to Intelligent Partners under all monetization participation agreements
reach $2,805,000. The payments to Intellectual Partners with respect new patents
are payable from the proceeds which are allocated to us under the QFL
agreements, which start after QFL has received a negotiated rate of return.




                                       21




Effects of Possible Delisting of Common Stock on OTCQB





On May 23, 2022, we received notice from OTC Markets Group, that, because the
bid price for our common stock had closed below $0.01 per share for more than 30
consecutive days, we no longer met the Standards for Continued Eligibility under
the OTC listing standards and, if this deficiency is not met by August 21, 2022,
our stock would be removed from the OTCQB marketplace, in which event our common
stock will be traded on the OTC Pink market. Our registration rights agreement
with QFL provides that, in the event of a failure to comply with certain
covenants, which includes the failure of our common stock to be traded on the
OTCQB, in addition to any other remedies available to QFL, we are to pay to QFL
an amount in cash equal to 2.0% of the aggregate value of QFL's Registrable
Securities, as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement, whether or not
included in such registration statement, on each of the following dates: (i) the
initial day of a maintenance failure; (ii) on the 30th day after the date of
such a failure and (iii) every 30th day thereafter (prorated for periods
totaling less than thirty (30) days) until such failure is cured. In July 2022,
we amended our certificate of incorporation to effect a one-for-100 reverse
split of our common stock We subsequently received advice from OTC Markets Group
that the deficiency had been cured. We had previously received a similar notice,
and our common stock taken off the OTCQB effective August 31, 2020, and it
traded on the OTC Pink Market until May 7, 2021 when trading resumed on the
OTCQB. We cannot assure you that we will continue to meet the requirements for
continued listing on the OTCQB, including the maintenance of a bid price of

at
least $0.01 per share.



Portfolios



In August 2021, STX brought a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District for
the Eastern District of Texas against Yamaha Corporation and Steinberg Media
Technologies GMBH. In March 2022, STX brought a patent infringement suit in the
U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Parrot SA, Delair SAS,
Drone Volt, SA, EHang Holdings Limited and Flyability SA. As of September 30,
2022, the matter against Yamaha Corporation, Steinberg Media Technologies GMBH,
Parrot SA, Drone Volt, SA, and Flyability SA have been resolved, and revenue for
the nine months ended September 30, 2022 includes revenue from the settlement.



In September 2021, M-RED Inc. brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Biostar Microtech International Corp. and Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd. As of September 30, 2022, those matters have been resolved, and revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 includes revenue from those settlements.





In November 2021, TLL brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for
the Eastern District of Texas against Trend Micro Incorporated. In March 2022,
Trend Micro, Inc. filed a complaint against TLL in the U.S. District for the
Western District of Texas seeking declaratory judgement of non-infringement of
the patents in suit. In February 2022, TLL brought patent infringement suits in
the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Checkpoint Software
Technologies Ltd. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. In March 2022, TLL voluntarily
dismissed, without prejudice, the action against Palo Alto Networks, Inc. In
March 2022, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. filed a complaint against TLL and the
Company in the U.S. District for the Southern District of New York seeking
declaratory judgement of non-infringement of the patents in suit. In May 2022,
Trend Micro Inc. filed a motion with the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
seeking to have the pending actions consolidated into a centralized
multidistrict litigation for pretrial proceedings. In August 2022, the Judicial
Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated all actions in the U.S. District
for the Eastern District of Texas. In October 2022, TLL brought patent
infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas
against Fortinet, inc., Crowdstrike, Inc. et.al., and Musarubra US, LLC.



In March 2022, LSC brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for
the Eastern District of Texas against Microsoft Corporation, Google LLC, Cisco
Systems, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. et.al. In November 2022, Google LLC filed a
petition before the patent trial and appeal board for inter partes review of US
Patent No. 10,154,092.



On January 27, 2022, the Company acquired, via assignment from Intellectual
Ventures Assets 181 LLC and Intellectual Ventures Assets 174 LLC, all right
title and interest to four patent portfolios consisting of fifteen United States
patents and three foreign patents for a purchase price of $1,060,000. The
Company requested and received a capital advance in the amount of the $1,060,000
purchase price from the facility with QFL. The patents were assigned to our
wholly owned subsidiaries Tyche Licensing LLC and Deepwell IP LLC. In May 2022,
Tyche brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern
District of Texas against MediaTek Inc., Realtek Semiconductor Corporation,
Texas Instruments Incorporated, Infineon Technologies AG and STMicroelectronics
NV et. al. In May 2022, Tyche voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice, the
action against STMicroelectronics NV et .al. In May 2022, STMicroelectronics,
Inc. filed an action for declaratory judgement of non-infringement in the U.S.
District for the Northern District of Texas, the action was dismissed without
prejudice in July 2022. In September 2022, the action against Texas Instruments
Incorporated was dismissed with prejudice.



                                       22




In June 2022, MML and AI agreed to amend the Purchase Agreement to add two additional patent families for an additional $92,000. We requested and received a capital advance from QFL in the amount of $92,000, which we used to make payment to AI in August 2022 pursuant to the amendment to the Purchase Agreement.





In July 2022, EDI acquired, via assignment from Edward D. Ioli Trust, all right
title and interest to a portfolio of five United States patents relating to a
system and method for controlling vehicles and for providing assistance to
operated vehicles ("EDI Portfolio") for a purchase price consisting of 50% of
the net proceeds resulting from monetization of the EDI Portfolio.



In July 2022, we entered into a purchase agreement with Hewlett Packard
Enterprise Development LP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company for the
purchase of eight United States Patents for a purchase price of $350,000. We
paid $35,000 upon execution of the agreement with the balance payable within 30
days. We requested and received a capital advance from QFL in the amount of
$350,000, which was used to make payment of the balance in August 2022 pursuant
to the terms of the purchase agreement.



Results of Operations


Three and nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021





                                             For the Three Months Ended          For the Nine Months Ended
                                                    September 30,                      September 30,
                                               2022               2021             2022              2021

Revenues (patent licensing fees)           $     275,000       $         -     $     397,000     $          -
Cost of revenue (litigation and
licensing expenses)                              147,393             5,825           237,487           70,063
Selling, general and administrative
expenses                                         476,812           363,402         1,561,987        3,482,360
Loss from operations                            (349,205 )        (369,227 )      (1,402,474 )     (3,552,423 )

Other income (expense)

Gain on settlement of accounts payable                 -         1,725,965                 -        1,763,573
Warrant expense                                        -                 -                 -       (1,154,905 )
Change in fair market value of warrant
liability                                        565,928          (394,610 )       1,432,145         (779,645 )
Loss on conversion of debt                             -                 -                 -         (305,556 )
Loss on debt extinguishment                            -                 -                 -         (730,378 )
Interest expense                                (113,058 )         (90,509 )        (295,705 )       (216,667 )
Total other income (expense)                     452,870         1,240,846 

1,136,440 (1,423,578 )


Income (loss) before income tax                  103,665           871,619 

        (266,034 )     (4,976,001 )

Income tax expense                                     -                 -           (12,884 )         (1,806 )

Net income (loss)                          $     103,665       $   871,619     $    (278,918 )   $ (4,977,807 )
We generated revenues of approximately $275,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2022 and approximately $397,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2022, as compared to no revenues for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2021. Our revenue for the nine months ended September 30,
2022 was generated from settlements in the M-RED and STX portfolios. The failure
to generate revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 resulted from
our inability to engage counsel or secure financing for licensing programs on
our intellectual property as a result of our default under the notes to
Intelligent Partners. Our revenue, in the near future if not longer, is likely
to be affected by factors relating to the COVID-19 pandemic as described under
"Overview." The total settlement recovery is included in revenue and the
associated costs are deducted as cost of revenue. Cost of revenue for the three
months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 relating to patent service costs was
approximately $147,000 and $6,000, respectively. Cost of revenue for the nine
months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 was approximately $237,000 and $70,000,
respectively. As discussed above, the timing and amount of our revenue is
dependent upon the results of litigation seeking to enforce our intellectual
property rights, and we cannot predict when or whether we will have a recovery
and how much of the recovery will be received by us after payments to legal
counsel, to our funding sources, to inventors/former patent owners and to
Intelligent Partners who have an interest in our share of the recovery from
certain patent portfolios after deducting payments due to counsel and the
litigation funding source.



                                       23





Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2022 increased by approximately $113,000, or approximately 31%,
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2021. Selling, general, and
administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 decreased
by approximately $1,920,000, or approximately 55%, compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2021. Our principal expenses for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2022 was amortization of intangible assets of approximately
$198,000 and $712,000 and professional fees of $142,000 and $430,000,
respectively. We had stock-based compensation costs of approximately $25,000 and
$92,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022, respectively.
Our principal expense for the three months ended September 30, 2021 was
amortization expense of approximately $388,000 and was stock-based compensation
expense of approximately $1,805,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2021. As discussed above, the timing and amount of revenue is dependent upon the
results of litigation seeking to enforce our intellectual property rights.
Depending on the terms of the engagement with counsel, total fees payable across
all our portfolio enforcement actions may exceed total settlement recoveries as
of a specific date as the settlements do not occur simultaneously.



Other income and expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022
included a gain on change in fair value of warrant liability of approximately
$566,000 and approximately $1,432,000, respectively. We realized a loss on
change in fair value of warrant liability of approximately $395,000 for the
three months ended September 30, 2021 and approximately $780,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2021. The fair value of the warrant liability is
affected by the price of our common stock, so it increases as the stock price
goes up and decreases as the stock price goes down. Other expense also reflects
interest expense of approximately $113,000 and $296,000 for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2022, respectively and approximately $91,000 and
$217,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, respectively.
The increase in interest expense reflects the accrued interest payable on the
principal amount of QFL facility. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2021, we realized a gain on settlement of accounts payable of
approximately $1,726,000 and approximately $1,764,000, respectively.



We did not incur income tax expense for the three months ended September 30,
2022 and 2021. We incurred income tax expense of $13,000 and $2,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase in income
tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 primarily reflects
foreign income taxes related to foreign source patent licensing fees.



As a result of the foregoing, we realized a net income of approximately
$104,000, or $0.02 per share (basic and diluted) and net loss of approximately
$279,000, or $0.05 per share (basic and diluted), for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2022, respectively, compared to net income of approximately
$872,000, or $0.16 per share (basic) and $0.13 per share (diluted), and net loss
of approximately $4,978,000, or $0.99 per share (basic and diluted) for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, respectively.



Liquidity and Capital Resources


At September 30, 2022, we had current assets of approximately $305,000, and
current liabilities of approximately $9,410,000. Our current liabilities include
funding liabilities of approximately $5,284,000 payable to QFL, a non-interest
bearing total monetization proceeds obligation (the "TMPO") to Intelligent
Partners in the amount of $2,801,000 under the Restructure Agreement, both of
which are only payable from money generated from the monetization of
intellectual property, and loans payable of $138,000 and accrued interest of
approximately $788,000. As of September 30, 2022, we have an accumulated deficit
of approximately $25,715,000 and a negative working capital of approximately
$9,105,000. Other than salary and pension benefits to our chief executive
officer, we do not contemplate any other material operating expense requiring
cash in the near future other than normal general and administrative expenses,
including expenses relating to our status as a public company filing reports
with the SEC.


The following table shows the summary cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021:

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses