only24 November 2021
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : UPDATE ON ESG TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
Vanadium Resources Limited (ASX: VR8) provides the following additional information in relation to the Company Annoucement releaed 16 November 2021, titled 'Update on ESG Technology Development', following consultation with the ASX.
useThe aim of the metallurgical testwork program is to confirm parameters for the techncological development of a two-stage process for extraction of Vanadium, Iron and other value metals using concentrates produced and obtained from the Steelpoortdrift Project in South Africa or other sources if applicable. Current development of the Steelpoortdrift project will continue on the basis of the Salt Roast process as reported previously (ASX
INITIAL METALLURGICAL TEST WORK RESULTS
personalannouncement 22 June 2021: Steelpoortdrift PFS delivers superior results) whilst the ESG techncology is being developed separately.
Stage 1
The first stage of the process involves selective extraction and separation of Iron and Vanadium. The second stage of the process involves extraction of other value metals, including Titanium and Aluminium, and to maximize the extraction of Iron and Vanadium.
The elements of interest in the feed material; VR8/CONC2/19/04/2021 sample 776920, are presented in Table 1.
Fe % | V2O5 % | TiO2 % | Al2O3 % |
53,9 | 1,97 | 11,1 | 4,72 |
Table 1 Concentrate Composition.
A series of tests were conducted over a range of temperature and reductant concentration conditions for the | |||||
first and second stage of the process to empirically derive the optimal parameters. | |||||
For | |||||
Near optimal Stage 1 extraction parameters were attained in test FS-5B, with % metals extracted presented in | |||||
table 2. | |||||
Fe | V2O5 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | ||
95,9 % | 95,6 % | 4,10 % | 13,4 % | ||
Table 2 Stage 1 Metals Extraction.
This indicates high selectivity for Iron (95.9% extraction) and Vanadium (95.6% extraction) and rejection of Titanium (only 4.1% extraction).
Vanadium Resources Limited (ASX.VR8) | |
Suite 7, 63 Shepperton Road, Victoria Park, WA 6101 Australia | Page 1 of 10 |
+61-8 6158 9990 • contact@VR8.global • www.VR8.global |
onlyThe rejected Titanium material is then fed into Stage 2 of the process.
Stage 2
Residues from the Stage 1 process were processed at the near optimal Stage 2 extraction parameters selected from the results obtained from Stage 1 in test BL-A, with % metals extracted presented in table 3. Variable temperatures were not tested during this test.
use
Fe | V2O5 | TiO2 | Al2O3 |
91,0 % | 99,3 % | 97,8 % | 40,0 % |
Table 3 Stage 2 Metals Extraction.
This demonstrates that high extraction yields for Titanium (97.8%) can be achieved. Additionally, the Stage 2 personalprocess is able to recover the remaining Iron and Vanadium; as well as Aluminium (40% extracted).
The overall extraction yields for the combined Stage 1 and Stage 2 processes are above 99% for Iron, Vanadium and Titanium.
For
Page 2 of 10
onlyJORC Tables
The concentrates tested were produced during the previous pilot test campaign reported (ASX announcement 24 and 25 June 2020: Testwork enhances concentrate from Steelpoortdrift) with the relevant JORC tables included in appendix below.
useAPPENDIX A.
The following Tables are provided to ensure compliance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition) requirements for the reporting of Exploration Results at the Steelpoortdrift Vanadium Project.
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section applies to all succeeding sections)
Criteria personalSampling techniques
ForDrilling techniques
Drill sample recovery
JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, | Metallurgical samples made up by compositing | |||
random chips, or specific specialised industry | excess sample material ("bulk rejects") from diamond | |||
standard measurement tools appropriate to the | core drilling (NQ size) and RC drilling using 5 ¼" face | |||
minerals under investigation, such as down hole | sampling hammer. | |||
gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). | ||||
These examples should not be taken as limiting the | ||||
broad meaning of sampling. | ||||
Include reference to measures taken to ensure | RC & DD drilling sampled at 1m intervals | |||
sample representivity and the appropriate calibration | RC drilling split on site using a riffle splitter. | |||
of any measurement tools or systems used. | DD drilling split at core shed used a core saw. | |||
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that | All aspects of the determination of mineralisation are | |||
are Material to the Public Report. In cases where | described in this table. | |||
'industry standard' work has been done this would be | Drilling using these methods is considered | |||
relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was | appropriate for sampling the vanadiferous | |||
used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was | titanomagnetite unit which hosts the mineralisation. | |||
pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In | All of the drill samples have been sent to a | |||
other cases more explanation may be required, such | commercial laboratory for crushing, pulverising and | |||
as where there is coarse gold that has inherent | chemical analysis by industry standard practises. | |||
sampling problems. Unusual commodities or | Metallurgical testwork has followed standard | |||
mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may | techniques for extraction of magnetite using a | |||
warrant disclosure of detailed information. | magnetic separation process. | |||
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole | RC drilling uses face sampling hammer and 5 ¼" bit | |||
hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic etc) | sizes. | |||
and details (e.g. core diameter, triple of standard | DD drilling used NQ sized core | |||
tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or | ||||
other type, whether core is orientated and if so, by | ||||
what method, etc). | ||||
Method of recording and assessing core and chip | RC drill samples are weighed to give a quantitative | |||
sample recoveries and results assessed. | basis to estimation of recovery. | |||
Diamond core is measured to quantify core recovery | ||||
each run. | ||||
Page 3 of 10
For personal use only
Criteria
Logging
Sub-sampling
techniques and sample preparation
JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and | RC drilling - consistent drilling technique, cleaning of | |||
ensure representative nature of the samples. | cyclone. | |||
Diamond drilling -consistent drilling technique. | ||||
Whether a relationship exists between sample | No relationship observed between recovery and | |||
recovery and grade and whether sample bias may | grade. | |||
have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of | There is no known or reported relationship in | |||
fine/coarse material. | historical drilling between sample recovery and | |||
grade. | ||||
Whether core and chip samples have been | RC drill chips & drill core is being geologically logged | |||
geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of | for the total length of the hole. Logging is recording | |||
detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource | lithology, mineralogy, alteration, veining, structure, | |||
estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. | mineralisation and weathering. Logs are coded using | |||
the company geological coding legend and entered | ||||
into Excel worksheets prior to being loaded into the | ||||
company database. All core is being photographed | ||||
with images to be stored on the company server. | ||||
Logging is appropriate and sufficiently detailed to | ||||
support Mineral Resource estimates. | ||||
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in | Logging of chips and core is both qualitative (eg. | |||
nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. | colour) and quantitative (eg. minerals percentages). | |||
The total length and percentage of the relevant | 100% of all drilling to date by the Company has been | |||
intersections logged. | logged. | |||
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, | Sampling for all diamond core samples is undertaken | |||
half or all core taken. | on split core, halved via a core saw. | |||
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary | RC drilling is sampled dry and split through a riffle | |||
split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. | splitter. | |||
Following laboratory preparation , the excess crushed | ||||
sample is returned to the Company. The sample is | ||||
composited on a hole by hole basis according to the | ||||
stratigraphic unit of the mineralised zone (Upper, | ||||
Intermediate and Lower). Samples from the same | ||||
stratigraphic zone are combined and submitted for | ||||
the metallurgical testwork | ||||
For all sample types, the nature, quality and | The sampling techniques are of consistent quality and | |||
appropriateness of the sample preparation | appropriate. | |||
technique. | ||||
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- | To ensure representivity sampling followed the same | |||
sampling stages to maximise representivity of | methodology at all times (both for assay and for | |||
samples. | metallurgy). | |||
Field duplicates taken and inserted for the assay | ||||
samples. Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) were | ||||
selected to be similar in chemistry to the | ||||
mineralisation being targeted. | ||||
Page 4 of 10
For personal use only
Criteria
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests
JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||||||||
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is | One field duplicate is collected per 20 assay samples | ||||||||
representative of the in situ material collected, | in addition to laboratory duplicates which were also | ||||||||
including | for | instance | results | for | field | reported. | |||
duplicate/second-half sampling. | For the metallurgical samples samples were | ||||||||
combined based on stratigraphic units. Repeat assays | |||||||||
were carried out on the samples prior to magnetic | |||||||||
separation as well as afterwards. | |||||||||
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain | The material and sample sizes are considered | ||||||||
size of the material being sampled. | appropriate given the magnetite unit being sampled. | ||||||||
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the | The samples were sent to ALS Johannesburg, an ISO | ||||||||
assaying and laboratory procedures used and | accredited commercial laboratory, for preparation | ||||||||
whether the technique is considered partial or total. | and whole rock analysis. All samples were analysed | ||||||||
by XRF fusion for Al2O3, As, Ba, CaO, Cl, Co, Cr2O3, | |||||||||
Cu, Fe, K2O, MgO, Mn, Na2O, Ni, P, Pb, S, SiO2, Sn, Sr, | |||||||||
TiO2, V, Zn and Zr as well as loss on ignition. | |||||||||
Davis Tube analysis was carried out by SGS | |||||||||
Laboratories Johannesburg, an ISO accredited | |||||||||
commercial laboratory. Davis Tube analysis carried | |||||||||
out at magnetic field of 1000G with magnetic and | |||||||||
non-magnetic fractions analysed by XRF fusion for Fe, | |||||||||
TiO2, V2O5, P2O5, SiO2, Al2O3, CaO, Cr2O3, MgO, | |||||||||
MnO, Na2O, K2O and loss on ignition. | |||||||||
Metallurgical testwork utilised the large scale | |||||||||
magnetic separation units at Multotec's R&D | |||||||||
Division. The initial magnetic concentrate produced | |||||||||
in May 2019 was re-milled to 80% passing 106um, | |||||||||
then passed through varying magnetic fields as | |||||||||
detailed in Table 1 of the ASX Announcement dated | |||||||||
24 June 2020. LIMS utilised magnetic fields of 1550G | |||||||||
while HIMS utilised magnetic fields of 6500G. | |||||||||
Samples were analysed at SGS laboratories using the | |||||||||
same methods as for the Davis Tube samples. | |||||||||
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF | Hand held assay devices have not been reported. | ||||||||
instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining | |||||||||
the analysis including instrument make and model, | |||||||||
reading times, calibrations factors applied and their | |||||||||
derivation, etc. | |||||||||
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg | For assay samples QA/QC samples are inserted every | ||||||||
standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory | 10 samples. These alternate between a CRM & blank, | ||||||||
checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie | and a field duplicate (RC drilling only). | ||||||||
lack of bias) and precision have been established. | CRM are sourced from an accredited source and are | ||||||||
of similar material to the mineralisation being | |||||||||
sampled. | |||||||||
QA/QC samples are checked following receipt of each | |||||||||
assay batch to confirm acceptable accuracy and | |||||||||
precision. | |||||||||
Page 5 of 10
This is an excerpt of the original content. To continue reading it, access the original document here.
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Vanadium Resources Ltd. published this content on 24 November 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 24 November 2021 05:59:01 UTC.