Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
15.55 USD | +2.71% | -0.51% | -32.01% |
Summary
- Overall, the company has poor fundamentals for a medium to long-term investment strategy.
- The company has a good ESG score relative to its sector, according to Refinitiv.
Strengths
- The company's earnings per share (EPS) are expected to grow significantly over the next few years according to the consensus of analysts covering the stock.
- The stock, which is currently worth 2025 to 0.39 times its sales, is clearly overvalued in comparison with peers.
- The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.
- Given the positive cash flows generated by its business, the company's valuation level is an asset.
- The average target price set by analysts covering the stock is above current prices and offers a tremendous appreciation potential.
- Analyst opinion has improved significantly over the past four months.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- The company benefits from high valuations in earnings multiples.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- For the last four months, the sales outlook for the coming years has been revised downwards. No recovery of the group's activities is yet foreseen.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: IT Services & Consulting
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-32.01% | 2.78B | A | ||
-19.53% | 177B | A- | ||
-3.23% | 159B | B+ | ||
+2.05% | 153B | B- | ||
+5.13% | 100B | A- | ||
+9.84% | 81.11B | A- | ||
+22.85% | 75.87B | C- | ||
-8.81% | 69.81B | A | ||
-31.57% | 45.63B | C | ||
-9.69% | 42.96B | A- |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- DXC Stock
- Ratings DXC Technology Company