Log in
Forgot password ?
Become a member for free
Sign up
Sign up
Dynamic quotes 

4-Traders Homepage  >  Equities  >  Nyse  >  CBS Corporation    CBS

Mes dernières consult.
Most popular
News SummaryMost relevantAll newsofficial PublicationsSector newsTweets

CBS : Shari Redstone Hits Back at CBS -- WSJ

share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
05/17/2018 | 08:48am CEST

Move aims to block attempt to strip her family's voting power over media company

By Keach Hagey and Joe Flint 

This article is being republished as part of our daily reproduction of WSJ.com articles that also appeared in the U.S. print edition of The Wall Street Journal (May 17, 2018).

Shari Redstone fired back at CBS Corp., moving to block the media company's efforts to strip her family of voting control.

In a power move to protect its position as the media giant's controlling shareholder, the Redstones' family holding company dictated a significant change on Wednesday to the rules of how CBS's board operates. The adjustment would make it nearly impossible for the current directors to be able to water down the family's voting power.

The decree marks a significant escalation in the battle breaking out between Ms. Redstone and CBS Chief Executive Les Moonves in a long-running disagreement over the future of the media company and Ms. Redstone's desire to recombine CBS with Viacom Inc. The fight has been thrust into the courts as both sides attempt to outmaneuver the other and decide the fate of the television powerhouse.

CBS said in a lawsuit this week that it wants to prevent Ms. Redstone and her family's National Amusements Inc. holding company from overhauling CBS's board and forcing a merger with Viacom.

The Redstones and National Amusements responded Wednesday in a legal filing, saying they had no such intentions. They called CBS's attempts to issue new voting shares to reduce their nearly 80% voting control to 17% "egregiously overboard and unjustified." They also argue that CBS would have other options legally that wouldn't require diminishing the Redstones' voting interest, including challenging the removal of any director.

"This is an unprecedented usurpation of a controlling stockholder's voting power," National Amusements' lawyers wrote.

The documents filed by the Redstones were in opposition to the motion for a temporary restraining order that CBS's special committee of independent board members filed on Monday. The committee is seeking to block National Amusements from replacing board members or modifying the company's governance documents before CBS convenes a special meeting on Thursday to vote on diluting the Redstones' control.

In a Wednesday hearing in Delaware Chancery Court, the judge ordered an effective standstill to prevent both sides from making any more moves before he issues a decision on CBS's request for the temporary restraining order. The written decision was expected by Thursday before CBS's board meeting.

Judge Andre Bouchard ordered the short-term standstill in response to National Amusements' last-minute maneuvering before the hearing. "I have never seen anything quite like what transpired here," he said.

A half-hour before the start of the hearing, National Amusements announced a change to CBS's bylaws requiring a supermajority of board members to approve actions such as dividends and amendments to bylaws. The effort to dilute National Amusements' voting power is structured as a stock dividend, and as long as National Amusements is still the controlling shareholder, it has the power to change CBS's bylaws without signoff by the board.

The supermajority requires 90% of CBS's 14 board members to approve such a change, according to a person familiar with the matter. Because Ms. Redstone, who is vice chairman of CBS, would likely have the support of the two Redstone family lawyers also on the board, Rob Klieger and David Andelman, that would make CBS's proposed dilution of the Redstones' voting control unlikely to pass, the person said. Neither Mr. Klieger nor Mr. Andelman responded to a request for comment.

"The latest step by NAI provides further evidence of why we concluded that we had no choice but to file our action in the Delaware courts, in order to protect the interests of all CBS shareholders," CBS said in a statement in response to the bylaw change. "We continue to be confident in our position and look forward to presenting our case in court."

In court documents, National Amusements said that while it had no intention of overhauling CBS's management and board, CBS's latest actions "have forced NAI to consider exercising its rights."

Ms. Redstone has been urging CBS and Viacom, the two companies National Amusements controls, to consider a merger for the better part of two years. After dropping an effort in late 2016, she revived it at the start of the year.

According to the National Amusements' lawyers, the CBS and Viacom special committees considering the merger came to an economic agreement on the terms of the merger, and were simply held up over Ms. Redstone's desire that Viacom Chief Executive Bob Bakish get a board seat in the merged company -- a nonstarter for Mr. Moonves.

A CBS spokesman said, "There could not have been a deal on price in isolation from the other aspects of this transaction."

CBS said in court documents that its special committee came to the conclusion last weekend that a merger wasn't in the best interests of CBS shareholders. In determining to take action to dilute the Redstones' voting interest, CBS pointed to media reports, including in The Wall Street Journal, that Ms. Redstone was considering replacing board members.

While National Amusements denies it ever considered a wholesale overhaul of CBS's board, it said in its filing that it did push to replace one CBS board member: Charles Gifford. A major figure in Boston's financial community and chairman emeritus of Bank of America, Mr. Gifford is close to Mr. Moonves and sat on CBS's powerful compensation committee, according to people familiar with the matter.

He also sits on CBS's special committee, which consists of five independent directors evaluating the merger. All five were named as plaintiffs along with CBS in Monday's lawsuit against Ms. Redstone and National Amusements.

Last Friday, Mr. Klieger, who is Ms. Redstone's lawyer in addition to being a CBS director, resurfaced longstanding concerns about Mr. Gifford and his behavior, and asked that he be removed from the board.

CBS said in a statement that it is "unfortunate and revealing that NAI has resorted to baseless personal attacks against a member of the CBS Board and its Special Committee," adding that the allegations against him are "not only vague and unsubstantiated, they are utterly inconsistent with our knowledge of him." CBS added that just six weeks ago NAI "expressed its intention in an SEC filing to re-elect him."

Mr. Gifford referred a call to CBS and its statement.

National Amusements argues that voting to strip it of its controlling position would be "a breach of fiduciary duty by the directors who vote in favor of it" with "simply no precedent in Delaware law." It further argues that the dilutive dividend would be "invalid," based on past court actions protecting the rights of controlling shareholders.

CBS countered that it is a "basic principle of Delaware law that a controlling stockholder cannot use its control over corporate process to harm other stockholders."

National Amusements said it was "at a loss to explain" CBS's actions "except that CBS Board and management team have simply become uncomfortable with the reality that CBS has a controlling stockholder and would prefer that that not be the case."

--Peg Brickley contributed to this article.

Write to Keach Hagey at [email protected] and Joe Flint at [email protected]

Stocks mentioned in the article
ChangeLast1st jan.
CBS CORPORATION 0.09% 58.14 Delayed Quote.-1.66%
VIACOM -0.04% 28.59 Delayed Quote.-7.24%
share with twitter share with LinkedIn share with facebook
share via e-mail
Latest news on CBS CORPORATION
07/16CBS : Showtime Says There Has Been 'Widespread Misinformation' About Character o..
07/12VIACOM : S&P Affirms Viacom, Removes from CreditWatch
07/09CBS : T-Mobile and CBS-Owned WLNY-TV Complete Early Spectrum Repack in New York ..
07/02Coming soon from Netflix - Three dozen billboards in Hollywood
06/25CBS expands NFL streaming rights to include mobile devices
06/25AT&T : Met With CBS Before Time Warner -- WSJ
06/25WSJ : AT&T Expressed Interest In CBS To Shari Redstone Before Time Warner Deal
06/24AT&T : Expressed Interest in CBS to Shari Redstone Before Time Warner Deal
06/23CBS : Shari Redstone's Path to Power -- WSJ -2-
06/23SUMNER REDSTONE : Shari Redstone's Path to Power -- WSJ
More news
News from SeekingAlpha
07/12Netflix surpasses HBO to lead Emmy nominations 
07/09T-Mobile, CBS finish early spectrum repack in New York City 
07/02GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY : How To Play The Next 12 Months For CBS 
06/29CBS Could Be Undervalued By 50% Or More 
06/26MOFFETTNATHANSON : Amazon should buy CBS to take on Netflix 
Financials ($)
Sales 2018 14 664 M
EBIT 2018 3 099 M
Net income 2018 2 011 M
Debt 2018 9 327 M
Yield 2018 1,33%
P/E ratio 2018 11,09
P/E ratio 2019 9,88
EV / Sales 2018 2,14x
EV / Sales 2019 1,98x
Capitalization 21 992 M
Duration : Period :
CBS Corporation Technical Analysis Chart | CBS | US1248572026 | 4-Traders
Technical analysis trends CBS CORPORATION
Short TermMid-TermLong Term
Income Statement Evolution
Mean consensus OUTPERFORM
Number of Analysts 29
Average target price 66,2 $
Spread / Average Target 14%
EPS Revisions
Leslie Moonves Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Jo Ann Ross President & Chief Advertising Revenue Officer
Joseph R. Ianniello Chief Operating Officer
David F. Poltrack Chief Research Officer & President-CBS Vision
Douglas Rousso Chief Technology Officer
Sector and Competitors
1st jan.Capitalization (M$)
SKY50.49%34 287