FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

April 27, 2018

Company Name: Leopalace21 Corporation

Representative:

Eisei Miyama, President and CEO

Code Number:

8848 (Tokyo Stock Exchange, First Section)

Contact:

Bunya Miyao, Director

Tel: +81-3-5350-0216

E-mail:ir@leopalace21.com

Notice Concerning Repair Works on

Discrepancies with Construction Certificate Documents

Leopalace21 Corporation (Headquarters: Nakano, Tokyo; President and CEO: Eisei Miyama; "Leopalace21") announces that there were discrepancies between construction certificate documents (floor plans for receiving construction certification) and the actual construction of apartment series "Gold Nail" and "New Gold Nail" ("subject properties"), developed and sold by Leopalace21. We will be inspecting all subject properties and carrying out repair works.

We sincerely apologize for the distress and trouble we have caused to our customers and related parties.

  • 1. Discrepancy Parting wall of small-scale attic (Appendix 1)

    Parting wall* of small-scale attic shown in the construction certificate documents was not constructed.

    *Parting wall is the wall that separates dwelling units (rooms). To prevent the spreading of fire, these walls must be fireproof or semi-fireproof as well as incorporate sound insulation structure, and should reach the small-scale attic or roof.

  • 2. Properties to be investigated All subject properties (915 existing buildings out of 1,036 buildings constructed, Appendix 2) Sales period: January 1994 to December 1995

  • 3. Background of the announcement On March 29 and April 17, we received a notice concerning discrepancies between construction certificate documents and the actual construction from two owners of the subject properties.

    Through an inspection done by the company, we found that discrepancies were not an isolated incident, and the inclusion of parting walls in construction certificate documents was extensive. We have decided to carry out and announce the construction of these parting walls to fulfill our responsibility as a construction company.

  • 4. Safety of the properties Since the parting walls in the subject properties reach the roof structure and noncombustible materials are used in the ceiling which prevents the spreading of fire, we believe safety is secured.

    However, we have not obtained an objective evaluation as of this time, and therefore will promptly respond to any matters while consulting with specific administrative agencies

  • 5. Future course of action Inspection of all subject properties will be carried out, and repair work will be done on properties with discrepancies with construction certificate documents, under consultation with specific administrative agencies.

    We will promptly notify the situation to owners of all subject properties, adjust the contents and schedule of repair work individually, as well as inform our occupants. We will bear all expenses related to repair work.

  • 6. Future schedule Out of 915 subject properties (Company managed properties: 194 buildings / Properties managed by other companies: 721 buildings), we have completed inspection of 95 buildings managed by the company (of which, parting wall constructed in 9 buildings*, no parting wall in the remaining 86 buildings). We will complete inspection of the remaining 820 buildings by July, promptly adjusting schedules with owners and occupants. Repair work will be sequentially done and we aim completion by January 2019.

*We believe parting walls were constructed in the 9 buildings due to individual negotiations, etc.

Schedule of inspection and repair work

Apr 2018

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Jan 2019

No. of buildings

Inspection

(915 buildings total)

95 complete, 820 remaining

Repair work

194 managed by Leopalace21, 721 managed by other companies

  • 7. Inspection of properties other than subject properties There was no incidence in which a parting wall was not constructed in our sample inspection of properties other than subject properties. However, we will undertake investigations in addition to ordinary periodic inspections of all Leopalace series other than the subject properties, and will respond appropriately while receiving external advice.

  • 8. Impact on business results arising from this case We believe that the impact on business results from this case is minor.

Appendix 1. Cross section of property structure

Appendix 2. Buildings by Prefecture (as of April 27, 2018)

(No. of buildings)

Prefecture

Properties managed by Leopalace21

Properties managed by other companies

Total

1

Miyagi

1

0

1

2

Fukushima

2

0

2

3

Tochigi

1

18

19

4

Gunma

5

45

50

5

Saitama

27

105

132

6

Ibaraki

7

35

42

7

Chiba

21

95

116

8

Tokyo

5

20

25

9

Nagano

0

4

4

10

Yamanashi

2

7

9

11

Kanagawa

20

39

59

12

Shizuoka

10

63

73

13

Gifu

6

21

27

14

Aichi

9

52

61

15

Mie

7

18

25

16

Shiga

4

0

4

17

Nara

1

10

11

18

Kyoto

2

3

5

19

Osaka

12

12

24

20

Hyogo

23

62

85

21

Okayama

14

27

41

22

Hiroshima

3

6

9

23

Kagawa

0

3

3

24

Yamaguchi

0

1

1

25

Fukuoka

9

44

53

26

Saga

1

13

14

27

Oita

0

3

3

28

Kumamoto

2

15

17

Total

194

721

915

Attachments

  • Original document
  • Permalink

Disclaimer

Leopalace21 Corporation published this content on 27 April 2018 and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 27 April 2018 06:09:18 UTC