White Cliff Minerals : Abundant Visible Gold identified at Aucu Gold Deposit

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

Sampling

Techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels,

random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling

Trenches were sampled by hand using a rock hammer

with samples collected in 1 metre intervals by chipping across the entire 1 metre rock face.

Rock chip samples were collected by hand using a rock hammer with multiple pieces of rock collect at one

location for each sample.

Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

The sample locations are picked up by handheld GPS. Sample rock types were recorded where the rock was identifiable. Sampling was carried out under standard industry protocols and QAQC procedures

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

Samples ranged between 1 and 3 kg were crushed to

2mm and a 200 gram subsample was extracted and pulverized to produce a 1-2 gram sample for gold analysis by Aqua Regia digest and Atomic Adsorption Spectrophotometry (AAS), and for copper analysis via pressed pellet X-ray florescence (XRF).

Drilling Techniques

Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole

hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).

No drilling has been carried out

Drill sample recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip

sample recoveries and results assessed

No drilling has been carried out

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and

ensure representative nature of the samples.

No drilling has been carried out

Whether a relationship exists between sample

recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

No drilling has been carried out

Logging

Whether core and chip samples have been

geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

No drilling has been carried out

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature.

Core (or costean, channel, etc.) Photography

No logging has been carried out. The samples

collected are rock chips and trench samples. Sample lithology is qualitative

The total length and percentage of the relevant

intersections logged.

Refer to text in the main body of the announcement

Sub-sampling techniques and

sample preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

No drilling has been carried out

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split,

etc. and whether sampled wet or dry.

Samples were collected directly from the rock.

Samples taken were dry.

For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique

Samples were collected directly from the trench or surface via rock hammer sampling. Rock samples are inherently variable and do not accurately represent the average grade of the surrounding rock. Rock samples are used as an non-quantitative guide for assessing prospectivity hence are regarded as suitable for this purpose

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-

sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples

At this stage of the exploration no sub sampling is

undertaken during the collection stage

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected,

including for instance results for field duplicate/second-

The whole sample collected is crushed to 2mm and a

200g sub-sample pulverised. A 1-10 gram sub sample of the pulverised sample is analysed. Field duplicates

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

half sampling

are not routinely collected at the rock sampling stage

of exploration

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size

of the material being sampled

The sample sizes are considered to be appropriate to

correctly represent the sought after mineralisation style

Quality of assay data

and laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the

assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

The analytical techniques used Aqua Regia digest,

Atomic adsorption Spectrophotometry for gold analysis and XRF for copper analysis suitable for the reconnaissance style sampling undertaken.

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

Copper analysis was carried out by X-Ray Fluorescent Spectrometer Quant'X (Thermo Scientific (Austria- USA)). Analysis is performed at a rhodium tube with

30…50 kV voltage and 0, 13 mm palladium filter.

Gold analysis was carried out using a Thermo Scientific Solar S2 AA-Spectrometer with Atom Trap STAT (Slotted Tube Atom Trap), gaseous hydride generation system (VP100 Continuous Flow Vapour System)

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g.

standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established

Laboratory QAQC involves the use of internal lab

standards using certified reference material, blanks, splits and replicates as part of the in house procedures.

Verification of

sampling and assaying

The verification of significant intersections by either

independent or alternative company personnel.

An executive director has visually verified significant

intersections in rock samples from the Chanach project.

The use of twinned holes

Not Applicable

Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures,

data verification, data storage (physical and electronic)

protocols

Primary data was collected using a set of standard

Excel templates on paper and re-entered into laptop computers. The information was sent to WCN in-house database manager for validation and compilation into an Access database.

Discuss any adjustment to assay data

No adjustments or calibrations were made to any assay data used in this report.

Location of data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine

workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

Sample locations were recorded using handheld

Garmin GPS60s. Elevation values were in AHD RL and values recorded within the database. Expected accuracy is + or - 5 m for easting, northing and 10m

for elevation coordinates.

No down hole surveying techniques were used due to the sampling methods used.

Specification of the grid system used.

The grid system is WGS84 UTM (zone 42 north)

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

Topographic surface uses handheld GPS elevation data, which is adequate at the current stage of the project.

Data spacing and

distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

The nominal sample spacing is 1 m (northing) by 1 m

(easting).

Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

The mineralised domains have not yet demonstrated sufficient continuity in both geological and grade continuity to support the definition of Mineral Resource and Reserves, and the classifications applied under the 2012 JORC Code.

Whether sample compositing has been applied.

Samples have not been composited

Orientation of data in

relation to geological structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves

unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

The sampling method is used to provide a surface

sample only.

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and

the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material

No orientation based sampling bias has been identified

in the data at this point.

Sample security

The measures taken to ensure sample security.

Sample security is managed by the Company. Since at this stage these are field analyses, no sample transit

security has been necessary.

Audits of reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of sampling

The Company carries out its own internal data audits.

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation

Commentary

techniques and data.

No problems have been detected.

Criteria

Explanation

Commentary

Mineral tenement

and land tenure status

Type, reference name/number, location and

ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

The mineralisation is located within Exploration License

AP590 which is a Joint Venture between White Cliff

Minerals Limited (90%) and BW3 Pty Ltd (10%) There are no other material issues

The security of the tenure held at the time of

reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

The tenement is in good standing and no known

impediments exist.

Exploration done by

other parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by

other parties.

None

Geology

Deposit type, geological setting and style of

mineralisation.

The geological setting is of Cambrian to Permian aged

intrusive porphyry systems, bounded by overlying basaltic, and sedimentary rocks. Mineralisation is

mostly situated within granitic porphyry units as broad alteration containing copper sulphides and within

narrow quartz veins and faults.

Drill Hole Information

A summary of all information material to the

understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:

No drilling has been carried out

easting and northing of the drill hole collar

elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation

above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar

dip and azimuth of the hole

down hole length and interception depth

hole length.

If the exclusion of this information is justified on the

basis that the information is not

Data Aggregation

methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging

techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

No length weighting has been applied due to the nature

of the sampling technique. No top-cuts have been applied.

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths

of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

Not applicable for the sampling methods used.

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal

equivalent values should be clearly stated

No metal equivalent values are used for reporting

exploration results.

Relationship

between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths

These relationships are particularly important in the

reporting of Exploration Results:

If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width not known').

The sampling technique used defines a surficial

geochemical expression. No information is attainable relating to the geometry of any mineralisation based on these results.

Diagrams

Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and

tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole

collar locations and appropriate sectional views`

Refer to figures in the body of text.

Balanced Reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration

Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results

All results within the mineralised zones are reported.

Other substantive

exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material,

should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and

method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk

density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock

NIL

Criteria

Explanation

Commentary

characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating

substances.

Further Work

The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g.

tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

RAB/AC drilling will be used to further define the nature

and extent of the geochemical anomalism, and to gain lithological information.