Summary

● The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.

● Overall, and from a short-term perspective, the company presents an interesting fundamental situation.

● The company has a good ESG score relative to its sector, according to Refinitiv.


Strengths

● Its low valuation, with P/E ratio at 4.17 and 5.9 for the ongoing fiscal year and 2023 respectively, makes the stock pretty attractive with regard to earnings multiples.

● The company is one of the most undervalued, with an "enterprise value to sales" ratio at 0.38 for the 2022 fiscal year.

● The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.

● Given the positive cash flows generated by its business, the company's valuation level is an asset.

● This company will be of major interest to investors in search of a high dividend stock.

● Over the past year, analysts have regularly revised upwards their sales forecast for the company.

● Growth remains a strong point in this company. In their sales forecast, analysts sound optimistic with regard to sales prospects.

● For the past year, analysts covering the stock have been revising their EPS expectations upwards in a significant manner.

● For the last 4 months, the company has been enjoying highly positive EPS revisions, which were frequently and significantly raised.

● Analysts covering this company mostly recommend stock overweighting or purchase.

● The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.

● Consensus analysts have strongly revised their opinion of the company over the past 12 months.


Weaknesses

● According to Standard & Poor's' forecast, revenue growth prospects are expected to be very low for the next fiscal years.

● The potential for earnings per share (EPS) growth in the coming years appears limited according to current analyst estimates.

● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.