Summary

● The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.

● The company has a good ESG score relative to its sector, according to Refinitiv.


Strengths

● Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.

● Margins returned by the company are among the highest on the stock exchange list. Its core activity clears big profits.

● Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.

● Over the last twelve months, the sales forecast has been frequently revised upwards.

● Growth remains a strong point in this company. In their sales forecast, analysts sound optimistic with regard to sales prospects.

● For the past year, analysts covering the stock have been revising their EPS expectations upwards in a significant manner.

● Analysts remain confident with respect to the group's activity and, more often than not, have revised upwards their earnings per share estimates.

● Analysts have a positive opinion on this stock. Average consensus recommends overweighting or purchasing the stock.

● The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been strongly revised upwards over the last four months.

● Consensus analysts have strongly revised their opinion of the company over the past 12 months.

● Historically, the company has been releasing figures that are above expectations.


Weaknesses

● The company's valuation in terms of earnings multiples is rather high. Indeed, the firm is getting paid 54.74 times its estimated earnings per share for the ongoing year.

● Based on current prices, the company has particularly high valuation levels.

● The company appears highly valued given the size of its balance sheet.

● The company is highly valued given the cash flows generated by its activity.

● The firm pays small or no dividend to shareholders. For that reason, it is not a yield company.

● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.