The following discussion compares the Company's financial condition at
PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW The Company recorded net income of$31.2 million for 2022 and net income of$15.4 million for 2021. The basic and diluted income per share was$1.57 and$1.17 for fiscal year 2022 and 2021, respectively. When comparing net income for 2022 to 2021, earnings increased due to increases in net interest income$37.2 million and noninterest income of$9.6 million primarily offset by an increase in noninterest expense of$23.5 million related to increases in salaries and wages, employee benefits, and other loan and customer expenses primarily due to the acquisition ofSevern Bancorp, Inc. ("Severn") in the fourth quarter of 2021. Total assets were$3.477 billion atDecember 31, 2022 , a$17.1 million , or less than 1.0%, increase when compared to$3.460 billion at the end of 2021. During 2022, the Company shifted its asset mix by deploying cash and cash equivalents into higher yielding loans and investment securities. Total deposits decreased$16.5 million , or less than 1%, when compared toDecember 31, 2021 . The decrease in total deposits was due to decreases in money market and savings accounts of$85.7 million , noninterest-bearing deposits of$65.5 million and time deposits of$35.2 million , partially offset by an increase in interest bearing checking accounts of$170.0 million . Total stockholders' equity increased$13.6 million , or 3.9%, when compared toDecember 31, 2021 , primarily due to current year earnings, partially offset by unrealized losses on available for sale securities of$9.1 million and dividends paid to common stockholders of$9.5 million . AtDecember 31, 2022 , the ratio of total equity to total assets was 10.48% and the ratio of total tangible equity to total tangible assets was 8.67%, compared to 10.14% and 8.25% for 2021.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and follow general practices within the industries in which it operates. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. The most significant accounting policies that the Company follows are presented in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the notes to the financial statements and in this discussion, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, management has determined that the accounting policies with respect to the allowance for credit losses, accounting for loans acquired in business combinations, and goodwill are critical accounting policies. These policies are considered critical because they relate to accounting areas that require the most subjective or complex judgments, and, as such, could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available.
Loans Acquired in a Business Combination
Acquired loans are classified as either (i) purchase credit-impaired ("PCI") loans or (ii) purchased performing loans and are recorded at fair value on
the date of acquisition. 38 Table of Contents PCI loans are those for which there is evidence of credit deterioration since origination and for which it is probable at the date of acquisition that the Company will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. When determining fair value, PCI loans are aggregated into pools of loans based on common risk characteristics as of the date of acquisition such as loan type, date of origination, and evidence of credit quality deterioration such as internal risk grades and past due and nonaccrual status. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the "nonaccretable difference." Any excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is referred to as the "accretable yield" and is recognized as interest income over the remaining life of the loan when there is a reasonable expectation about the amount and timing of such cash flows. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate our estimate of cash flows expected to be collected on PCI loans. Estimates of cash flows for PCI loans require significant judgment. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan losses resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent significant increases in cash flows may result in a reversal of post-acquisition provision for loan losses or a transfer from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield that increases interest income over the remaining life of the loan, or pool(s) of loans. Disposals of loans, which may include sale of loans to third parties, receipt of payments in full or in part from the borrower or foreclosure of the collateral, result in removal of the loan from the PCI loan portfolio at its carrying amount. PCI loans are not classified as nonperforming by the Company at the time they are acquired, regardless of whether they had been classified as nonperforming by the previous holder of such loans, and they will not be classified as nonperforming so long as, at quarterly re-estimation periods, we believe we will fully collect the new carrying value of the pools of loans. The Company accounts for purchased performing loans using the contractual cash flows method of recognizing discount accretion based on the acquired loans' contractual cash flows. Purchased performing loans are recorded at fair value, including a credit discount. The fair value discount is accreted as an adjustment to yield over the estimated lives of the loans. There is no allowance for loan losses established at the acquisition date for purchased performing loans. A provision for loan losses may be required for any deterioration in these loans in future periods.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses represents management's estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. Determining the amount of the allowance for credit losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of similar loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions and other factors impacting the loan portfolio, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the consolidated balance sheets. Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements describes the methodology used to determine the allowance for credit losses. A discussion of the allowance determination and factors driving changes in the amount of the allowance for credit losses is included in the Asset Quality - Provision for Credit Losses and Risk Management section below. Goodwill Impairment
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Determining fair value is subjective, requiring the use of estimates, assumptions and management judgment.Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment, usually during the fourth quarter, and on an interim basis if circumstances dictate. Impairment testing requires a qualitative assessment or that the fair value of each of the Company's reporting units be compared to the carrying amount of its net assets, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than book value, an expense may be required to write down the related goodwill to record an impairment loss. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , the Company had banking and mortgage reporting units. 39
Table of Contents
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements discuss the expected impact of accounting policies recently issued or proposed but not yet required to be adopted. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards materially affects our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity, the impacts are discussed in the applicable section(s) of this discussion and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
Net interest income remains the most significant factor affecting our results of operations. Net interest income represents the excess of interest and fees earned on total average earning assets (loans, investment securities, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with other banks) over interest owed on average interest-bearing liabilities (deposits and borrowings). Tax-equivalent net interest income is net interest income adjusted for the tax-favored status of income from certain loans and investments. As shown in the table below, tax-equivalent net interest income for 2022 was$101.5 million . This represented a$37.2 million , or 57.8%, increase from 2021. The increase in net interest income when comparing 2022 to 2021 was primarily the result of higher average balances on earnings assets of$1.04 billion , or 47.4%, partially offset by an increase in interest bearing deposits of$684.5 million , higher rates paid on interest bearing deposits of 16bps, and additional interest on subordinated debt acquired in the 4th quarter of 2021. This was the result of a full year of integration with Severn, significant loan growth, and a rising interest rate environment resulting in higher yields on loans and deposits. Our net interest margin (i.e., tax-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets) is managed through loan and deposit pricing and asset/liability strategies. The net interest margin was 3.15% for 2022 and 2.94% for 2021. The net interest margin increased when comparing 2022 to 2021 primarily due to an increase in the average yield on total earning assets of 33bps, partially offset by higher interest rates paid on interest bearing deposits and borrowings. The net interest spread, which is the difference between the average yield on earning assets and the average rate paid for interest-bearing liabilities was 2.96% for 2022 and 2.80% for 2021. 40
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the major components of net interest income, on a
tax-equivalent basis, for the presented years ended
2022 2021 Average Interest Yield/ Average Interest Yield/ (Dollars in thousands) Balance (1) Rate Balance (1) Rate Earning assets Loans (2), (3)$ 2,293,627 $ 99,276 4.33 %$ 1,568,468 $ 64,945 4.14 % Investment securities: Taxable 589,729 11,507 1.95 329,890 5,006 1.52 Tax-exempt 113 7 6.19 - - - Interest-bearing deposits 337,203 3,210 0.95 286,765 368 0.13 Total earning assets 3,220,672 114,000 3.54 % 2,185,123 70,319 3.21 % Cash and due from banks 18,158 19,838 Other assets 221,592 127,704 Allowance for credit losses (15,441) (15,068) Total assets$ 3,444,981 $ 2,317,597 Interest-bearing liabilities Demand deposits$ 638,105 3,869 0.61 %$ 450,399 633 0.14 % Money market and savings 1,043,032 3,609 0.35 695,056 1,433 0.21 deposits Certificates of deposit 239,927 1,364 0.57 144,209 1,214 0.84$100,000 or more Other time deposits 204,536 1,141 0.56 151,429 1,181 0.78 Interest-bearing deposits 2,125,600 9,983 0.47 1,441,093 4,461 0.31 Securities sold under retail repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased 683 2 0.29 3,017 8 0.27 Advances from FHLB - short-term 1,863 72 3.86 - - - Advances from FHLB - long-term 7,701 35 0.46 1,671 10 0.60 Subordinated debt 42,917 2,451 5.71 27,528 1,560 5.67 Total interest-bearing 2,178,764 12,543 0.58 % 1,473,309 6,039 0.41 % liabilities Noninterest-bearing deposits 888,509 574,531 Other liabilities 21,858 45,702 Stockholders' equity 355,850 224,055 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$ 3,444,981 $ 2,317,597 Net interest spread$ 101,457 2.96 %$ 64,280 2.80 % Net interest margin 3.15 % 2.94 % All amounts are reported on a tax-equivalent basis computed using the
statutory federal income tax rate of 21% for 2022 and 2021, exclusive of (1) nondeductible interest expense. The tax-equivalent adjustment amounts used in
the above table to compute yields aggregated
thousand in 2021.
(2) Average loan balances include nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale.
Interest income on loans includes amortized loan fees, net of costs, and (3) accretion of discounts on acquired loans, which are included in the yield
calculations.
On a tax-equivalent basis, total interest income was$114.0 million for 2022 compared to$70.3 million for 2021. The increase in interest income for 2022 compared to 2021 was primarily due to the increase in the average balance in earning assets of$1.04 billion which was due to both the acquisition of Severn and organic growth in 2022. The interest on loans had the most significant impact on total interest income, which increased$34.3 million in 2022, due to the increase in the average balance of loans of$725.2 million , or 46.2%, combined with accretion income of approximately$3.0 million in relation to acquired loans. The increase in interest income on taxable investment securities and interest-bearing deposits was due to increases in their respective average balances of$259.8 million and$50.4 million . As a percentage of total average earning assets, loans, investment securities, and interest-bearing deposits were 71.2%, 18.3%, and 10.5%, respectively, for 2022. The comparable percentages for 2021 were 71.8%, 15.1%, and 13.1%, respectively. Interest expense was$12.5 million for 2022 compared to$6.0 million for 2021. The increase in interest expense for 2022 was primarily due to the increase in the average rates paid on interest-bearing deposits, and a full year of interest on subordinated debt acquired from Severn. During 2022, money market/savings deposits, demand deposits and certificates 41
Table of Contents
of deposit over$100 thousand experienced significant growth with increases in the average balances of$348.0 million ,$187.7 million and$95.7 million , respectively, while the average rates paid on these deposits increased 47 and 14bps on demand deposits and money market/savings deposits, respectively and decreased 27bps on certificates of deposit over$100 thousand . The following Rate/Volume Variance Analysis identifies the portion of the changes in tax-equivalent net interest income attributable to changes in volume of average balances or to changes in the yield on earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The rate and volume variance for each category has been allocated on a consistent basis between rate and volume variances, based on a percentage of rate, or volume, variance to the sum of the absolute two variances. 2022 over (under) 2021 Total Caused By (Dollars in thousands) Variance Rate Volume Interest income from earning assets: Loans$ 34,331 $ 3,100
31,231
Taxable investment securities 6,501 1,718
4,783
Tax-exempt investment securities 7 -
7 Interest-bearing deposits 2,842 2,764 78 Total interest income 43,681 7,582 36,099 Interest expense on deposits and borrowed funds: Interest-bearing demand deposits 3,236 2,878
358
Money market and savings deposits 2,176 1,243
933
Time deposits 110 (862)
972
Securities sold under repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased (6) 1
(7)
Advances from FHLB - Short-term 72 -
72
Advances from FHLB - Long-term 25 (2)
27 Subordinated debt 891 11 880 Total interest expense 6,504 3,269 3,235 Net interest income$ 37,177 $ 4,313 $ 32,864 Noninterest Income
Noninterest income increased$9.6 million , or 71.0%, in 2022 when compared to 2021. The increase in noninterest income primarily consisted of increases in revenue associated with the mortgage division of$4.3 million , service charges on deposit accounts of$2.3 million , revenue from Mid-Maryland Title of$1.1 million and other noninterest income of$1.2 million . The increase in other noninterest income was primarily due to increases in rental fee income of$1.3 million . These changes were all primarily attributable to the acquisition of Severn in the 4th quarter of 2021. 42
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes our noninterest income for the presented years endedDecember 31 . Years Ended Change from Prior Year 2022/ 21 (Dollars in thousands) 2022 2021 Amount Percent
Service charges on deposit accounts
66.4 % Trust and investment fee income 1,784 1,881 (97) (5.2) Gains on sales and calls of investment securities - 2 (2) (100.0) Interchange credits 4,812 3,964 848 21.4 Mortgage-banking revenue 5,210 948 4,262 449.6 Title Company revenue 1,340 247 1,093 442.5 Other noninterest income 4,288 3,060 1,228 40.1 Total$ 23,086 $ 13,498 $ 9,588 71.0 Noninterest Expense Noninterest expense, excluding merger related expenses, increased$29.9 million , or 62.0%, when compared to the same period in 2021. The increase was mainly the result of increases in salaries and wages, employee related benefits, occupancy expense, data processing, amortization of intangible assets,FDIC insurance premium expense, and legal and professional fees which were all significantly impacted by adding Severn and its operations for the full year of 2022 as well as the addition of two new branches in 2022
The Company had 464 full-time equivalent employees at
The following table summarizes our noninterest expense for the years endedDecember 31 . Years Ended Change from Prior Year 2022/ 21 (Dollars in thousands) 2022 2021 Amount Percent Salaries and wages$ 35,931 $ 21,222 $ 14,709 69.3 % Employee benefits 9,908 7,262 2,646 36.4 Occupancy expense 6,242 3,690 2,552 69.2
Furniture and equipment expense 2,018 1,553
465 29.9 Data processing 6,890 5,001 1,889 37.8 Directors' fees 839 620 219 35.3
Amortization of intangible assets 1,988 734 1,254 170.8 FDIC insurance premium expense 1,426 1,015 411 40.5 Other real estate owned expenses, net 65 4
61 1,525.0 Legal and professional fees 2,840 1,742 1,098 63.0 Merger related expenses 2,098 8,530 (6,432) (75.4) Other noninterest expenses 10,077 5,433 4,644 85.5 Total$ 80,322 $ 56,806 $ 23,516 41.4 Income Taxes The Company reported an income tax expense of$11.0 million for 2022, compared to an income tax expense of$5.8 million for 2021. The effective tax rate was 26.0% for 2022 and 27.4% for 2021. The Company's effective tax rate decreased in 2022 primarily due to nondeductible expenses related to the acquisition of Severn in 2021, higher pre-tax earnings and reapportionment of assets and revenue for state income tax purposes. Please refer to Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information. 43 Table of Contents REVIEW OF FINANCIAL CONDITION Asset and liability composition, capital resources, asset quality, market risk, interest sensitivity and liquidity are all factors that affect our financial condition. The following sections discuss each of these factors.
Assets
Interest-Bearing Deposits with Other Banks and Federal Funds Sold
The Company invests excess cash balances (i.e., the excess cash remaining after funding loans and investing in securities with deposits and borrowings) in interest-bearing accounts and federal funds sold offered by our correspondent banks. These liquid investments are maintained at a level that management believes is necessary to meet current liquidity needs. Total interest-bearing deposits with other banks decreased$548.9 million from$566.7 million atDecember 31, 2021 to$17.8 million atDecember 31, 2022 . The Company principally utilized the excess liquidity to fund increases in both loans held for investment of$436.9 million and investment securities of$128.3 million as compared to the prior year end.
The investment portfolio is structured to provide us with liquidity and also plays an important role in the overall management of interest rate risk. Investment securities available for sale are stated at estimated fair value based on quoted prices and may be sold as part of the asset/liability management strategy or which may be sold in response to changing interest rates. Net unrealized holding gains and losses on available for sale debt securities are reported net of related income taxes as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of stockholders' equity. Investment securities in the held to maturity category are stated at cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. We have the intent and current ability to hold such securities until maturity. AtDecember 31, 2022 , 14% of the portfolio was classified as available for sale and 86% as held to maturity. AtDecember 31, 2021 , 23% of the portfolio was classified as available for sale and 77% as held to maturity. Total investment securities increased$128.3 million from$527.1 million atDecember 31, 2021 to$655.4 million atDecember 31, 2022 . The Bank purchased$208.1 million in debt securities in 2022, all of which were classified as held to maturity. The investment strategy remained relatively consistent when comparing 2022 to 2021 due to excess liquidity, which was partially utilized to purchase securities with higher average yields than the then current overnight Fed funds rate. The larger percentage of securities designated as held to maturity reflects the amount that management believes is not needed to support our anticipated growth and liquidity needs. Investment securities available for sale were$83.6 million at the end of 2022 and$117.0 million at the end of 2021. The Bank did not purchase any available for sale securities in 2022 and 2021. At year-end 2022, 21.7% of the available for sale securities in the portfolio wereU.S. Government agencies, 76.0% of the securities were mortgage-backed securities and 2.3% were corporate bonds, compared to 19.1%, 79.2% and 1.7%, respectively, at year-end 2021. Our investments in mortgage-backed securities are issued or guaranteed byU.S. Government agencies or government-sponsored agencies. Investment securities held to maturity amounted to$559.5 million at the end of 2022 and$404.6 million at the end of 2021. The Bank purchased$208.1 million in held to maturity securities in 2022 and$255.5 million for 2021. During 2022, the Bank purchased twenty-two mortgage-backed securities totaling$142.2 million , eleven government agency bonds totaling$62.4 million , two subordinated debt instruments from other banks amounting to$2.0 million and three community reinvestment bonds amounting to$1.5 million . In 2021, the Bank purchased thirty-two mortgage-backed securities totaling$177.1 million , fifteen government agency bonds amounting to 75.9 million and two subordinated debt instruments from other banks amounting to$2.5 million . At year-end 2022, 27.2% of the held to maturity securities in the portfolio wereU.S. Government agencies, 70.4% of the securities were mortgage-backed securities, 2.1% were subordinated debt instruments and less than 1% were community reinvestment bonds. At year-end 2021, 21.5% of the held to maturity securities in the portfolio wereU.S. Government agencies, 74.8% of the securities were mortgage-backed securities, 3.6% of the securities were subordinated debt instruments and less than 1% were community reinvestment bonds. 44
Table of Contents
The following tables set forth the weighted average yields by maturity category
of the bond investment portfolio as of
1 Year or Less 1-5 Years 5-10 Years Over 10 Years Average Average Average Average (Dollars in thousands) Yield Yield Yield Yield 2022 Available for sale: U.S. Government agencies - % 4.49 % 1.53 % - % Mortgage-backed 1.89 2.19 2.20 1.89 Other Debt Securities - - 2.95 - Total available for sale 1.89 2.34 1.82 1.89 Held to maturity: U.S. Government agencies 0.40 % 2.57 % 2.42 % 3.08 % Mortgage-backed (1.24) 0.26 3.13 2.21
States and political subdivisions1 - 4.52
- 4.63 Other Debt Securities - 8.37 4.64 - Total held to maturity 0.33 2.47 2.36 2.24 1 Yields have been adjusted to reflect a tax equivalent basis using the statutory federal tax rate of 21%. 1 Year or Less 1-5 Years 5-10 Years Over 10 Years Average Average Average Average (Dollars in thousands) Yield Yield Yield Yield 2021 Available for sale: U.S. Government agencies - % 1.46 % 1.13 % 1.73 % Mortgage-backed 1.60 1.68 1.94 0.83 Other Debt Securities - - 2.95 - Total available for sale 1.60 1.66 1.64 0.85 Held to maturity: U.S. Government agencies - % 1.05 % 1.26 % 1.79 % Mortgage-backed - (1.01) 0.43 1.54
States and political subdivisions2 5.20 -
- - Other Debt Securities 2.68 6.50 4.21 - Total held to maturity 3.03 1.74 1.27 1.55
2 Yields have been adjusted to reflect a tax equivalent basis using the statutory
federal tax rate of 21%. Loans Held for Sale We originate residential mortgage loans for sale on the secondary market, which we have elected to carry at fair value. AtDecember 31, 2022 , the fair value of loans held for sale amounted to$4.2 million and$37.7 million atDecember 31, 2021 . When we sell mortgage loans we make certain representations to the purchaser related to loan ownership, loan compliance and legality, and accurate documentation, among other things. If a loan is found to be out of compliance with any of the representations subsequent to the date of purchase, we may be required to repurchase the loan or indemnify the purchaser.
The Company was not required to repurchase any loans during 2021 or 2022.
45 Table of Contents Loans Held for Investment
The loan portfolio is the primary source of our income. Loans totaled
The following table represents the composition of the Company's loan portfolio
for the presented years ended
December 31, 2022 Loans acquired from (Dollars in thousands) Legacy Loans Severn acquisition Total Loans Construction$ 226,908 $ 19,411$ 246,319 Residential real estate 680,423 130,074 810,497 Commercial real estate 879,265 186,144 1,065,409 Commercial 111,826 35,843 147,669 Consumer 285,315 711 286,026
Total loans excluding PPP loans 2,183,737 372,183
2,555,920 PPP loans 187 - 187 Total loans$ 2,183,924 $ 372,183$ 2,556,107 Allowance for credit losses (16,643) Total loans, net$ 2,539,464 December 31, 2021 Loans acquired from (Dollars in thousands) Legacy Loans Severn acquisition Total Loans Construction$ 145,151 $ 94,202$ 239,353 Residential real estate 469,863 184,906 654,769 Commercial real estate 679,816 216,413 896,229 Commercial 128,485 47,332 175,817 Consumer 124,496 951 125,447
Total loans excluding PPP loans 1,547,811 543,804
2,091,615 PPP loans 18,371 9,189 27,560 Total loans$ 1,566,182 $ 552,993$ 2,119,175 Allowance for credit losses (13,944) Total loans, net$ 2,105,231 The acquisition of Severn added$584.6 million in total loans as of the acquisition date, of which$372.2 million in total loans remained outstanding as ofDecember 31, 2022 . Excluding these loans and legacy PPP loans, total legacy loans increased$635.9 million , or 41.1%, when compared toDecember 31, 2021 . AtDecember 31, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , PPP loans accounted for$187 thousand and$27.6 million of total loans, respectively. Most of our loans, excluding PPP loans, are secured by real estate and are classified as construction, residential or commercial real estate loans. The increase in legacy loans, excluding PPP loans, was comprised of increases in residential real estate of$210.6 million , or 44.8%, commercial real estate loans of$199.4 million , or 29.3%, consumer loans of$160.8 million , or 129.2%, and construction loans of$81.8 million , or 56.3%, offset by a decrease in commercial loans$16.7 million , or 13.0%, atDecember 31, 2022 compared toDecember 31, 2021 . AtDecember 31, 2022 , the legacy loan portfolio, excluding PPP loans, was comprised of 40.3% commercial real estate, 31.2% residential real estate, 10.4% construction, 5.1% commercial and 13.1% consumer. That compares to 43.9%, 30.4%, 9.4%, 8.3% and 8.0, respectively, atDecember 31, 2021 . AtDecember 31, 2022 , 22.9% of the loan portfolio had fixed interest rates and 77.1% had adjustable interest rates, compared to 72.6% and 27.4%, respectively, atDecember 31, 2021 . See the discussion below under the caption "Asset Quality - Provision for Credit Losses and Risk Management" and Note 4, "Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses", in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. We do not engage in foreign or subprime lending activities. 46
Table of Contents
The following table below sets forth the maturities and interest rate
sensitivity of the loan portfolio at
Maturing after
Maturing after
Maturing one but within five but within Maturing after (Dollars in thousands) within one year five years fifteen years fifteen years Total Construction $ 146,613 $ 50,236 $ 38,947 $ 10,523$ 246,319 Residential real estate 16,411 103,747 157,854 532,485 810,497 Commercial real estate 37,479 384,861 544,919 98,150 1,065,409 Commercial 7,588 83,894 33,250 23,124 147,856 Consumer 1,182 47,202 96,970 140,672 286,026 Total $ 209,273$ 669,940 $ 871,940 $ 804,954 $ 2,556,107 Rate terms: Fixed-interest rate loans $ 32,900 $ 39,772
176,373 630,168 762,421 400,761 1,969,723 Total $ 209,273$ 669,940 $ 871,940 $ 804,954 $ 2,556,107 Liabilities Deposits The Bank uses deposits primarily to fund loans and to purchase investment securities. Total deposits decreased from$3.03 billion atDecember 31, 2021 to$3.01 billion atDecember 31, 2022 . When compared toDecember 31, 2021 total deposits decreased$16.5 million , or less than 1%. The decrease in deposit products consisted of the following: money market/savings deposits of$85.7 , noninterest-bearing deposits of$65.5 million and time deposits of$35.2 million . Interest bearing checking accounts increased$170.0 million . The following table sets forth the average balances of deposits and the percentage of each category to total average deposits for the years endedDecember 31 . Average Balances (Dollars in thousands) 2022 2021 Noninterest-bearing demand$ 888,509 29.5 %$ 574,531 28.5 % Interest-bearing deposits Demand 638,105 21.2 450,399 22.3 Money market and savings 1,043,032 34.6 695,056 34.5 Certificates of deposit,$100,000 to$249,999 170,443 5.6 93,898
4.7
Certificates of deposit,$250,000 or more 69,484 2.3 50,311 2.5 Other time deposits 204,536 6.8 151,429 7.5 Total$ 3,014,109 100.0 %$ 2,015,624 100.0 % Average interest-bearing deposits increased$684.5 million , or 47.5%, in 2022, compared to an increase of$384.5 million , or 36.4%, in 2021. Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased$314.0 million , or 54.6%, in 2022, compared to an increase of$143.2 million , or 33.2%, in 2021. Deposits provided funding for approximately 93.6% and 92.2% of average earning assets for 2022 and 2021, respectively. 47 Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the maturity ranges of certificates of deposit
with balances of
(Dollars in thousands) Uninsured Three months or less$ 8,921 $ 2,576 Over three through 6 months 7,799 2,049 Over 6 through 12 months 24,258 9,008 Over 12 months 36,734 11,234 Total$ 77,712 $ 24,867
Total estimated uninsured deposits amounted to
Securities Sold Under Retail Repurchase Agreements
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are issued in conjunction with cash management services for commercial depositors. There were no securities sold under retail purchase agreements at the end of 2022.
Short-Term and Long-Term Advances from the FHLB
The Company occasionally borrows from the FHLB to meet longer term liquidity needs, specifically to fund loan growth when liquidity from deposit growth is not sufficient. We also borrow from FHLB on a short-term basis to meet short term liquidity needs. At the end of 2022 short-term advances from FHLB were$40 million . There were no long-term FHLB borrowings at the end of 2022.
Subordinated Debt
Legacy
On
The Company has used the net proceeds of the offering for general corporate purposes, organic growth and to support the Bank's regulatory capital ratios. The Notes were structured to qualify as Tier 2 capital of the Company for regulatory capital purposes. The Notes bear an initial interest rate of 5.375% untilSeptember 1, 2025 , with interest during this period payable semi-annually in arrears. From and includingSeptember 1, 2025 , to but excluding the maturity date or early redemption date, the interest rate will reset quarterly to an annual floating rate equal to three-month SOFR, plus 526.5 basis points, with interest during this period payable quarterly in arrears. The Notes are redeemable by the Company at its option, in whole or in part, on or afterSeptember 1, 2025 . Initial debt issuance costs were$611 thousand . The debt balance of$24.7 million is presented net of unamortized issuance costs of$326 thousand atDecember 31, 2022 .
Acquired from Severn
On
The 2035 Debentures were issued pursuant to an Indenture dated as ofDecember 17, 2004 (the "2035 Indenture") between the Company andWells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee. The 2035 Debentures pay interest quarterly at a floating rate of interest of 3-month LIBOR plus 200 basis points and mature onJanuary 7, 2035 . Payments of principal, interest, premium, and other amounts under the 2035 Debentures are subordinated and junior in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all senior indebtedness of the Company, as defined in the 2035 Indenture. The 2035 Debentures are currently redeemable, in whole or in part, by the Company.U.S. regulators have directed banks to
cease offering new 48 Table of Contents
LIBOR-based products afterDecember 31, 2021 . Existing LIBOR contracts, per above, can continue to be serviced through theJune 30, 2023 cessation date; however,Wells Fargo Bank , as Trustee, will be working with holders of the 2035 Debentures to move to an (ARR) in advance of LIBOR cession, where possible. The 2035 Debentures were issued and sold to Severn Capital Trust I (the "Trust"), of which 100% of the common equity is owned by the Company. The Trust was formed for the purpose of issuing corporation-obligated mandatorily redeemable Capital Securities ("Capital Securities") to third-party investors and using the proceeds from the sale of such Capital Securities to purchase the 2035 Debentures. The 2035 Debentures held by the Trust are the sole assets of the Trust. Distributions on the Capital Securities issued by the Trust are payable quarterly at a rate per annum equal to the interest rate being earned by the Trust on the 2035 Debentures.The Capital Securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the 2035 Debentures. We have entered into an agreement which, taken collectively, fully and unconditionally guarantees the Capital Securities subject to the terms of the guarantee.
Under the terms of the 2035 Debentures, we are permitted to defer the payment of
interest on the 2035 Debentures for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods,
provided that no event of default has occurred and is continuing. As of
Capital Resources Management
Total stockholders' equity was$364.3 million atDecember 31, 2022 , compared to$350.7 million atDecember 31, 2021 . The increase in stockholders' equity in 2022 was primarily due to current year earnings, partially offset by an increase in unrealized losses on available for sale securities of$9.1 million , net of tax, and dividends paid to stockholders of$9.5 million . The ratio of period-end equity to total assets was 10.48% for 2022, as compared to 10.14% for 2021. We record unrealized holding gains (losses), net of tax, on investment securities available for sale as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of stockholders' equity. AtDecember 31, 2022 , the portion of the investment portfolio designated as "available for sale" had a net unrealized holding loss, net of tax, of$9.0 million compared to net unrealized holding gain, net of tax, of$56 thousand atDecember 31, 2021 .The Bank and Company are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on the Company's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of its assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum ratios of common equity Tier 1, Tier 1, and total capital as a percentage of assets and off-balance sheet exposures, adjusted for risk weights ranging from 0% to 1,250%. The Bank is also required to maintain capital at a minimum level based on quarterly average assets, which is known as the leverage ratio. InJuly 2013 , federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule that revised their risk-based capital requirements and the method for calculating risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with certain standards that were developed by Basel III and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rule currently applies to all depository institutions and bank holding companies and savings and loan holding companies with total consolidated assets of more than$3 billion . The Company had total consolidated assets of more than$3 billion as ofDecember 31, 2021 , due to the acquisition of Severn in the fourth quarter of 2021. As such, the Company was required to comply with the consolidated capital requirements for the first quarterly report date following the effective date of the business combination as its total assets exceeded$3 billion . As ofDecember 31, 2022 , the Bank and Company were in compliance with all applicable regulatory capital requirements to which they were subject, and the Bank was classified as "well capitalized" for purposes of the prompt corrective action regulations. 49 Table of Contents
The following table compares the Company's capital ratios to the minimum
regulatory requirements as of
Minimum Regulatory Requirements (Dollars in thousands) 2022 2021 for 2022
Common equity Tier 1 capital
322,891 279,681 Tier 2 capital 41,528 57,015 Total risk-based capital 364,419 336,696 Net risk-weighted assets 2,619,400 2,191,557 Adjusted average total assets 3,390,516 2,966,412 Risk-based capital ratios: Common equity Tier 1 11.62 % 12.76 % 7.00* Tier 1 12.33 12.76 8.50* Total capital 13.91 15.36 10.50* Tier 1 leverage ratio 9.52 9.43 4.00
* includes phased in capital conservation buffer of 2.50%
See Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about the regulatory capital positions of the Bank and Company.
Asset Quality - Provision for Credit Losses and Risk Management
Originating loans involves a degree of risk that credit losses will occur in varying amounts according to, among other factors, the types of loans being made, the credit-worthiness of the borrowers over the terms of the loans, the quality of the collateral for the loans, if any, as well as general economic conditions. Through the Company's and the Bank's Asset/Liability Management Committees, the Company's Audit Committee and the Company's Board actively reviews critical risk positions, including credit, market, liquidity and operational risk. The Company's goal in managing risk is to reduce earnings volatility, control exposure to unnecessary risk, and ensure appropriate returns for risk assumed. Senior members of management actively manage risk at the product level, supplemented with corporate level oversight through the Asset/Liability Management Committee and internal audit function. The risk management structure is designed to identify risk through a systematic process, enabling timely and appropriate action to avoid and mitigate risk. Credit risk is mitigated through loan portfolio diversification, limiting exposure to any single industry or customer, collateral protection, and prudent lending policies and underwriting criteria. The following discussion provides information and statistics on the overall quality of the Company's loan portfolio. Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements describes the accounting policies related to nonperforming loans (nonaccrual and delinquent 90 days or more), TDRs and loan charge-offs and describes the methodologies used to develop the allowance for credit losses, including the specific, historical formula, and qualitative formula components (also discussed below). Management believes the policies governing nonperforming loans, TDRs and charge-offs are consistent with regulatory standards. The amount of the allowance for credit losses and the resulting provision are reviewed monthly by senior members of management and approved quarterly by the Board of Directors. The allowance is increased by provisions for credit losses charged to expense and recoveries of loans previously charged off. It is decreased by loans charged off in the current period. Loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when considered uncollectible by management. Provisions for credit losses are made to bring the allowance for credit losses within the range of balances that are considered appropriate. The adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is determined based on management's estimate of the inherent risks associated with lending activities, estimated fair value of collateral or expected future cash flows, past experience and present indicators such as loan delinquency trends, nonaccrual loans and current market conditions. Management believes the current allowance is adequate to provide for probable and estimable losses inherent in our loan portfolio; however, future changes in the composition of the loan portfolio and financial condition of borrowers may result in additions to the 50
Table of Contents
allowance. Examination of the portfolio and allowance by various regulatory agencies and consultants engaged by the Company may result in the need for additional provisions based on information available at the time of the examination. The Bank's allowance for credit losses, is available to absorb losses from all loan segments of the portfolio. The allowance set by the Bank is subject to regulatory examination and determination as to its adequacy.
The allowance for credit losses is comprised of three parts: (i) the specific allowance; (ii) the historical formula allowance; and (iii) the qualitative formula allowance. The specific allowance is established against impaired loans until charge offs are made. Loans are considered impaired when it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest payments according to the loan's contractual terms when due. The qualitative formula allowance is determined based on management's assessment of industry trends, economic factors in the markets in which we operate, as well as other portfolio related factors. The determination of the qualitative formula allowance involves a higher risk of uncertainty and considers current risk factors that may not have yet manifested themselves in our historical loss factors. The specific allowance is used to individually allocate an allowance to loans identified as impaired. An impaired loan may involve deficiencies in the borrower's overall financial condition, payment history, support available from financial guarantors and/or the fair market value of collateral. If it is determined that there is a loss associated with an impaired loan, a specific allowance is established until a charge off is made. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible. The historical formula allowance is used to estimate the loss on internally risk-rated loans, exclusive of those identified as impaired. Loans are grouped by type (construction, residential real estate, commercial real estate, commercial or consumer). Each loan type is assigned allowance factors based on management's estimate of the risk, within a particular category using average historical charge-offs by segment over the last 16 quarters. The qualitative formula allowance is used to estimate the losses on loans stemming from more global factors such as delinquencies, loss history, effects of changes in lending policy, the experience and depth of management, national and local economic trends, concentrations of credit, the quality of the loan review system and the effect of external factors that would cause current estimated losses to deviate from the historical loss experience. Loans that are identified as pass-watch, special mention, substandard and doubtful are considered to have elevated credit risk. These loans are assigned higher allowance factors than favorably rated loans due to management's concerns regarding collectability or management's knowledge of particular elements regarding the borrower. The provision for credit losses was$1.9 million for 2022 and$(358) thousand for 2021. The increase in provision for credit losses was primarily a result of the increase in loans held for investment in 2022 of$436.9 million . Net loan recoveries totaled$774 thousand in 2022, compared to net loan recoveries of$414 thousand in 2021. The allowance for credit losses was$16.6 million , or 0.78% of period end loans, excluding PPP loans, acquired loans and the associated purchase discount mark on the acquired loans from both Severn and Northwest, atDecember 31, 2022 , compared to an allowance of$13.9 million , or 0.93% of period end loans, excluding PPP loans, acquired loans and the associated purchase discount mark on the acquired loans from both Severn and Northwest, atDecember 31, 2021 . The decrease in the percentage of the allowance for credit losses to total period end loans was primarily driven by lower historical loss experience and the elimination of pandemic related qualitative factors. The ratio of net (recoveries) to average loans was (0.03) % for 2022, compared to (0.03) % for 2021. Nonperforming loans increased at year end 2022 as compared to 2021 primarily due to increases in loans 90 days past due and still accruing of$1.3 million which was primarily a result of timing of the renewal process for certain loans that had matured, and not specific credit concerns related to the underlying borrowers. Accruing TDRs declined$1.3 million when comparing 2022 to 2021 which reflects continued workout efforts on outstanding problem loans. When comparing 2022 to 2021 loan risk categories, special mention and substandard loans decreased$4.4 million and$1.3 million , respectively. The decrease in substandard and special mention loans was primarily due to payoffs and credit risk rating upgrades during 2022. Pass/Watch loans decreased$46.4 million during 2022 when compared to 2021. Management will continue to monitor and charge off nonperforming assets as rapidly as possible and focus on the generation of healthy loan growth and new business development opportunities. 51 Table of Contents
The following table sets forth a summary of our loan loss experience for
the presented years ended
December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Percentage of net Percentage of net charge-offs (recoveries) charge-offs (recoveries) (annualized) to (annualized) to average loans average loans Net
(charge-offs) outstanding Net (charge-offs) outstanding (Dollars in thousands) Average balances recoveries during the year Average balances recoveries during the year Construction $ 243,045 $ 13 (0.01) % $ 150,669 $ 278 (0.18) %
Residential real estate 707,965 137 (0.02) 503,794 82 (0.02) Commercial real estate 965,108
945 (0.10) 645,595 114 (0.02) Commercial 159,288 (319) 0.20 188,420 (42) 0.02 Consumer 202,979 (2) - 79,990 (18) 0.02 Total$ 2,278,385 $ 774 (0.03) % $ 1,568,468 $ 414 (0.03) % Allowance for credit losses at period end as a percentage of total period end loans (1) 0.65 % 0.66 % Allowance for credit losses at period end as a percentage of total period end loans (2) 0.78 % 0.93 % Allowance for credit losses at period end as a percentage of average loans (3) 0.73 % 0.89 % Allowance for credit losses at period end as a percentage of period end nonaccrual loans 872.27 % 695.81 %
As of
(1) loans held for investment, including PPP loans of
million, respectively.
As of
(2) loans, acquired loans and the associated purchase discount mark on the
acquired loans from both Severn and Northwest.
As of
(3) loans held for investment, including PPP loans of
million, respectively.
The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for credit losses and the percentage of loans in each category to total loans for the presented years endedDecember 31 . 2022 2021 % of % of (Dollars in thousands) Amount Loans Amount Loans Construction$ 2,973 17.9 %$ 2,454 11.3 % Residential real estate 2,622 15.8 2,858 30.9 Commercial real estate 4,899 29.4 4,598 42.3 Commercial 1,652 9.9 2,070 9.6 Consumer 4,497 27.0 1,964 5.9 Total $$16,643 100.0 % $$13,944 100.0 % AtDecember 31, 2022 , nonperforming assets were$3.9 million , an increase of$902 thousand , or 29.6%, when compared toDecember 31, 2021 . The increase in nonperforming assets was primarily due to the increase in loans 90 days past due and still accruing, partially offset by a decrease in other real estate owned properties. Accruing TDRs were$4.4 million atDecember 31, 2022 , a decrease of$1.3 million , or 22.3%, when compared toDecember 31, 2021 . AtDecember 31, 2022 , the ratio of nonaccrual loans to total assets was 0.05%, a decrease from 0.06% atDecember 31, 2021 . The ratio of accruing TDRs to total assets atDecember 31, 2022 was 0.13% improving from 0.16% atDecember 31, 2021 . The Company continues to focus on the resolution of its nonperforming and problem loans. The efforts to accomplish this goal include frequently contacting borrowers until the delinquency is cured or until an acceptable payment plan has been agreed upon; obtaining updated appraisals; provisioning for credit losses; charging off loans; transferring loans to other real estate owned; aggressively marketing other real estate owned; and selling loans. The reduction of nonperforming and problem loans is and will continue to be a high priority
for the Company. 52 Table of Contents The following table summarizes our nonperforming assets and accruing TDRs for the years endedDecember 31 . (Dollars in thousands) 2022 2021 Nonperforming assets Nonaccrual loans$ 1,908 $ 2,004
Total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing 1,841 508 Other real estate owned
197
532
Total nonperforming assets$ 3,946 $ 3,044 Total accruing TDRs$ 4,405 $ 5,667 As a percent of total loans: Nonaccrual loans 0.07 % 0.09 % Accruing TDRs 0.17 % 0.27 % Nonaccrual loans and accruing TDRs 0.25 %
0.36 %
As a percent of total loans and other real estate owned: Nonperforming assets
0.15 % 0.14 % Nonperforming assets and accruing TDRs 0.33 % 0.41 % As a percent of total assets: Nonaccrual loans 0.05 % 0.06 % Nonperforming assets 0.11 % 0.09 % Accruing TDRs 0.13 % 0.16 % Nonperforming assets and accruing TDRs 0.24 %
0.25 %
Market Risk Management and Interest Sensitivity
The Company's net income is largely dependent on its net interest income. Net interest income is susceptible to interest rate risk to the extent that interest-bearing liabilities mature or re-price on a different basis than interest-earning assets. When interest-bearing liabilities mature or re-price more quickly than interest-earning assets in a given period, a significant increase in market rates of interest could adversely affect net interest income. Similarly, when interest-earning assets mature or re-price more quickly than interest-bearing liabilities, falling interest rates could result in a decrease in net interest income. Net interest income is also affected by changes in the portion of interest-earning assets that are funded by interest-bearing liabilities rather than by other sources of funds, such as noninterest-bearing deposits and stockholders' equity. The Company's interest rate risk management goals are (1) to increase net interest income at a growth rate consistent with the growth rate of total assets, and (2) to minimize fluctuations in net interest margin as a percentage of interest-earning assets. Management attempts to achieve these goals by balancing, within policy limits, the volume of floating-rate liabilities with a similar volume of floating-rate assets; by keeping the average maturity of fixed-rate asset and liability contracts reasonably matched; by maintaining a pool of administered core deposits; and by adjusting pricing rates to market conditions on a continuing basis. The Company's Board of Directors has established a comprehensive asset liability management policy, which is administered by management's Asset Liability Management Committee ("ALCO"). The policy establishes limits on risk, which are quantitative measures of the percentage change in net interest income (a measure of net interest income at risk) and the fair value of equity capital (a measure of economic value of equity or "EVE" at risk) resulting from a hypothetical change in the yield curve ofU.S. Treasury interest rates for maturities from one day to thirty years. The Company evaluates the potential adverse impacts that changing interest rates may have on its short-term earnings, long-term value, and liquidity by outsourcing simulation analysis through the use of computer modeling. The simulation model captures optionality factors such as call features and interest rate caps and floors imbedded in investment and loan portfolio contracts. As with any method of gauging interest rate risk, there are certain shortcomings inherent in the interest rate modeling methodology used by the Company. When interest rates change, actual movements in different categories of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, loan prepayments, and withdrawals of time and other deposits, may deviate significantly from assumptions used in the model. As an example, certain money market deposit accounts are 53
Table of Contents
assumed to reprice at 50% of the interest rate change in each of the up rate shock scenarios even though this is not a contractual requirement. As a practical matter, management would likely lag the impact of any upward movement in market rates on these accounts as a mechanism to manage the Company's net interest margin. Finally, the methodology does not measure or reflect the impact that higher rates may have on adjustable-rate loan customers' ability to service their debts, or the impact of rate changes on demand for loan, lease, and deposit products.
The Company presents a current base case and several alternative simulations at least once a quarter and reports the analysis to the Board of Directors. In addition, more frequent forecasts could be produced when interest rates are particularly uncertain or when other business conditions so dictate.
The statement of condition is subject to quarterly testing for six alternative interest rate shock possibilities to indicate the inherent interest rate risk. Average interest rates are shocked by +/- 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis points ("bp"), although the Company may elect not to use particular scenarios that it determines are impractical in a current rate environment. It is management's goal to structure the balance sheet so that net interest earnings at risk over a twelve-month period and the economic value of equity at risk do not exceed policy guidelines at the various interest rate shock levels. Measures of net interest income at risk produced by simulation analysis are indicators of an institution's short-term performance in alternative rate environments. These measures are typically based upon a relatively brief period, usually one year. They do not necessarily indicate the long-term prospects or economic value of the institution. The measures of equity value at risk indicate the ongoing economic value of the Company by considering the effects of changes in interest rates on all of the Company's cash flows, and by discounting the cash flows to estimate the present value of assets and liabilities. The difference between these discounted values of the assets and liabilities is the EVE, which, in theory, approximates the fair value of the Company's net assets. The following tables present the projected change in the Bank's net interest income and EVE atDecember 31, 2022 and 2021 that would occur upon an immediate change in interest rates based on independent analysis, but without giving effect to any steps that management might take to counteract that change: Estimated Changes in Net Interest Income Change in Interest Rates: +400 bp +300 bp +200 bp
+100 bp 100 bp 200 bp Policy Limit +/- 40 % +/- 30 % +/- 20 % +/- 10 % +/-10 % +/- 20 % December 31, 2022 (11.7) % (8.6) % (5.5) % (2.6) % (5.1) % (11.5) % December 31, 2021 23.5 % 18.0 % 12.6 % 6.7 % (7.0) % (10.6) % Estimated Changes in Economic Value of Equity Change in Interest Rates: +400 bp +300 bp +200 bp +100 bp 100 bp 200 bp Policy Limit +/- 25 % +/- 20 % +/- 15 % +/- 10 % +/- 20 % +/- 35 % December 31, 2022 (25.3) % (18.9) % (12.4) % (6.0) % 0.1 % (2.6) % December 31, 2021 (2.1) % (0.5) %
1.0 % 1.1 % (10.9) % (23.0) %
As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing tables. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features which restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, if interest rates change, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from certificates of deposit could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the tables.
Inflation
The Consolidated Financial Statements and related consolidated financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and practices within the banking industry which require the measurement of financial condition 54
Table of Contents
and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. As a financial institution, virtually all of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature and interest rates have a more significant impact on our performance than the effects of general levels of inflation. A prolonged period of inflation could cause interest rates, wages, and other costs to increase and could adversely affect our results of operations unless mitigated by increases in our revenues correspondingly.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Credit Commitments
In the normal course of business, to meet the financing needs of its customers, the Bank is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The Bank's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to these financial instruments is represented by the contractual amount of the instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as they use for on-balance sheet instruments. The Bank generally requires collateral or other security to support the financial instruments with credit risk. The amount of collateral or other security is determined based on management's credit evaluation of the counterparty. The Bank evaluates each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Letters of credit and other commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Because many of the letters of credit and commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Further information about these arrangements is provided in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Management does not believe that any of the foregoing arrangements have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
Derivatives
We maintain and account for derivatives, in the form of interest rate lock commitments ("IRLCs") and mandatory forward contracts, in accordance with theFinancial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") guidance on accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. We recognize gains and losses on IRLCs, mandatory forward contracts, and best effort forward contracts on the loan pipeline through mortgage-banking revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income. IRLCs on mortgage loans that we intend to sell in the secondary market are considered derivatives. We are exposed to price risk from the time a mortgage loan is locked in until the time the loan is sold. The period of time between issuance of a loan commitment and closing and sale of the loan generally ranges from 14 days to 120 days. For these IRLCs, we attempt to protect the Bank from changes in interest rates through the use of to be announced ("TBA") securities, which are forward contracts, as well as loan level commitments, on a limited basis, in the form of best efforts and mandatory forward contracts. Mandatory forward contracts are also considered derivatives. Best efforts forward contracts are not derivatives, however, we have elected to measure and report these commitments at fair value. These assets and liabilities are included in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition in other assets and accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on our derivatives.
Liquidity Management
Liquidity describes our ability to meet financial obligations that arise during the normal course of business. Liquidity is primarily needed to meet the borrowing and deposit withdrawal requirements of customers and to fund current and planned expenditures. Liquidity is derived through increased customer deposits, maturities in the investment portfolio, loan repayments and income from earning assets. To the extent that deposits are not adequate to fund customer loan demand, liquidity needs can be met in the short-term funds markets. We have arrangements with correspondent banks whereby we 55
Table of Contents
have
AtDecember 31, 2022 , our loan to deposit ratio was approximately 85.0%, higher than the 70.0% at year-end 2021. This increase is the result of our loans increasing$436.9 million , or 20.6% since year end 2021. Investment securities available for sale totaling$83.6 million at the end of 2022 were available for the management of liquidity and interest rate risk, subject to certain pledging requirements, which can be easily transitioned to held to maturity securities. The comparable amount was$117.0 million atDecember 31, 2021 . Cash and cash equivalents were$55.5 million atDecember 31, 2022 , a decrease of$528.1 million , or 90.5%, compared to the$583.6 million at year-end 2021, which reflects the use of such funds to invest in loans and investment securities during 2022. Management is not aware of any demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that will materially affect our ability to maintain liquidity at satisfactory levels.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The information required by this item may be found in Item 7 of Part II of this annual report under the caption "Market Risk Management and Interest Sensitivity", which is incorporated herein by reference.
56
Table of Contents
© Edgar Online, source