Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
116.9 USD | +1.65% | +4.22% | -19.10% |
Apr. 19 | Albemarle, Cummins receive tax credits under Biden's clean energy drive | RE |
Apr. 15 | Tesla supplier Piedmont Lithium gets key North Carolina mining permit | RE |
Summary
- Overall, the company has poor fundamentals for a medium to long-term investment strategy.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
Strengths
- The company's EBITDA/Sales ratio is relatively high and results in high margins before depreciation, amortization and taxes.
- The group's activity appears highly profitable thanks to its outperforming net margins.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The company's currently anticipated earnings per share (EPS) growth for the next few years is a notable weakness.
- The company is in debt and has limited leeway for investment
- The company is not the most generous with respect to shareholders' compensation.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- The company's sales previsions for the coming years have been revised downwards, which foreshadows another slowdown in business.
- For the past year, analysts have significantly revised downwards their profit estimates.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Specialty Chemicals
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-19.10% | 13.74B | C+ | ||
+11.47% | 63.22B | A- | ||
-3.47% | 46.34B | A- | ||
+13.72% | 39.97B | B+ | ||
+17.83% | 25.46B | A- | ||
+7.27% | 18.68B | C+ | ||
-0.57% | 17.24B | B+ | ||
-21.73% | 15.81B | A- | ||
+0.22% | 14.9B | B+ | ||
+35.12% | 12.81B | A- |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- ALB Stock
- Ratings Albemarle Corporation