Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
15.52 USD | -0.96% | +3.60% | -13.15% |
Mar. 21 | Sector Update: Energy Stocks Advance in Late Thursday Afternoon Trading | MT |
Mar. 21 | Sector Update: Energy Stocks Edge Higher in Thursday Afternoon Trading | MT |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
Strengths
- The company has attractive valuation levels with a low EV/sales ratio compared with its peers.
- Analysts have a positive opinion on this stock. Average consensus recommends overweighting or purchasing the stock.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The potential for earnings per share (EPS) growth in the coming years appears limited according to current analyst estimates.
- As a percentage of sales and without taking into account depreciation and amortization, the company has relatively low margins.
- The company does not generate enough profits, which is an alarming weak point.
- The group shows a rather high level of debt in proportion to its EBITDA.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- Revenue estimates are regularly revised downwards for the current and coming years.
- For the past year, analysts have significantly revised downwards their profit estimates.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Oil & Gas Refining and Marketing
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-13.15% | 1.25B | C | ||
+3.35% | 11.3B | B | ||
+34.34% | 11.4B | B+ | ||
+36.55% | 9.18B | B+ | ||
+0.35% | 7.4B | - | D- | |
+88.44% | 5.28B | C | ||
+9.64% | 3.34B | D+ | ||
-1.77% | 3.33B | B | ||
+12.04% | 3.08B | B+ | ||
+15.04% | 2.73B | B- |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- CLMT Stock
- Ratings Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.