End-of-day quote
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
11.31 CNY | -1.99% | +12.09% | -34.01% |
Apr. 30 | Pacific Assets Trust cautiously optimistic after outpacing benchmark | AN |
Apr. 25 | Jefferies Downgrades Glodon to Hold From Buy, Adjusts Price Target to 10.81 Yuan From 48.86 Yuan | MT |
Summary
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
Strengths
- The company's earnings per share (EPS) are expected to grow significantly over the next few years according to the consensus of analysts covering the stock.
- Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
Weaknesses
- The company's valuation in terms of earnings multiples is rather high. Indeed, the firm is getting paid 40.9 times its estimated earnings per share for the ongoing year.
- In relation to the value of its tangible assets, the company's valuation appears relatively high.
- The company is highly valued given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- The company's sales previsions for the coming years have been revised downwards, which foreshadows another slowdown in business.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- The company's earnings releases usually do not meet expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Software
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-34.01% | 2.58B | B+ | ||
+5.08% | 2,894B | C+ | ||
+1.41% | 80.94B | B | ||
+0.80% | 75.01B | B+ | ||
-16.29% | 52.08B | B+ | ||
+28.83% | 48.93B | D+ | ||
-27.36% | 44.85B | B- | ||
+18.65% | 40.49B | D+ | ||
+54.79% | 36.29B | D+ | ||
-11.31% | 24.36B | C+ |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- 002410 Stock
- Ratings Glodon Company Limited