MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC. |
Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
| 29.08 USD | +1.01% |
|
+3.93% | -20.48% |
Summary
- Overall, the company has poor fundamentals for a medium to long-term investment strategy.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
Weaknesses
- According to Standard & Poor's' forecast, revenue growth prospects are expected to be very low for the next fiscal years.
- Low profitability weakens the company.
- The company is in debt and has limited leeway for investment
- The valuation of the company is particularly high given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- The sales outlook for the group was lowered in the last twelve months. This change in forecast points out a decline in activity as well as pessimistic analyses of the company.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- The appreciation potential seems limited due to the average target prices set by the analysts covering the stock.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Aerospace & Defense
| 1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -20.48% | 1.73B | C+ | ||
| +20.53% | 135B | C | ||
| +9.53% | 77.91B | B | ||
| +2.63% | 71.1B | A- | ||
| +20.67% | 50.29B | B | ||
| +40.51% | 43.87B | A- | ||
| +1.86% | 40.78B | B+ | ||
| +42.10% | 31.95B | C- | ||
| +19.32% | 23.26B | C- | ||
| +29.77% | 20.94B | B- |
Investor Rating
Trading Rating
ESG Refinitiv
Financials
Sales growth
Earnings Growth
-
EBITDA / Sales
Profitability
Finances
Valuation
P/E ratio
-
EV / Sales
Price to Book
Price to Free Cash Flow
Yield
-
Momentum
1 year Revenue revision
4 months Revenue revision
7 days Revenue revision
1 year EPS revision
4 months EPS revision
Consensus
Analyst Opinion
Potential Price Target
4m Target Price Revision
4m Revision of opinion
12m Revision of opinion
Business Predictability
Analyst Coverage
Divergence of Estimates
Divergence of analysts' opinions
Divergence of Target Price
Earnings quality
Environment
Emissions
Innovation
Use of resources
Governance
CSR Strategy
Management
Shareholders
Controversy
Controversy
Technical analysis
ST Timing
MT Timing
LT Timing
RSI
Bollinger Spread
Unusual volumes
- Stock Market
- Equities
- MRCY Stock
- Ratings Mercury Systems, Inc.
